中國父母教養(yǎng)方式評價量表（父母版）的初步編制
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-12 13:02
【摘要】：目的：編制一套符合中國國情的且由父母填寫的，具有較好操作性、有效性、代表性的父母教養(yǎng)方式評價量表，并檢驗量表的信度和效度，為中國父母教養(yǎng)方式提供可靠的評價工具。 方法：本研究從父母教養(yǎng)方式的內(nèi)容出發(fā)，結(jié)合文獻綜述結(jié)果和專家意見，初步形成了初始問卷和理論結(jié)構(gòu)，并進行了預(yù)實驗。對初始問卷進行項目分析（包括題項與總分相關(guān)、決斷值、題項刪除后的a值、校正題項與總分相關(guān)、因素負荷量及共同性六大指標）和探索性因素分析，最終確定了中國父母教養(yǎng)方式評價量表（父母版）的正式問卷。使用正式問卷再次施測，采用克朗巴赫系數(shù)、分半信度法、相關(guān)系數(shù)法及驗證性因素分析法檢驗量表的信效度。 結(jié)果：（1）項目分析刪除了質(zhì)量不高的28個條目，探索性因素分析共提取了五個公因子，累積方差貢獻率為50.51%，五個公因子分別命名為：民主關(guān)懷、專制粗暴、寬容理解、情感聯(lián)系和管教引導(dǎo)。（2）量表信度檢驗結(jié)果為克朗巴赫系數(shù)為0.917，分半信度系數(shù)為0.731。（3）量表的效度檢驗，維度層面間的相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.301到0.629之間，各維度與總量表間的相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.695到0.857之間。（4）驗證性因素分析結(jié)果顯示，中國父母教養(yǎng)方式評價量表（父母版）的模型在主要的擬合指標上基本都達到了擬合優(yōu)度的要求，其中RMSEA為0.059，χ2自由度比為2.430，GFI、CFI及TLI分別為0.765、0.736及0.723。（5）初步編制了由52個條目、5個維度構(gòu)成的中國父母教養(yǎng)方式評價量表（父母版）。 結(jié)論：本量表的內(nèi)容區(qū)分度較好，符合心理測量學(xué)要求；信度指標均達到了測量學(xué)的要求；結(jié)構(gòu)效度良好，與理論構(gòu)想基本吻合；該量表能夠反映我國父母教養(yǎng)方式的現(xiàn)狀及特征，形成的正式量表對我國父母教養(yǎng)方式的評估提供了有效的測量工具。
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop a set of parental rearing style evaluation scale, which is suitable for China's national conditions and filled out by parents, which has good operability, effectiveness and representativeness, and to test the reliability and validity of the scale. To provide a reliable evaluation tool for Chinese parenting style. Methods: starting from the content of parental rearing style, combining the literature review results and expert opinions, the initial questionnaire and theoretical structure were preliminarily formed, and preliminary experiments were carried out. Item analysis (including item correlation with total score, decision value, a value after item deletion, correlation between correction item and total score, factor load and commonality) and exploratory factor analysis were carried out on the initial questionnaire. Finally, the formal questionnaire of Chinese Parental rearing style Evaluation scale (Parental version) was determined. The formal questionnaire was used to test the reliability and validity of the scale by using the Cronbach coefficient, split-half reliability method, correlation coefficient method and confirmatory factor analysis method. Results: (1) the item analysis deleted 28 items of low quality, and exploratory factor analysis extracted five common factors, the contribution rate of cumulative variance was 50.51, and the five common factors were named democratic care, despotic and brutal, respectively. (2) the reliability of the scale was 0.917, and the split-half reliability was 0.731. (3) the validity of the scale. The correlation coefficient between dimension and dimension is between 0.301 and 0.629, and between dimension and total table is between 0.695 and 0.857. (4) confirmatory factor analysis results show that, The Chinese Parental rearing style Evaluation scale (Parental version) model basically reached the requirement of goodness of fit in the main fitting indexes, in which RMSEA was 0.059, 蠂 2 degree of freedom ratio was 2.430% GFI, The CFI and TLI were 0.765, 0.736 and 0.723 respectively. (5) the Chinese Parental rearing style Evaluation scale (Parental version), which consisted of 52 items and 5 dimensions, was preliminarily compiled. Conclusion: the content differentiation of this scale is good, which accords with the requirement of psychometrics, the reliability index is up to the requirement of measurement, the structure validity is good, and it is basically consistent with the theoretical conception. This scale can reflect the present situation and characteristics of Chinese parents' rearing style, and the formal scale can provide an effective measurement tool for the evaluation of Chinese parents' rearing style.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：皖南醫(yī)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G78
