本文選題：東亞自然觀 + 文化比較��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：日漸發(fā)達(dá)的物質(zhì)文明和不斷升級的生態(tài)危機是一個物體的兩面,它帶來了人們對西方文化、西方分析思維的反思以及東方"天人合一"自然觀的水漲船高。"天人合一"自然觀作為一種哲學(xué)思想源于中國,同時它作為一種自然智慧,又是處于同一漢字文化圈的人們,在各自的自然環(huán)境、人文環(huán)境下的生存體驗歷史。西方危機帶來的人與自然的思考,是人與生存環(huán)境、人與文化傳統(tǒng)的思考,它應(yīng)該是直接的、具象的、多元化的。因此本文通過水這一與人們的生存、生活、審美實踐密切相關(guān)的自然元素,從比較文化視角對東亞中日韓水意象進行比較,以求能夠重塑東亞"天人合一"自然觀的傳統(tǒng)生命意識。就東亞內(nèi)部的文化比較而言差異性重于共性,差異性其根源是文化的內(nèi)在自生性。然而由于東西比較范式的影響,"東亞"很容易被簡單劃入以中國為代表的文化范疇,從而忽略了日韓文化的內(nèi)在特質(zhì)。基于這一點,本文提出以差異性為基礎(chǔ)探討東亞自然觀的文化傳統(tǒng),并試圖構(gòu)建新的東亞水原型意象比較模式。為此,首先從三國自然環(huán)境、文化背景、思維方式、原始宗教信仰出發(fā),考察了中日韓"天人合一"自然觀,發(fā)現(xiàn)了其不同特點。即中國強調(diào)主客體統(tǒng)一的天人合一自然觀,注重向天的自然媒介作用;日本從萬物源于"心"的宇宙觀出發(fā),強調(diào)神人"和"與本性;韓國的"天人相輿"自然觀則注重人的主體實踐對自然(天)產(chǎn)生的積極作用。其次,追溯到中日韓文化中的水思想源頭,論述了中日韓水思想與文化背景的內(nèi)在聯(lián)系,以此構(gòu)筑了中日韓水意象比較的內(nèi)在理論體系。在東亞水原型意象比較上,本文通過神話、民俗文化、文學(xué)等三種詮釋方式,考察了水在中日韓各自的生存環(huán)境、生活環(huán)境、審美實踐中的文化意象。從共性來看,東亞水原型意象都具有生命意義、女性意義、時空意義,而差異性在于各自水生命意義的不同內(nèi)涵,以及由此產(chǎn)生的三個文化意象之間的內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)。中國水原型意象追求來自生命源頭的永恒性;日本文化的水原型意象體現(xiàn)生命更新意識,通過靈魂的凈化獲取無限的能量;韓國水原型生命意義體現(xiàn)兩性結(jié)合原理,強調(diào)生命形態(tài)的完整性,這是用人的生命形態(tài)觀照自然的結(jié)果。這些差異性是東亞文化圈的人們對自身生命活動進行根本性思考的結(jié)果,并且在漫長的歷史中逐漸內(nèi)化為一定文化群體的水精神。
[Abstract]:The increasingly developed material civilization and the escalating ecological crisis are two sides of the same object, which brings people's reflection on the western culture, Western analytical thinking and the rising tide of the oriental view of "the unity of nature and man". " As a philosophical thought, the concept of nature originates from China, at the same time, as a kind of natural wisdom, it is also a kind of people in the same cultural circle of Chinese characters, living and experiencing history in their own natural environment and humanistic environment. The thinking of man and nature brought by the western crisis is the thinking of man and living environment, man and cultural tradition. It should be direct, concrete and pluralistic. Therefore, through water, a natural element closely related to people's survival, life and aesthetic practice, this paper compares the water images of East Asia, China, Japan and South Korea from the perspective of comparative culture. In order to reshape the traditional life consciousness of East Asia's "the unity of nature and man". In terms of the cultural comparison in East Asia, the difference is more important than the commonness, and the root of the difference is the inherent spontaneity of the culture. However, due to the influence of the East-West comparative paradigm, "East Asia" is easily classified into the category of culture represented by China, thus neglecting the inherent characteristics of Japanese and Korean culture. Based on this, this paper proposes to explore the cultural tradition of East Asia's view of nature on the basis of difference, and tries to construct a new model of East Asian water archetypal image comparison. Therefore, starting from the natural environment, cultural background, mode of thinking and primitive religious belief of the three countries, this paper investigates the natural view of "the unity of nature and man" between China, Japan and South Korea, and finds its different characteristics. That is, China emphasizes the unity of the subject and the object, the unity of nature and man, and the role of the natural medium to the sky, and Japan emphasizes the nature of God and man from the view of the universe in which all things originate from the heart. In Korea, the view of nature emphasizes the positive effect of man's main body practice on nature. Secondly, it traces back to the source of water thought in the culture of China, Japan and Korea, and discusses the internal relation between the water thought of China, Japan and Korea and the cultural background, and constructs the internal theoretical system of water image comparison between China, Japan and Korea. In the comparison of East Asian water archetypal images, this paper examines the living environment, living environment and aesthetic practice of water in China, Japan and South Korea by means of mythology, folklore culture and literature. From the general point of view, the East Asian water archetypal images all have the meaning of life, the meaning of women, the meaning of time and space, and the difference lies in the different connotations of their own water life meanings, and the internal relations among the three cultural images. The Chinese water archetypal image pursues the permanence from the source of life; the water archetypal image of Japanese culture embodies the consciousness of life renewal and obtains unlimited energy through the purification of soul; the Korean water archetypal life meaning embodies the principle of the combination of two sexes. Emphasize the integrity of life form, this is the result of human life form view of nature. These differences are the result of people in East Asian cultural circle thinking about their own life activities, and gradually internalize the water spirit of a certain cultural group in the long history.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：I106;G04
，

本文編號：1878120