【摘要】：本文通過(guò)梳理卡爾·馬克思對(duì)印度教和印度教社會(huì)的論述,以"東方學(xué)家"的學(xué)術(shù)研究和對(duì)印度的誤讀為參照,從宗教社會(huì)學(xué)的角度分析馬克思及其學(xué)派的研究方法和特色,嘗試提出自己的學(xué)術(shù)認(rèn)識(shí)。本文認(rèn)為,馬克思的"人類社會(huì)"與東方學(xué)家的"歐洲中心論",在研究目的和學(xué)術(shù)態(tài)度上形成鮮明對(duì)比;馬克思對(duì)于印度宗教實(shí)踐、印度教社會(huì)的種姓制度和村社制度與英國(guó)殖民的關(guān)系的論述,提出了傳統(tǒng)宗教文化與現(xiàn)代化的關(guān)系的命題,為宗教社會(huì)學(xué)的學(xué)術(shù)建構(gòu)做出了重大貢獻(xiàn);馬克思關(guān)于"社會(huì)中的宗教"的研究路徑和相關(guān)論述,對(duì)于研究印度宗教文化和理解當(dāng)代印度,具有重要的啟發(fā)和指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:By combing Karl Marx's exposition of Hinduism and Hinduism society, taking the academic research of Orientalist and misreading of India as reference, this paper analyzes the research methods and characteristics of Marx and his school from the angle of religious sociology. Try to put forward one's own academic understanding. This paper holds that Marx's "human society" is in sharp contrast with Orientalist's "Eurocentrism" in terms of research purpose and academic attitude. Marx's exposition on the relationship between Indian religious practice, caste system and village community system in Hindu society and British colonization puts forward the proposition of the relationship between traditional religious culture and modernization. It has made great contributions to the academic construction of religious sociology; Marx's research path and related exposition on "religion in society" have important enlightening and guiding significance for studying Indian religious culture and understanding contemporary India.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院世界宗教研究所;四川大學(xué)南亞研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“印度宗教與政治的關(guān)系研究”(項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號(hào):14AZJ008)的研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：B982

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 Е·И·克恰諾夫;李佩娟;;紀(jì)念喬·戴·克勒什的國(guó)際藏學(xué)討論會(huì)[J];民族譯叢;1979年03期

2 蔡偉良;;對(duì)東方學(xué)研究的研究[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2013年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2378732