本文選題：破山禪派 + 聚云法派　； 參考：《宗教學研究》2015年04期

【摘要】：學術界對破山禪派與聚云法派之間的僧諍所作的探討存在不少誤區(qū)。結合雙方的言論來看,破山海明對吹萬廣真的"從上古人單教人明心見性"、"明眼行道者妄行棒喝"等禪學觀點的批判是誤解了吹萬廣真的真實意圖。破山海明及其法嗣山暉行渙對聚云法派傳承問題的駁斥則反映出兩派在法派諍議中的不同立場,破山禪派是以面稟親承為原則,辟聚云法派傳承之妄。聚云法派主張以心心相印,反對專務源流的形式主義做法。聚云法派沒有因兩派僧諍而迅速走衰,它在清代康乾時期的浙江地區(qū)相當繁盛。
[Abstract]:There are many misunderstandings in the discussion of the monk Zheng between the Zen School of the broken Mountain and the School of Juyun Law. According to the opinions of both sides, Zhu Shanhaiming's criticism of the Zen viewpoints such as "only teaching people to see the heart from the upper ancients" and "the bright eyes and the Taoists walking the stick and drinking" is a misunderstanding of the true intention of blowing Wan Kwong. Dushanhaiming and Fashishan Huihuan refute the inheritance of Juyun Dafa School, which reflects the different positions of the two schools in the debate of the Dharma School. The Dushan Zen School is based on the principle of "bearing on one's face" and passing on the inheritance of the "Juyun" Dharma School. The Juyun Fa-school advocated to agree with each other and oppose the formalism of the origin of special affairs. Juyun Dharma did not decline rapidly because of the two schools of monks. It flourished in Zhejiang during the Kangqian period of the Qing Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 吉首大學哲學研究所;
【分類號】：B948

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 王路平;;明季西南禪宗祖師破山的生平及其佛教活動[J];貴州文史叢刊;2006年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：2064695