本文選題：二郎 + 政治史��； 參考：《中國史研究動(dòng)態(tài)》2017年04期

【摘要】：正按六朝史史料,其中《晉書》系唐人重新整理既有史書的產(chǎn)物,而《宋書》等南朝正史則在《南史》成書后部分散佚,直到后世才重新編纂。因此,學(xué)者在使用上述史料時(shí),進(jìn)行史料批判無疑是很必要的。此外,諸書記述亦有偏頗,故對(duì)其記載內(nèi)容的可信與否,也必須將撰者意圖包括在內(nèi)重新予以檢討。安田二郎所著《六朝政治史研究》(京都大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)出版會(huì),2003年)就是立足六朝史料的這一特征,并對(duì)
[Abstract]:According to the historical data of the six dynasties, "Jin Shu" is the product of the Tang Dynasty rearranging the existing historical books, while the official history of the Southern Dynasty, such as "Song Book", was partly lost after the "Southern History" was written, and was not compiled again until later generations. Therefore, scholars in the use of the above-mentioned historical materials, it is undoubtedly necessary to criticize historical data. In addition, the secretaries are biased, so the credibility of their records must also be reviewed to include the intention of the writer. The study of the political History of the six dynasties by Ichiro Okada (academic Publishing Conference of Kyoto University, 2003) is based on this characteristic of the historical materials of the six dynasties.
【作者單位】： 日本德島大學(xué)綜合科學(xué)學(xué)部;首都師范大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K207.8
，

本文編號(hào)：1846568