本文選題：民族 + 人民��； 參考：《中國社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年07期

【摘要】：人類學(xué)關(guān)于"民族"(nation)的界說,通常會(huì)提及共同的語言、風(fēng)俗、文化傳統(tǒng)和歷史記憶等要素。但這些要素也都見于"族群"(ethnic groups)。概念史考察表明,"nation"一詞是通過一場復(fù)雜的話語競爭進(jìn)入近代歐洲政治語境的。在這個(gè)過程中,其意涵的確定受到了現(xiàn)代性國家建構(gòu)的深刻影響:共同的"地域"被看作是國家的"領(lǐng)土",共同的"語言"是書同文意義的"國語",至于共同的"起源"、"文脈"和"記憶",事實(shí)上也通過國家編年史的書寫及相關(guān)文學(xué)表象而得到了重塑。法國大革命《人權(quán)宣言》第三條關(guān)于國家主權(quán)寄托于"民族"的憲法性規(guī)定,提供了一個(gè)民族論述的經(jīng)典政治版本。據(jù)此,作為政治共同體的"民族"必須基于領(lǐng)土型國家的大空間尺度來定義,而生活在領(lǐng)土型國家范圍內(nèi)的諸多"族群",則只能被理解為文化意義的人群共同體。
[Abstract]:Anthropological definitions of "nationality" often refer to elements such as common languages, customs, cultural traditions and historical memories. But these elements are also found in ethnic groups. The study of concept history shows that the word "nation" entered the modern European political context through a complicated discourse competition. In the process, The definition of its meaning is deeply influenced by the construction of modern country: the common "region" is regarded as the "territory" of the country, the common "language" is the "national language" of the same meaning of the book, and the common "origin", "context" And memory, in fact, has been reshaped through the writing of the national chronicle and related literary representations. Article 3 of the Declaration of Human Rights of the French Revolution provides a classic political version of the national discourse. Therefore, as a political community, a "nation" must be defined on the basis of the large spatial scale of a territorial state, while many "ethnic groups" living in a territorial state can only be understood as a community of people of cultural significance.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)政府管理學(xué)院;南京大學(xué)學(xué)衡研究院;
【基金】：教育部重大攻關(guān)項(xiàng)目“中國話語體系建設(shè)與全球治理研究”(項(xiàng)目編號16JZD008)階段性成果
【分類號】：D091.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鄒魯清;;淺論國家與社會(huì)的關(guān)系[J];企業(yè)家天地;2005年08期

，

本文編號：1795606