本文選題：鑄刑鼎 + 政治理念��； 參考：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：“鑄刑鼎”作為中國(guó)法律史、思想史上的一大公案，圍繞其產(chǎn)生的爭(zhēng)議頗多，諸多論點(diǎn)集中于儒法之爭(zhēng)、成文法頒布、社會(huì)控制論等方面，然而筆者在整理相關(guān)史料及歷代學(xué)者觀點(diǎn)時(shí)，發(fā)現(xiàn)趙簡(jiǎn)子與孔子針對(duì)“鑄刑鼎”的分歧，主要是其各自所持的政治理念的不同。因此，筆者將從二者對(duì)舊貴族的態(tài)度及治國(guó)途徑的改良抑或革命方面進(jìn)行論述，分析其相應(yīng)的歷史背景、深層原因、內(nèi)容，進(jìn)而明辨二人不同的政治理念，并嘗試探析其對(duì)中央集權(quán)制初步形成的推動(dòng)作用。 引言部分主要簡(jiǎn)單闡述了本篇論文的選題意義，第一部分主要是通過(guò)對(duì)趙簡(jiǎn)子“鑄刑鼎”事件的史料記載，引出歷代學(xué)者對(duì)該問(wèn)題的研究論點(diǎn)的敘述，以及對(duì)當(dāng)下學(xué)者的最新研究成果的概述，并在對(duì)以往觀點(diǎn)的總結(jié)基礎(chǔ)上，提出本文的寫(xiě)作思路與研究切入點(diǎn)。第二部分，首先對(duì)政治理念進(jìn)行概念分析，然后分別就孔子與趙簡(jiǎn)子的政治理念的形成與表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行分析，對(duì)孔子政治理念的形成從三點(diǎn)分析，，一是深受魯國(guó)禮樂(lè)文化的熏陶，二是單親母性的家庭教育對(duì)孔子性格的塑造，三是孔子形成“禮”與“仁”的思想文化體系，對(duì)其政治理念的影響。對(duì)趙簡(jiǎn)子政治理念的分析，從其政治生涯的三個(gè)事件進(jìn)行分析，一是問(wèn)禮于大夫，二是鑄刑鼎于汝河之濱，三是與史墨“君臣無(wú)常位”的討論。 第三、四部分是文章的主體，以“鑄刑鼎”事件為線索，分別就孔子與趙簡(jiǎn)子不同性質(zhì)的政治理念進(jìn)行具體的分析，主要從兩個(gè)角度入手，一是對(duì)舊貴族的態(tài)度，二是對(duì)禮與法的運(yùn)用。在對(duì)舊貴族態(tài)度的論述上，從“正名”、世官制、貴族政治民主性、禮制相對(duì)合理性上，對(duì)孔子的所持的態(tài)度與政治理念進(jìn)行分析；從春秋晉國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)公室與異姓卿族的勢(shì)力對(duì)比、晉國(guó)的地域文化，分析趙簡(jiǎn)子對(duì)公室舊貴族態(tài)度的緣由，并多角度分析趙簡(jiǎn)子鑄刑鼎一事，分解讀其中所蘊(yùn)含的趙簡(jiǎn)子的政治理念。 第五部分，對(duì)趙簡(jiǎn)子與孔子不同政治理念交鋒引發(fā)的政治、思想領(lǐng)域的嬗變，做一簡(jiǎn)略探討，從三個(gè)角度進(jìn)行分析，一是由儒法之爭(zhēng)到儒法合流的過(guò)渡，二是由分封制到郡縣制的轉(zhuǎn)變，三是選官制度由世官制到官僚制的變革。
[Abstract]:As a great public case in the history of Chinese law and ideological history, "casting criminal tripod" has produced a lot of controversies. Many arguments have been focused on the disputes of Confucianism and law, the promulgation of written law, the social cybernetics, and so on. However, the author finds that the differences between Zhao Jianzi and Confucius in regard to "casting the criminal tripod" are mainly due to the differences of their respective political ideas when sorting out the relevant historical data and the viewpoints of scholars in the past dynasties. Therefore, the author will discuss their attitudes towards the old aristocrats and the improvement or revolution of their ways of governing the country, analyze their corresponding historical background, deep causes, contents, and then distinguish their different political ideas. And try to explore its role in promoting the formation of centralization. The first part is mainly about the historical records of Zhao Jianzi's "casting the criminal tripod", which leads to the narration of the research arguments of the scholars in the past dynasties. On the basis of summing up the previous viewpoints, this paper puts forward the writing ideas and research breakthrough points. In the second part, firstly, the concept of political idea is analyzed, and then the formation and expression of the political idea of Confucius and Zhao Jianzi are analyzed respectively, and the formation of the political idea of Confucius is analyzed from three aspects, one is deeply influenced by the culture of rites and music in the State of Lu. The second is the shaping of Confucius' character by single parent family education, and the third is the influence of Confucius' ideological and cultural system of "propriety" and "benevolence" on his political idea. The analysis of Zhao Jianzi's political idea is based on the three events of his political career, one is to ask the doctor, the other is to cast the criminal tripod on the banks of the Ruhe River, and the third is to discuss with Shi Mo "the impermanent position of monarch and minister". The third and fourth parts are the main body of the article. Taking the incident of "casting the criminal tripod" as the clue, this paper makes a specific analysis of the different nature of the political ideas of Confucius and Zhao Jianzi, mainly from two angles, one is the attitude towards the old aristocrats. The second is the use of propriety and law. On the exposition of the old aristocratic attitude, the author analyzes Confucius' attitude and political idea from the aspects of "correct name", the world official system, the aristocratic political democracy and the relative rationality of the etiquette system. From the power comparison between the domestic public office and the Qing nationality of Jin in the Spring and Autumn period, the regional culture of Jin, the reason of Zhao Jianzi's attitude towards the old aristocrats in the public room was analyzed, and the matter of Zhao Jianzi casting the tripod was analyzed from various angles. It explains the political idea of Zhao Jianzi. The fifth part makes a brief discussion on the evolution of the political and ideological fields caused by the confrontation between Zhao Jianzi and Confucius in different political ideas, and analyzes from three angles: the first is the transition from the argument of Confucianism to the confluence of Confucianism and law. The second is the change from the system of seal to the system of counties, and the third is the change of the system of selecting officials from the official system of the world to the system of bureaucrats.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：K225

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃東海;范忠信;;春秋鑄刑書(shū)刑鼎究竟昭示了什么巨變[J];法學(xué);2008年02期

2 武樹(shù)臣;;地域文化與先秦法律思想的主旋律[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年06期

3 趙光賢;;先秦貴族政治略說(shuō)[J];寶雞師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1989年03期

4 徐景重;春秋時(shí)代的改良思想家——孔子[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1984年01期

5 葛志毅;從政治角度解讀先秦社會(huì)形態(tài)[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

6 應(yīng)永深;;論春秋時(shí)代魯國(guó)和晉國(guó)的社會(huì)特點(diǎn)兼及儒家和法家產(chǎn)生的歷史背景[J];歷史研究;1964年01期

7 ;從冶鐵技術(shù)的發(fā)展看先秦兩漢時(shí)期的儒法斗爭(zhēng)[J];化學(xué)通報(bào);1975年01期

8 李孟存;“簡(jiǎn)襄功烈”述評(píng)[J];山西師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1988年04期

9 李泉，杜建民;論夏商周君主制政體的性質(zhì)[J];史學(xué)月刊;1995年03期

10 溫慧輝;;“懸pK象魏”考辨——兼論“鑄刑書(shū)”與“鑄刑鼎”問(wèn)題[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

本文編號(hào)：2030070