本文選題：北京大學 + 新文化運動　； 參考：《中山大學學報(社會科學版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：由于陳獨秀被捕入獄、胡適態(tài)度保留,其他人關(guān)注重心轉(zhuǎn)移,主辦《新青年》的北京大學教授群體,對于五四以后興起的新文化運動較為疏離。而在蔡元培等人回歸常態(tài)的要求下,北大學生也顯得相對靜默。陳獨秀出獄后,敏銳地把握到新文化運動的巨大潛力,連續(xù)撰文演講,迅速加入新文化運動的行列,并且很快躍升到中堅和領(lǐng)袖的地位。胡適對于新文化運動社會性普及的一面不以為然,后來則逐漸模糊五四前后新思潮運動與新文化運動的關(guān)系。新思潮與新文化之間存在的事實聯(lián)系,也使得參與甚至異議新文化運動者將二者混為一談。歷史上的新文化運動與新文化運動的歷史敘述因此出現(xiàn)混淆。
[Abstract]:Due to Chen Duxiu's arrest, Hu Shi's attitude and others' attention to the shift of focus, the group of Peking University professors who hosted the New Youth was more alienated from the new cultural movement that began after the May 4th Movement. Under the request of Cai Yuanpei and others to return to normal, Peking University students also appear relatively silent. After Chen Duxiu was released from prison, he acutely grasped the great potential of the New Culture Movement, wrote a series of speeches, quickly joined the ranks of the New Culture Movement, and quickly rose to the position of backbone and leader. Hu Shi disagrees with the sociality of the New Cultural Movement, and later obscures the relationship between the New ideological Movement and the New Cultural Movement before and after the May 4th Movement. The fact relation between the new trend of thought and the new culture also causes the people who participate in or even disagree with the new culture movement to confuse the two. As a result, the historical narration of the New Cultural Movement and the New Cultural Movement is confused.
【作者單位】： 中山大學歷史學系;
【基金】：中山大學“三大建設”專項資助
【分類號】：K203

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陳立旭;計劃體制下的文化現(xiàn)象分析[J];浙江學刊;1999年02期

，

本文編號：2116239