本文選題：宗教領(lǐng)袖　切入點(diǎn)：教皇　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 現(xiàn)代性意味著人類主體的高度自決,但同時(shí)也蘊(yùn)含著一種認(rèn)同的危機(jī)。人們在逐漸被世俗化、市場化吞噬的時(shí)候,不約而同地皈依宗教、尋找寄托�？梢哉f,現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的宗教領(lǐng)袖從來沒有在廣泛的科學(xué)興趣當(dāng)中失去恰當(dāng)?shù)奈恢谩?當(dāng)然,宗教在神學(xué)意義上的本質(zhì)不是本文的關(guān)注所在,宗教領(lǐng)袖作為一個(gè)社會(huì)構(gòu)成要素,其形成所需要的條件和產(chǎn)生的效應(yīng)才是我們此一研究的旨趣。領(lǐng)袖的出現(xiàn)是一個(gè)十分復(fù)雜而漫長的心理、社會(huì)和政治過程,我們所要做的,是將宗教領(lǐng)袖的研究從一般的軼事敘述與歌功頌德中提升出來,將其直接置于人類發(fā)展和政治行為的結(jié)構(gòu)之中,更好地解答“是什么,為什么和怎么樣”。 在對(duì)宗教領(lǐng)袖的淵源與嬗變進(jìn)行簡短的歷史回顧之后,本文的主體部分將借助結(jié)構(gòu)因素與行為因素之間的二分法:結(jié)構(gòu)主義方法強(qiáng)調(diào)系統(tǒng)的影響,體現(xiàn)在本文中即是那些支撐宗教領(lǐng)袖的組織資源,包括教義體系、組織架構(gòu)、神職人員三大類;行為主義方法集中研究內(nèi)部影響,主要表現(xiàn)為宗教領(lǐng)袖的個(gè)性化特征,包括出身、早期經(jīng)歷、形象和人格魅力,這些要素都是在其更高水平上促成認(rèn)同效應(yīng)。通過厘清來源于社會(huì)的“我(me)”和來源于生物的“我(I)”之間的辯證關(guān)系,本文力圖勾勒一個(gè)能夠?qū)ψ诮填I(lǐng)袖現(xiàn)象做出解釋的人的本源和社會(huì)化模式,并在此基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步探討現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中宗教領(lǐng)袖的影響空間以及宗教與政治的交互關(guān)系。 通過揭示宗教領(lǐng)袖的群體特征,通過論證權(quán)力為認(rèn)同所留下的空間,我們希望能夠在一定程度上擺脫對(duì)權(quán)力的熱衷,深化對(duì)現(xiàn)代性的認(rèn)識(shí)并對(duì)中國的價(jià)值重建產(chǎn)生些許啟示。
[Abstract]:Modernity means a high degree of self-determination of human subjects, but it also contains a crisis of identity. When people are gradually become secularized and market-oriented, they all convert to religion and seek sustenance. The religious leaders of modern society have never lost their rightful place in a wide range of scientific interests. Of course, the theological nature of religion is not the focus of this article, religious leaders as a social component, The conditions and effects needed for its formation are the purport of our research. The emergence of leaders is a very complex and lengthy psychological, social and political process, and what we have to do, It is to elevate the research of religious leaders from the general anecdotal narration and eulogy, put it directly in the structure of human development and political behavior, and better answer "what is, why and how". After a brief historical review of the origin and evolution of religious leaders, the main part of this paper will rely on the dichotomy between structural factors and behavioral factors: the structuralist approach emphasizes the influence of the system. Embodied in this paper are those who support religious leaders of organizational resources, including the doctrine of the system, organizational structure, clergy three categories; behaviorism focused on the study of internal influence, mainly reflected in the personalized characteristics of religious leaders, These include birth, early experience, image, and charisma, all of which contribute to the identity effect at a higher level. By clarifying the dialectical relationship between the "I" from society and the "I" from biology, This paper attempts to outline the origin and socialized mode of a person who can explain the phenomenon of religious leaders, and on this basis further discusses the influence space of religious leaders and the interaction between religion and politics in modern society. By revealing the group characteristics of religious leaders and demonstrating the space left by power for identity, we hope to get rid of the enthusiasm for power to a certain extent, deepen the understanding of modernity and give some enlightenment to the value reconstruction of China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：B911

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 郭家宏;20世紀(jì)歐美基督教的發(fā)展及其社會(huì)作用[J];歷史教學(xué);2003年10期

2 苑一博;試論基督教的自我更新[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1579324