共同體思想視域下的中國現(xiàn)代政治價值選擇
[Abstract]:Political value is the reflection of different political interests. Political value has the characteristics of historicity, situational, regional and abstract. Different time and space backgrounds, historical and cultural traditions, social situations will produce different political values, but in the context of globalization and informationization, in the past, isolated communities have little influence on each other. Political values are bound to adapt to the changing social realities and reflect a certain degree of theoretical advance. Political modernization is not only reflected in the design and operation of the system, but more importantly, it must have a set of political values with modern flavor.
In the context of the economic crisis, people do not reflect on the liberal concept; while China is in the process of modernization, the developed countries began to reflect on the modernization itself; whether the Confucian concept that once ruled China for thousands of years has vitality, whether China's progress is bound to be at the cost of the complete abandonment of Confucian ideas, and so on are highlighted. The abstraction of value makes the interpretation of value highly subjective. The interpretation of political value from the perspective of community provides us with a new perspective. On the one hand, the emergence of communism as a school is relatively late, and the perspective it provides is somewhat novel. On the other hand, when discussing political value from the perspective of community, we can avoid the dichotomy of either liberal perspective or traditional Confucian cultural perspective when discussing the alternative resources of Chinese modern political value, and the idea of community can well link up the western community, Confucianism and Marxism.
Starting from the reality of the great transformation of Chinese society, this paper takes the idea of community as the main thread throughout the article. Finally, it studies and judges the options of Chinese modern political value, thus constituting the basic framework of the article, as follows:
The introduction mainly expounds the social background and social significance of the study of Chinese modern political value, explores the causes of the problem, what kind of value-based, alternative value sets and so on, evaluates the general situation of academic research on communism, Confucian communitarianism and values, defines relevant concepts, and introduces the purpose of the study. Innovations and shortcomings.
The first chapter mainly discusses the background of China's social transformation. In a word, the background China is facing includes the following aspects: the establishment of the market economic system, the long historical tradition, the advanced and backward international environment, the domestic environment of the powerful country and the weak society, the socialist political system, and the reconstruction. These six factors provide the motive force and alternative value set for the choice of modern political value in China, and are the prerequisite for the choice of modern political value.
Chapter Two explores the Western Communitarianism in detail. This paper interprets communitarianism from the perspective of the comparison between communitarianism and liberalism, and divides their arguments into three parts: the individual-based and the community-based, justice takes precedence over good and good over justice, state neutrality and state activeness. The development of corporatism can be found that ancient Greek polis, democracy and Roman Republic are the ideological roots of modern communism. Although it came into being relatively late, it has a deep historical foundation. Its value is not simply reflected in being a critic of liberalism, on the contrary, communism and Roman republicanism are the ideological roots of modern communism. Liberalism constitutes a cultural tradition of the West and is a complement to liberalism.
The third chapter studies Confucianism.Because of the inseparability of politics and ethics in ancient China,political thought and philosophical thought are intertwined.The article holds that when interpreting Confucianism,it is necessary to distinguish institutional Confucianism from ideological Confucianism.This article focuses on Ideological Confucianism.Because Confucianism has a long history,this chapter is based on Confucianism in China. It can be simply divided into the Yuan Dynasty (mainly pre-Qin Dynasty), the developing period (Han to Ming Dynasty), and the late Ming Dynasty. Confucian political thought contains positive factors that transcend the times. These factors do not lag behind with the development of the times. They are embodied in the emphasis on the rule of virtue, harmonious relations and personal moral cultivation. Not to be overlooked.
The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of Marx's communitarianism.Marx's communitarianism is based on the Marxist "human" concept.A comprehensive analysis shows that Marxists put forward three kinds of communities:natural community,illusory community and real community.Among them,real community is the ideal social state of Marxism. The thought of communitarianism expresses distinct national thought, just thought and free thought. These thoughts are an important part of Marxism and also the ideological source of modern Chinese political value.
Based on the analysis of the first four chapters, the fifth chapter firstly explores the present situation of Chinese social value, which is manifested by the loss of core values and the weakening of core political values as a part of social values. In addition, these six values should also be the core elements of constructing China's political value system.
