本文選題：調(diào)和 + 調(diào)和主義　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2013年05期

【摘要】：阿拉伯世界傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代的關(guān)系問題凸顯于伊斯蘭世界遭殖民入侵之時(shí)。一戰(zhàn)后,伴隨著西方社會(huì)對(duì)自身文明的反思,阿拉伯伊斯蘭世界因西方分而治之的政策而全面陷入深重的民族身份危機(jī),又因阿拉伯社會(huì)具"中間主義"傾向的小資產(chǎn)階級(jí)的興起,阿拉伯社會(huì)思想總體而言放棄了世俗主義的選擇,再次向固有文化傳統(tǒng)回歸,并試圖調(diào)和宗教與理性、傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代、東方與西方。"新調(diào)和主義"理論上同時(shí)囊括了阿拉伯社會(huì)兩大社會(huì)思潮:伊斯蘭現(xiàn)代主義思潮和伊斯蘭復(fù)興運(yùn)動(dòng),試圖在維系伊斯蘭傳統(tǒng)的基礎(chǔ)上,實(shí)現(xiàn)傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代的平衡,對(duì)阿拉伯社會(huì)興起的阿拉伯民族主義、阿拉伯社會(huì)主義等思潮均產(chǎn)生了不可忽視的影響。
[Abstract]:The relationship between tradition and modernity in the Arab world came to light at the time of the colonial invasion of the Islamic world. After World War I, with the reflection of the Western society on its own civilization, the Arab Islamic world was plunged into a deep national identity crisis because of the policy of partition and rule by the West. Because of the rise of the petty bourgeoisie with the tendency of "centrism" in Arab society, the Arab social ideology, on the whole, gave up the choice of secularism, returned to the inherent cultural tradition again, and tried to reconcile religion with reason, tradition with modern, East and West. " Neo-conciliationism "theoretically includes two major social trends of thought in Arab society: Islamic modernism and Islamic renaissance, trying to achieve a balance between tradition and modernity on the basis of maintaining Islamic tradition." Arab nationalism, Arab socialism and other trends of thought that rise in Arab society have exerted an unnegligible influence.
【作者單位】： 北京外國語大學(xué)阿拉伯語系;
【基金】：北京外國語大學(xué)校級(jí)青年教師創(chuàng)新項(xiàng)目“調(diào)和的回歸——20世紀(jì)初阿拉伯社會(huì)思潮的轉(zhuǎn)變”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào)2011XJ019) 北京外國語大學(xué)校級(jí)規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“阿拉伯變局后的社會(huì)思潮研究”(項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號(hào)2013XG001)
【分類號(hào)】：D737.1;B968

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賈東;;艾什阿里派的調(diào)和主義與中正之道思想[J];中國穆斯林;2014年03期

2 陳友良;;留英學(xué)生與五四新文化運(yùn)動(dòng)——以《太平洋》雜志為中心[J];安徽史學(xué);2006年02期

3 宋群;;我們應(yīng)該如何應(yīng)對(duì)認(rèn)知分歧[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

4 吳e，

本文編號(hào)：2113481