本文選題：比較研究 + 文化價值　； 參考：《中南民族大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：神話是遠古先民以不自覺的藝術(shù)加工形式,感知、認識、言說世界的產(chǎn)物。不同民族的神話粘附著不同民族遠古時期物質(zhì)和精神生活的信念。解讀不同民族的神話,可以揭示不同民族文化的特質(zhì)及走向。本文在文化學(xué)的視域下,以受罰的視角為切入點,從受罰誘因、表象、結(jié)果、程度四個方面對伏羲女媧與亞當(dāng)夏娃神話進行比較研究,試圖探討華夏民族和希伯來民族不同的文化類型、婚姻觀念、思維習(xí)慣、民族性格與文化選擇。 全文共分七個部分: 緒論部分概述了選題緣由、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究盲點,確立了本論文的研究目標(biāo)、研究對象、研究方法、研究目的。 第一章探討了伏羲女媧與亞當(dāng)夏娃的神話敘述。華夏民族文化發(fā)展極不均衡,伏羲女媧神話流布呈現(xiàn)零散的特點,本文分別從口頭和文獻,漢族和少數(shù)民族兩方進行分析,而希伯來文化思辨嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),亞當(dāng)夏娃神話多為體系式發(fā)展,具體存于《圣經(jīng)·舊約》的《創(chuàng)世紀(jì)》中。 第二章通過伏羲女媧與亞當(dāng)夏娃形象的比較,得出二者在神格、血緣關(guān)系以及男權(quán)地位的崇尚等方面的相同點,同時,分析出兩者在產(chǎn)生方式及社會地位的不同,為后文的闡述奠定堅實的現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ)。 第三章以受罰型神話為視角,通過分析不同的受罰誘因、方式、結(jié)果,了解華夏民族和希伯來民族對待錯誤不同的處理方式,揭示其背后蘊藏的民族文化。華夏民族文化具有儒釋道背景,強調(diào)文化的教化作用;而希伯來民族文化具有原罪背景,具有濃厚的宗教意韻,警示人類透視現(xiàn)世的罪惡,以求上帝的寬恕。 第四章分析差異存在的現(xiàn)實表現(xiàn)及成因。在文化身份上,伏羲女媧神話代表典型的農(nóng)耕文明,亞當(dāng)夏娃神話代表游牧文明;在哲學(xué)層面上,伏羲女媧神話強調(diào)陰陽和諧,亞當(dāng)夏娃神話強調(diào)人神對立。在宗教倫理層面上,伏羲女媧神話強調(diào)天人合一,亞當(dāng)夏娃神話強調(diào)原罪救贖;在美學(xué)意義上,伏羲女媧神話強調(diào)寧靜致遠,亞當(dāng)夏娃神話強調(diào)壯懷激烈之情。 第五章揭示伏羲女媧、亞當(dāng)夏娃神話對后世的影響。不同的自然條件與歷史發(fā)展進程,使得中西呈現(xiàn)相異的民族性格和思維方式,特別在婚戀觀方面,存在顯著的不同,華夏民族是倫常式婚姻,注重傳宗接代;而希伯來民族追求靈肉和諧、兩性平等的愛情觀。 最后一部分小結(jié)。伏羲女媧與亞當(dāng)夏娃神話作為華夏民族和希伯來民族文化的源頭,盡管二者在許多方面存在差異,但是都探討了人類的同一性,即通過不同的途徑追求真善美。不同民族對現(xiàn)世生活有不同的理解,因此,多元文化可以同生、共存、互補。
[Abstract]:Mythology is the product of the ancient people's unconsciously artistic processing, perception, understanding, and speech of the world. The mythology of different nationalities adheres to the beliefs of material and spiritual life of different nationalities in ancient times. Unscrambling the mythology of different nationalities can reveal the characteristics and trends of different national cultures. From the perspective of culturology, this paper makes a comparative study on the myth of Fuxi Nuwa and Adam Eve from four aspects: inducement, appearance, result and degree from the perspective of punishment. This paper attempts to explore the different cultural types, concepts of marriage, thinking habits, national characters and cultural choices of the Chinese and Hebrew nationalities. The full text is divided into seven parts: In the introduction part, the author summarizes the reason, the present situation, the blind spot, and establishes the research goal, the research object, the research method and the research purpose. The first chapter discusses the mythological narration of Fuxi Nuwa and Adam Eve. The development of Chinese national culture is extremely uneven, and the myth of Fuxi Nuwa is scattered. This paper analyzes it from the oral and literature, the Han nationality and the minority nationality, while the Hebrew culture is critical. Adam and Eve mythology is a systematic development, which is embodied in Genesis in the Old Testament. The second chapter compares the images of Fuxi Nuwa and Adam Eve, and draws the similarities between them in the aspects of deity, consanguinity and patriarchal status. At the same time, it analyzes the difference between the two in the way of producing and the social status. Lay a solid realistic foundation for the following elaboration. The third chapter from the perspective of the myth of punishment, through the analysis of different incentives, ways and results of punishment, understand the Chinese and Hebrew nationalities to deal with different ways of dealing with errors, reveal the hidden behind the national culture. The Chinese national culture has the background of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism, emphasizing the enlightenment of culture, while the Hebrew national culture has the original sin background and the strong religious meaning rhyme, cautions the mankind to see through the present world's evil, in order to ask God's forgiveness. The fourth chapter analyzes the reality of the existence of differences and the causes. In terms of cultural identity, Fuxi Nuwa mythology represents typical farming civilization, Adam and Eve myth represents nomadic civilization; on the philosophical level, Fuxi Nu WA myth emphasizes harmony between yin and yang, Adam and Eve myth emphasizes the opposition of human beings and gods. In the aspect of religious ethics, Fuxi Nu WA mythology emphasizes the unity of nature and man, Adam Eve myth emphasizes original sin redemption; in aesthetic sense, Fuxi Nu WA myth emphasizes tranquility to distant, Adam Eve myth emphasizes strong and intense feeling. Chapter five reveals the influence of Fuxi Nuwa and Adam Eve mythology on later generations. Different natural conditions and historical development process make the Chinese and Western appear different national character and mode of thinking, especially in the view of marriage and love, there are significant differences. The Hebrew nation pursues the concept of spiritual harmony and gender equality. The last part is a summary. The mythology of Fuxi Nuwa and Adam and Eve is the source of Chinese and Hebrew national culture. Although there are differences between them in many aspects, they all discuss the identity of human beings, that is, pursuing truth, goodness and beauty through different ways. Different nations have different understanding of the earthly life, so multiculturalism can coexist and complement each other.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：B932

