【摘要】：現(xiàn)代圣經(jīng)批評(píng)始于啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)與唯理主義時(shí)期對(duì)《摩西五經(jīng)》的質(zhì)疑。之后,各種底本假說(shuō)迭興。威爾豪森的《以色列史導(dǎo)論》出版則標(biāo)志著現(xiàn)代圣經(jīng)批評(píng)學(xué)的確立。通過(guò)對(duì)圣經(jīng)中崇拜地點(diǎn)、祭獻(xiàn)、節(jié)期和祭司利未人做翔實(shí)的歷史考察,威爾豪森令人信服地論證了《摩西五經(jīng)》最后成書(shū)于流放后這一事實(shí)。威爾豪森之后,對(duì)威爾豪森的批評(píng)和質(zhì)疑構(gòu)成了現(xiàn)代圣經(jīng)批評(píng)重要內(nèi)容,但關(guān)于《摩西五經(jīng)》何以成典,何以為經(jīng)?仍然是一個(gè)懸而未決、爭(zhēng)論不休的熱點(diǎn)。從歷史記憶、斷裂與重構(gòu)的角度重新對(duì)之考察,一些曠日持久的爭(zhēng)論或?qū)⒌玫胶侠淼慕鉀Q。
[Abstract]:Modern biblical criticism began during the Enlightenment and rationalism to question the five Scriptures of Moses. Since then, various underlying hypotheses have emerged. Wilson's introduction to the History of Israel marks the establishment of modern biblical criticism. Through a thorough historical examination of places of worship in the Bible, offerings, feasts, and the Levites, Wilhausen convincingly demonstrated the fact that the five Scriptures of Moses ended up in exile. After Wilson, the criticism and questioning of Wilson constituted an important part of modern biblical criticism. But what about the five scriptures of Moses? It is still an unresolved and controversial hot spot. From the perspective of historical memory, fracture and reconstruction, some protracted disputes may be reasonably resolved.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金一般項(xiàng)目《〈摩西五經(jīng)〉與〈周禮〉的跨文本比較研究》(批號(hào):12BZJ018)階段性成果 江蘇省“青藍(lán)工程” 南大人文基金的資助
【分類號(hào)】：B971

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳貽繹;;威爾豪森對(duì)早期以色列歷史的研究[J];東方論壇;2013年05期

2 保爾·博尚;李夏裔;;評(píng)“洪典—圣經(jīng)與文學(xué)”[J];法國(guó)研究;1986年03期

3 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2256584