本文選題：北魏　切入點(diǎn)：喪葬禮俗　出處：《民俗研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：段銳超、段元秀撰寫的《"魂人"禮俗與北魏文化認(rèn)同》一文,認(rèn)為北魏有"魂人"禮俗一說(shuō)。實(shí)際上,"魂人"一說(shuō),來(lái)源于趙翼在《陔余叢考》"冥婚"詞條對(duì)《魏書》的錯(cuò)誤句讀。受《陔余叢考》失誤影響,段文沒(méi)有對(duì)傳世文獻(xiàn)認(rèn)真辨析,對(duì)現(xiàn)有研究成果也缺乏認(rèn)真研讀,論證中所引用的案例也存在著不少問(wèn)題,故該文的立論是站不住腳的。如對(duì)存在的問(wèn)題不加辨析,必然會(huì)給民俗史的研究帶來(lái)混亂,故有必要詳細(xì)分析,認(rèn)真甄別,在廓清史實(shí)基礎(chǔ)上,避免以訛傳訛,出現(xiàn)更多的失誤。
[Abstract]:Duan Rechao, Duan Yuanxiu wrote "Soul Man" and the Northern Wei Culture identity, that there is a "Soul Man" etiquette and custom in the Northern Wei Dynasty.In fact, the theory of "Soul Man" originates from Zhao Yi's wrong sentence reading of Wei Shu in Yu Cong textual Research > "Underworld Marriage".Affected by the mistakes of "Yu Cong examination", Duan Wen did not seriously discriminate and analyze the documents handed down, nor did he seriously study the existing research results. There are also many problems in the cases cited in the argumentation, so the argument in this paper is untenable.If we do not discriminate and analyze the existing problems, it will inevitably bring confusion to the study of folklore history, so it is necessary to analyze in detail and carefully discriminate, on the basis of clarifying the historical facts, to avoid falsehood and make more mistakes.
【作者單位】： 東南大學(xué)藝術(shù)學(xué)院;珠海城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院;
【基金】：廣東省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)“十三五”規(guī)劃2016年度學(xué)科共建項(xiàng)目“五代十國(guó)墓志研究”(課題編號(hào):GD16XLS03) 江蘇省博士后科研資助計(jì)劃(課題編號(hào):1601029C)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：K892.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 杜林淵;;漢代喪歸制度初步研究[J];江漢考古;2009年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 國(guó)風(fēng);慎終追遠(yuǎn)——古代的喪禮[N];中國(guó)縣域經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1726416