【摘要】：羅伯特·考克斯與安德魯·林克萊特分別是國際批判理論內(nèi)部兩個(gè)主要流派的領(lǐng)軍人物�？伎怂菇梃b葛蘭西的"霸權(quán)"理論,林克萊特吸收體現(xiàn)于哈貝馬斯的交往行動理論和埃利亞斯的"過程社會學(xué)"中的"對話"觀點(diǎn),分別構(gòu)建了自己的理論體系,在不同的方向上發(fā)展了國際批判理論。兩位學(xué)者在理論淵源、對主流理論的批判、國際體系的結(jié)構(gòu)變遷和實(shí)現(xiàn)人類解放的前景等問題的看法上有某些共通之處,同時(shí)存在不可忽視的差異。這也反映了國際批判理論內(nèi)部兩個(gè)主要流派之間不同的研究旨趣。兩位學(xué)者對于文明問題的共同興趣也意味兩個(gè)流派之間可以進(jìn)行有意義的對話。
[Abstract]:Robert Cox and Andrew Linklater are two main schools of international critical theory. Cox draws lessons from Gramsci's "hegemony" theory, Linklater absorbs the views of "dialogue" embodied in Habermas's theory of communication action and Elyas's "sociology of process", and constructs his own theoretical system, respectively. International critical theory has been developed in different directions. The two scholars have some common views on the theoretical origin, criticism of the mainstream theories, the structural changes of the international system and the prospect of the realization of human liberation, and there are some differences that can not be ignored at the same time. This also reflects the different research purport between the two main schools of international critical theory. The common interest of the two scholars in the issue of civilization also means a meaningful dialogue between the two schools.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)政府管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D091

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 柏鵬;奧斯特羅果爾斯基政黨思想研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2299454