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊利慧;伏羲女媧與兄妹婚神話的粘連與復(fù)合[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1997年06期

2 趙新林;從同質(zhì)到異質(zhì)——中西創(chuàng)世神話的比較研究[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

3 楊麗娟;;世界原始創(chuàng)世神話的創(chuàng)造類型與文化底蘊[J];東北師大學(xué)報;2006年03期

4 寧稼雨;;女媧造人(造物)神話的文學(xué)移位[J];東方叢刊;2006年02期

5 郭鋒;敦煌寫本《天地開辟以來帝王紀(jì)》成書年代諸問題[J];敦煌學(xué)輯刊;1988年Z1期

6 李俊;;感性否定中的崇高——論希伯來民族悲劇精神的呈現(xiàn)方式[J];電影評介;2007年01期

7 張崇琛;;女媧神話的文化蘊涵[J];甘肅高師學(xué)報;2008年01期

8 李藝;宙斯與盤古:中西創(chuàng)世神話之比較[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年06期

9 宋瑞芝,余志權(quán);女媧與伏羲:華夏初民對兩性關(guān)系的認識[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期

10 弗雷澤 ,葉舒憲;造人神話[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳建憲;論中國洪水故事圈[D];華中師范大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 胡希;《圣經(jīng)》中的人神關(guān)系的變形及其文學(xué)表現(xiàn)[D];江西師范大學(xué);2005年

2 魏來;“天人合一”思想的當(dāng)代價值[D];長春理工大學(xué);2008年

3 宿晶;中西洪水神話的文化差異[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1968997