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop a set of parental rearing style evaluation scale, which is suitable for China's national conditions and filled out by parents, which has good operability, effectiveness and representativeness, and to test the reliability and validity of the scale. To provide a reliable evaluation tool for Chinese parenting style. Methods: starting from the content of parental rearing style, combining the literature review results and expert opinions, the initial questionnaire and theoretical structure were preliminarily formed, and preliminary experiments were carried out. Item analysis (including item correlation with total score, decision value, a value after item deletion, correlation between correction item and total score, factor load and commonality) and exploratory factor analysis were carried out on the initial questionnaire. Finally, the formal questionnaire of Chinese Parental rearing style Evaluation scale (Parental version) was determined. The formal questionnaire was used to test the reliability and validity of the scale by using the Cronbach coefficient, split-half reliability method, correlation coefficient method and confirmatory factor analysis method. Results: (1) the item analysis deleted 28 items of low quality, and exploratory factor analysis extracted five common factors, the contribution rate of cumulative variance was 50.51, and the five common factors were named democratic care, despotic and brutal, respectively. (2) the reliability of the scale was 0.917, and the split-half reliability was 0.731. (3) the validity of the scale. The correlation coefficient between dimension and dimension is between 0.301 and 0.629, and between dimension and total table is between 0.695 and 0.857. (4) confirmatory factor analysis results show that, The Chinese Parental rearing style Evaluation scale (Parental version) model basically reached the requirement of goodness of fit in the main fitting indexes, in which RMSEA was 0.059, 蠂 2 degree of freedom ratio was 2.430% GFI, The CFI and TLI were 0.765, 0.736 and 0.723 respectively. (5) the Chinese Parental rearing style Evaluation scale (Parental version), which consisted of 52 items and 5 dimensions, was preliminarily compiled. Conclusion: the content differentiation of this scale is good, which accords with the requirement of psychometrics, the reliability index is up to the requirement of measurement, the structure validity is good, and it is basically consistent with the theoretical conception. This scale can reflect the present situation and characteristics of Chinese parents' rearing style, and the formal scale can provide an effective measurement tool for the evaluation of Chinese parents' rearing style.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：皖南醫(yī)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G78
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陸碧梅;謝巧慶;梁海華;黃敏英;陳靜蓉;;父母教養(yǎng)方式干預(yù)對多動癥兒童的影響[J];現(xiàn)代臨床護理;2006年05期
2 張繼華;;學(xué)齡前兒童父母教養(yǎng)方式的調(diào)查[J];公共衛(wèi)生與預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2006年05期
3 石彩虹;;父母教養(yǎng)方式與大學(xué)生自我和諧的關(guān)系[J];繼續(xù)教育研究;2008年06期
4 李麗英;李淑環(huán);;醫(yī)學(xué)高職生的生活滿意度與自尊、父母教養(yǎng)方式的關(guān)系[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究與教育;2009年03期
5 湯燕妮;朱翠英;;淺談父母教養(yǎng)方式與大學(xué)生應(yīng)對方式[J];當代教育論壇(上半月刊);2009年07期
6 王倩倩;劉丹;杜宇;;父母教養(yǎng)方式、依戀和大學(xué)生抑郁關(guān)系的實證研究[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2010年09期
7 馬s，
本文編號：2327185
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2327185.html
最近更新
教材專著
