比較政治視野中的族群沖突管理——國外主要族群政策比較分析
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-22 12:30
本文選題:族群沖突 + 沖突管理; 參考:《學(xué)術(shù)界》2013年12期
【摘要】:族群沖突涉及國家與族群、族群與族群之間的關(guān)系。當(dāng)代世界有兩個(gè)因素可以引發(fā)一國內(nèi)部族群之間的緊張:一是經(jīng)濟(jì)開發(fā)進(jìn)程中族群之間競爭國家資源;二是國家權(quán)力被某一個(gè)主體族群所控制,從而可能引發(fā)其他族群的政治反應(yīng)。世界各國治理族群沖突的政策各異,按照政策目標(biāo)的不同,大致可以分為三種類型:一為同化或吸納;二為排斥;三為多元主義。從民族國家的觀點(diǎn)來看,同化看似具有吸引力,但強(qiáng)制同化往往引發(fā)族群不滿和沖突;種族屠殺、文化滅絕、種族隔離是排斥政策的常見形式,已遭世界上秉持人權(quán)與正義的國家的普遍拋棄;多元主義族群政策路徑選擇多樣,是當(dāng)前多數(shù)國家都采用的政策。在當(dāng)代多元主義越來越走強(qiáng)的條件下,多族群國家的族際政治整合只能是多維的、復(fù)雜的政治整合。
[Abstract]:Ethnic conflict involves the relationship between the state and the ethnic group, and between the ethnic group and the ethnic group. There are two factors in the contemporary world that can lead to tensions among ethnic groups within a country: one is competition for national resources among ethnic groups in the process of economic development, the other is that state power is controlled by one of the main ethnic groups. This could trigger political reactions from other ethnic groups. According to the different policy objectives, the countries in the world can be divided into three types: assimilation or absorption, exclusion and pluralism. From the point of view of a nation-State, assimilation may seem attractive, but forced assimilation often leads to ethnic discontent and conflict; genocide, cultural genocide and apartheid are common forms of exclusion policies, It has been abandoned by the countries that uphold human rights and justice in the world. Under the condition of increasing pluralism, the inter-ethnic political integration of multi-ethnic countries can only be multidimensional and complex political integration.
【作者單位】: 中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院民族學(xué)與人類學(xué)研究所;
【分類號(hào)】:C95;D0
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 常士,
本文編號(hào):1787225
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/1787225.html
最近更新
教材專著