本文選題：蒙古　切入點(diǎn)：金朝　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目前學(xué)界對(duì)于大蒙古國(guó)建立后的蒙金關(guān)系少有研究，雖也有一些成果對(duì)此方面有所涉及，但主要關(guān)注蒙金雙方的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，鮮有著作或文章對(duì)雙方使者往來進(jìn)行專門研究。本文通過蒙金相互派出使者的使者出使次數(shù)、使者出使使命、使者在蒙金關(guān)系中的作用等三方面，對(duì)蒙金使者往來進(jìn)行專門研究。 本文根據(jù)對(duì)相關(guān)史料的爬梳、考證、統(tǒng)計(jì)，在學(xué)界相關(guān)研究的基礎(chǔ)之上，認(rèn)為在1206年大蒙古國(guó)建立至1234年金朝滅亡期間，蒙古使者出使金朝27次、金朝使者出使蒙古35次，雙方使者往來共62次。蒙金使者的往來本文根據(jù)其使命的不同進(jìn)行分類，蒙古出使金朝的使者可以分為：以朝貢為使命出使金朝；以偵察為使命出使金朝；以索幣、索人、索地、請(qǐng)婚為使命出使金朝；以宣諭、責(zé)問為使命出使金朝；以諭降、議和為使命出使金朝。金朝的使者可以分為：以宣諭、責(zé)問為使命出使蒙古；以吊慰為使命出使蒙古；以通好、議和為使命出使蒙古。蒙金使者都為執(zhí)行本方政權(quán)的外交政策發(fā)揮了重要的作用，使者個(gè)人能力雖存在著或高或低的差別，但其所起作用的大小并非由自身能力所決定，，而是由其政權(quán)的綜合實(shí)力決定的。蒙古使者的作用可以概括為以下幾點(diǎn)：示弱于人，使金朝放松警惕；獲取情報(bào)，為攻金提供有利條件；恫嚇金朝，從金朝榨取物質(zhì)利益；議和為辭，打亂金朝軍事部署。相對(duì)而言，金朝使者的作用可以概括為以下兩點(diǎn)：實(shí)現(xiàn)暫時(shí)和平，為金朝休整軍備提供時(shí)間；有辱使命，招致蒙古進(jìn)攻。 在蒙金使者的往來中，蒙古憑借不斷增強(qiáng)的綜合實(shí)力，在雙方關(guān)系中逐漸取代金朝占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位，并最終滅亡了金朝。
[Abstract]:At present, scholars have done little research on the relationship between Mongolia and gold after the establishment of Great Mongolia. Although there are some achievements in this respect, they are mainly concerned about the war between the two sides. Few works or articles have made a special study on the exchange of emissaries between the two sides. In this paper, there are three aspects: the number of emissaries sent to each other, the mission of emissaries, and the role of emissaries in the relationship between the two emissaries. To conduct special research on the exchange of Mongolian gold emissaries. Based on the relevant historical data, research and statistics, and on the basis of relevant academic research, this paper holds that during the period from the establishment of the Great Mongolia in 1206 to the demise of the Jin Dynasty in 1234, the Mongolian emissaries sent out the Jin Dynasty 27 times, and the Jin Dynasty emissaries sent out Mongolia 35 times. There are 62 exchanges between the emissaries of the two sides. According to the different missions of the Mongolian emissaries, the emissaries of the Jin Dynasty can be divided into three groups: paying tribute as the mission, sending out the Jin Dynasty with the mission of reconnaissance, sending out the Jin Dynasty with the mission of reconnaissance, and asking for money and people. Sudi, please marry as the mission of the Jin Dynasty; to declare an encyclical, to ask for the mission of the Jin Dynasty; to the encyclical surrender, discussion of the mission of the Jin Dynasty. The envoys of the Jin Dynasty can be divided into: to declare an encyclical, to ask for the mission to send Mongolia; to comfort as the mission of the mission of Mongolia; In order to make a good pass, to negotiate and to send Mongolia for his mission. Mongol Jin emissary has played an important role in carrying out the foreign policy of his regime. Although there is a difference between the personal abilities of the emissary, whether high or low, But the size of its role is not determined by its own ability, but by the overall strength of its regime. The role of the Mongolian emissary can be summed up as the following: showing weakness and making Jin dynasty relax his vigilance; and obtaining information. To provide favorable conditions for the attack on gold; to intimidate the Jin Dynasty, to extract material benefits from the Jin Dynasty; to negotiate peace and disrupt the military arrangements of the Jin Dynasty; comparatively speaking, the role of the emissary of the Jin Dynasty can be summed up as the following two points: to achieve temporary peace, To provide time for the Jin Dynasty to rearm; humiliate the mission, leading to Mongolia's attack. In the exchange of Mongolian and Jin emissaries, Mongolia gradually replaced the Jin Dynasty as the dominant position in the bilateral relations by virtue of its increasing comprehensive strength, and finally destroyed the Jin Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：K246.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董克昌;大金對(duì)四鄰關(guān)系的總方針與總趨勢(shì)[J];北方文物;1993年04期

2 楊志玖;補(bǔ)元史札八兒火者傳[J];回族研究;1991年03期

3 朱清澤 ,李鵬貴;從蒙金戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)看成吉思汗的戰(zhàn)略戰(zhàn)術(shù)[J];民族研究;1984年06期

4 王路;論述成吉思汗對(duì)中原的政策[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(文史哲版);1990年06期

5 巴雅爾;金國(guó)的民族關(guān)系和成吉思汗的對(duì)金戰(zhàn)略[J];內(nèi)蒙古師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1981年03期

6 孟克;成吉思汗南下伐金淺議[J];內(nèi)蒙古師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1981年03期

7 布林;成吉思汗事略[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué);1980年03期

8 任崇岳;論蒙金關(guān)系[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)輯刊;1986年06期

9 陳高華;說蒙古滅金的三峰山戰(zhàn)役[J];文史哲;1981年03期

10 王宏志;;金后期的抗蒙斗爭(zhēng)及其失敗原因[J];中南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1984年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 金寶麗;蒙古滅金史事研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：1601834