The conclusion makes clear that the choice of Chinese modern political value must be combined with the construction of socialist core value system, and promotes the construction of Chinese modern political value system under the guidance of socialist core value system. However, in the process of research, we are confronted with such dilemmas as complex and diverse values, communitarianism, Confucian communitarianism, space-time differences of Marxist communitarianism, complexity and diversity of China's national conditions, which constitute the potential factors to weaken the research results.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中共中央黨校
【學(xué)位級別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D09
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳周旺;論共同體主義對當(dāng)代西方自由主義的批判[J];現(xiàn)代哲學(xué);2000年02期
2 李建兵;共同體主義:批判中尋求存續(xù)空間[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2004年03期
3 王曰美;近30年儒家政治思想研究[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2004年06期
4 王曰美;近三十年儒家政治思想研究[J];煙臺師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期
5 胡偉希;;“社群主義”析義[J];新視野;2006年01期
6 龔群;;德沃金的共同體觀念[J];倫理學(xué)研究;2010年04期
7 趙俊;;國際關(guān)系中的共同體與共同體主義[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2008年12期
8 李義天;;共同體與公民美德[J];天津行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年03期
9 張學(xué)軍;;歐洲的共同體與共同體主義[J];中國圖書評論;2010年07期
10 崔世廣;日本傳統(tǒng)文化對現(xiàn)代化的雙重作用[J];日本研究;1995年02期
相關(guān)會議論文 前6條
1 秦越存;;現(xiàn)代性倫理危機與西方共同體主義的困境[A];“第二屆中國倫理學(xué)青年論壇”暨“首屆中國倫理學(xué)十大杰出青年學(xué)者頒獎大會”論文集[C];2012年
2 王凌云;;論保護[A];全國“當(dāng)代西方哲學(xué)的新進展”學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文匯編[C];2008年
3 東方朔;;德性論與儒家倫理[A];當(dāng)代中國:發(fā)展·安全·價值——第二屆(2004年度)上海市社會科學(xué)界學(xué)術(shù)年會文集 (下)[C];2004年
4 周菲;;當(dāng)代歐美公共哲學(xué)研究述評[A];繁榮·和諧·振興——遼寧省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)首屆學(xué)術(shù)年會獲獎成果文集[C];2007年
5 陳惠雄;;主義與問題:新自由主義辨析——兼論“主體-社會”互構(gòu)的人本經(jīng)濟哲學(xué)理論向度[A];中華外國經(jīng)濟學(xué)說研究會第十四次學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文摘要文集[C];2006年
6 秦越存;;解決現(xiàn)代西方倫理危機的實踐哲學(xué)進路[A];中國倫理學(xué)三十年——中國倫理學(xué)會第七次全國會員代表大會暨學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文匯編[C];2009年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 本報記者 張波邋施燕秋;“和諧太湖”該如何構(gòu)建?[N];蘇州日報;2007年
2 資琳;契約的死亡與重生[N];檢察日報;2005年
3 鐘國興;“率先”的使命與新的探索[N];學(xué)習(xí)時報;2006年
4 熊宗哲;堅持法治與德治相結(jié)合[N];湖南日報;2001年
5 吉林省委黨校研究員 蔣京議;科學(xué)建立社會主義核心價值體系需要處理好三個關(guān)系[N];中國經(jīng)濟時報;2009年
6 夏巍 山東大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;查爾斯·泰勒的思想肖像[N];中國社會科學(xué)報;2010年
7 信浮研究院研究員 秋風(fēng);我們需要“適度的”福利體系[N];中國經(jīng)營報;2010年
8 彭國華;商談倫理學(xué)的價值與現(xiàn)實際遇[N];人民日報;2009年
9 西北民族大學(xué)管理學(xué)院教授 王澤民;晏嬰的經(jīng)濟管理思想[N];甘肅日報;2009年
10 本報記者 袁婷;“孔子熱”引發(fā)國學(xué)爭論[N];民主與法制時報;2010年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 臧豪杰;共同體思想視域下的中國現(xiàn)代政治價值選擇[D];中共中央黨校;2012年
2 葛紅梅;桑德爾公共哲學(xué)思想研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年
3 楊帆;自然權(quán)利理論研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年
4 韓升;查爾斯·泰勒對共同體生活的追求[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年
5 郭臺輝;齊格蒙特·鮑曼思想中的個體與政治[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2006年
6 楊曉暢;多元社會的正義事業(yè)[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
7 胡道玖;可行能力:阿馬蒂亞·森經(jīng)濟倫理方法研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年
8 李義天;當(dāng)代美德倫理學(xué)研究:關(guān)于倫理多樣性的論證與辯護[D];清華大學(xué);2006年
9 孟慶壘;環(huán)境責(zé)任論[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2008年
10 張奇峰;以“道德自我”概念為核心的杜威道德哲學(xué)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 王溪;儒家政治思想的實踐困境[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年
2 杜春萍;論曹一士的儒家政治社會主張[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年
3 周運;論徐復(fù)觀的融通民主觀及其當(dāng)代價值[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2012年
4 畢建宏;蘇格蘭啟蒙運動中的商業(yè)秩序與公民美德[D];北京大學(xué);2006年
5 楊彥斌;追尋美德[D];西北大學(xué);2009年
6 裴森;經(jīng)濟全球化和全球倫理——“普世價值”問題的理性省思[D];南京大學(xué);2011年
7 王棟;正義首要性思想:批判與建構(gòu)[D];四川省社會科學(xué)院;2008年
8 張赫然;儒家政治倫理的現(xiàn)代行政倫理價值[D];長春工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年
9 郁靖子;尋求公民德性[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年
10 劉暢;國際商事仲裁的社會基礎(chǔ)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年
本文編號:2216295
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2216295.html