基于展開(kāi)反應(yīng)機(jī)制的人格量表編制:以大學(xué)生性格傾向量表為例
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-06-22 11:18
【摘要】:目的:基于拓廣等級(jí)展開(kāi)模型(簡(jiǎn)稱GGUM)編制大學(xué)生性格傾向量表(簡(jiǎn)稱CTS-GGUM),并與基于因素分析方法構(gòu)建的量表(簡(jiǎn)稱CTS-FA)進(jìn)行比較,探索基于展開(kāi)反應(yīng)機(jī)制編制人格量表的可行性。方法:根據(jù)三所大學(xué)1209名有效被試的作答數(shù)據(jù),分別基于GGUM與因素分析方法進(jìn)行量表編制并作比較。結(jié)果:CTS-GGUM保留了更多的中段項(xiàng)目,內(nèi)容效度為0.718,效標(biāo)關(guān)聯(lián)效度為0.699,同質(zhì)性信度為0.740,其中同質(zhì)信度與效標(biāo)關(guān)聯(lián)效度略低于CTS-FA。結(jié)論:基于展開(kāi)反應(yīng)機(jī)制編制人格量表具有可行性,它有更好的被試區(qū)分能力,并能提高特質(zhì)中段被試的測(cè)量精度。
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop the personality tendency scale (CTS-GGUM) for college students based on the extended hierarchical expansion model (GGUM) and compare it with the scale based on factor analysis (CTS-FA), so as to explore the feasibility of compiling personality scale based on deployment response mechanism. Methods: according to the data of 1209 valid subjects in three universities, the scale was compiled and compared based on GGUM and factor analysis. Results: CTS-GGUM retained more midcourse items, the content validity was 0.718, the association validity was 0.699, and the homogeneity reliability was 0.740. The homogeneity reliability and validity were slightly lower than those of CTS-FA.. Conclusion: it is feasible to compile personality scale based on unfolding response mechanism. It has better ability to distinguish subjects and can improve the measurement accuracy of subjects in the middle of trait.
【作者單位】: 集美大學(xué)教師教育學(xué)院;江西師范大學(xué)心理學(xué)院;
【基金】:集美大學(xué)博士啟動(dòng)基金項(xiàng)目:基于項(xiàng)目反應(yīng)理論(IRT)展開(kāi)模型的人格量表編制研究(Q201408) 福建省教育廳社科類項(xiàng)目:人格量表編制的三種方法比較(JAS14166)
【分類號(hào)】:B848.6
本文編號(hào):2504530
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop the personality tendency scale (CTS-GGUM) for college students based on the extended hierarchical expansion model (GGUM) and compare it with the scale based on factor analysis (CTS-FA), so as to explore the feasibility of compiling personality scale based on deployment response mechanism. Methods: according to the data of 1209 valid subjects in three universities, the scale was compiled and compared based on GGUM and factor analysis. Results: CTS-GGUM retained more midcourse items, the content validity was 0.718, the association validity was 0.699, and the homogeneity reliability was 0.740. The homogeneity reliability and validity were slightly lower than those of CTS-FA.. Conclusion: it is feasible to compile personality scale based on unfolding response mechanism. It has better ability to distinguish subjects and can improve the measurement accuracy of subjects in the middle of trait.
【作者單位】: 集美大學(xué)教師教育學(xué)院;江西師范大學(xué)心理學(xué)院;
【基金】:集美大學(xué)博士啟動(dòng)基金項(xiàng)目:基于項(xiàng)目反應(yīng)理論(IRT)展開(kāi)模型的人格量表編制研究(Q201408) 福建省教育廳社科類項(xiàng)目:人格量表編制的三種方法比較(JAS14166)
【分類號(hào)】:B848.6
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 ;你的性格傾向是怎樣的[J];文苑(萌);2013年01期
2 吳克求;;兒童的性格傾向與引導(dǎo)[J];父母必讀;1989年09期
3 鄭日昌;對(duì)我國(guó)甲級(jí)女子排球運(yùn)動(dòng)員性格傾向的測(cè)驗(yàn)研究[J];心理科學(xué)通訊;1984年03期
4 李寧;對(duì)我國(guó)健將級(jí)體操運(yùn)動(dòng)員的性格傾向、部分條件反射速度和準(zhǔn)確性特征的初步研究[J];心理科學(xué)通訊;1987年06期
5 韓恩榮;;固原師專學(xué)生意志特征的調(diào)查[J];固原師專學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1982年03期
6 馮志穎;;不良心理漫談(十三) 孤獨(dú)心理[J];開(kāi)卷有益(求醫(yī)問(wèn)藥);2010年01期
7 張海霞;;藏、漢、裕固族中學(xué)生應(yīng)對(duì)方式與性格傾向的關(guān)系——基于多民族混合學(xué)校學(xué)生心理素質(zhì)的研究[J];天水師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期
8 ;你會(huì)坐在誰(shuí)身邊[J];東方少年(陽(yáng)光閱讀版);2006年08期
9 王志祥;從嘴唇看人的心理與健康[J];心理世界;1999年03期
10 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號(hào):2504530
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2504530.html
最近更新
教材專著