本文選題：《左傳》學 + 紀事本末體��； 參考：《文史哲》2017年04期

【摘要】：與編年體、紀傳體并列為我國古代三大史書體裁的紀事本末體,有一個歷史性的生發(fā)源頭,即《左傳》學中的紀事類編學。由于《左傳》敘事存在"隔斷",在六朝至宋代極為流行的《左傳》學中,出現(xiàn)了類編《左傳》紀事的系列著作。在南宋前期治史為鑒的思潮下,這一《左傳》紀事類編學與逐漸興起的《資治通鑒》學相結合,產生出被清四庫館臣稱為紀事本末體典范和創(chuàng)例之作的袁樞《通鑒紀事本末》,徐夢莘撰著《三朝北盟會編》,亦受其影響。此后,紀事本末體史書編纂續(xù)成傳統(tǒng)。鑒于《左傳》紀事類編學形成更早,四庫館臣所謂袁樞《通鑒紀事本末》"創(chuàng)紀事本末之例",當是誤說,但在史學著作范疇內,袁樞此書可視為史書紀事本末體的創(chuàng)始之作。
[Abstract]:The chronological style, chronological style and chronological style are the same as the chronology of the three major historical genres in ancient China, which has a historical origin, that is, the chronological compilation in the study of Zuo Zhuan (Zuo Zhuan).Because the narration of Zuo Zhuan has "partition", in the study of Zuo Zhuan, which is very popular from the six dynasties to the Song Dynasty, a series of works about the chronicle of Zuo Zhuan appeared.Under the trend of learning history in the early period of the Southern Song Dynasty, this "Zuo Zhuan" chronology was combined with the gradually rising "Zi Zhi Tong Jian" study.Yuan Shu, who was called a model and an example of the late Chronicle, was also influenced by Xu Mengxin, who wrote the compilation of the three North dynasties League.Since then, the chronicle of the end of the compilation of historical books into a tradition.In view of the fact that the Chronicle compilation of Zuo Zhuan was formed earlier, the so-called "the case of creating the Chronicle" by Yuan Shu, the minister of Siku, was mistaken, but in the field of historical works, Yuan Shu's book can be regarded as the founding work of the historical chronicle.
【作者單位】： 山東大學歷史文化學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學規(guī)劃基金一般項目“宋代《春秋》學史”(15BZS054)的階段性成果
【分類號】：K204.2;K225.04
，

本文編號：1760019