本文選題：《月令》　切入點：太史　出處：《學術(shù)月刊》2016年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：《月令》最初創(chuàng)制者不是儒家學者,是漢代戴圣將它編入《禮記》才成為儒家經(jīng)典,但它并無典型的儒家思想,其禮儀也非儒家的禮儀,撰述語言與先秦儒家著述差異很大,可以肯定不是秦漢時期所著。《月令》以政令為核心,將陰陽五行、物候、星象歷法等內(nèi)容緊密聯(lián)成一體,體現(xiàn)出王朝"法令"的特色。《月令》與《夏小正》一樣,屬于政令性文獻。從《月令》所載物候來判斷,它應該是戰(zhàn)國時期黃河中下游地區(qū)諸侯國的太史所著。秦漢以降,太史職權(quán)變遷,地位下降,因此再也沒有出現(xiàn)類似《月令》那樣的著述。原來那種政令、陰陽五行、物候、星象歷法混為一體的"月令"轉(zhuǎn)而分別形成律令、農(nóng)書、陰陽五行等類型的著述,而后世"月令"則以法令、詔書的形式頒布,從學術(shù)史角度來觀察,相對單純的有關(guān)農(nóng)事的著述——農(nóng)書——秦漢之后發(fā)展成為獨立的門類。
[Abstract]:The original creator of "Yue Ling" was not a Confucian scholar, but it was Dai Sheng of the Han Dynasty who incorporated it into the Book of Rites to become a Confucian classic. However, it had no typical Confucian thought, and its etiquette was not Confucian etiquette, so the writing language was very different from the Confucian writings of the Pre-Qin Dynasty. Certainly not written in the Qin and Han dynasties. The "moon order" is centered on the political order, closely unifying the contents of Yin and Yang, the five elements, phenology, and the astrological calendar, which embodies the characteristics of the "decree" of the dynasty. "the order of the moon" is the same as "Xia Xiaozheng". It belongs to the literature of government orders. Judging from the phenology contained in "Yue Ling", it should be the work of the imperial states in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River during the warring States period. Therefore, there is no such writing as "lunar decree". The original "lunar order", which is a mixture of political decrees, yin and yang five elements, phenology, and astrological calendar, has been transformed into legal orders, agricultural books, yin and yang five elements, and other types of writings. In the form of decrees and imperial edict, from the point of view of academic history, the monumental order of later generations developed into an independent category after the relatively simple writings on agriculture-agricultural books-Qin and Han dynasties.
【基金】：2012年度國家社科基金重大招標項目“中國禮制變遷及其現(xiàn)代價值研究”(12&ZD134)的階段性成果
【分類號】：K892.9

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張玲;;中國古代農(nóng)書的分類與著錄[J];山東省農(nóng)業(yè)管理干部學院學報;2011年06期

2 劉毓tT;;我國古代的農(nóng)書[J];讀書月報;1956年09期

3 師道剛;孫益力;王朝中;;從三部農(nóng)書看元朝農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)[J];山西大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1979年03期

4 王永厚;;中國農(nóng)書在國外[J];農(nóng)業(yè)考古;1983年01期

5 王建華;;古農(nóng)書現(xiàn)代價值考略[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2011年27期

6 劉毓tT;;我國古農(nóng)書述要[J];歷史教學;1962年07期

7 方蓬;;從中國古代農(nóng)書看農(nóng)事信仰[J];青島農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2011年01期

8 王福昌;;中國古代農(nóng)書的鄉(xiāng)村社會史料價值——以《齊民要術(shù)》和《四時纂要》為例[J];北京林業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2013年03期

9 田利;;古籍中農(nóng)業(yè)文獻記載與分類考略[J];農(nóng)業(yè)考古;2009年04期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 孫穎;漢唐間古農(nóng)書的研究[D];東北師范大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1611019