虛擬社區(qū)知識(shí)共享行為:先有新穎知識(shí)的影響及作用機(jī)制
[Abstract]:With the development and popularization of Internet technology, the virtual community has been gradually sought after by the vast number of netizens, and has become an important medium for sharing knowledge. The knowledge sharing behavior of netizens is also very important for the development of the community. Therefore, the knowledge sharing of virtual community has been widely concerned by researchers. It mainly includes quantity and quality, the latter mainly focuses on the usefulness, timeliness and accuracy of knowledge, and the novelty of knowledge is also an important indicator of knowledge quality. From the viewpoint of whether there is novel knowledge in the shared knowledge, this study explores its influence on user knowledge sharing behavior (quantity and novelty) and its mechanism, and further explores the influence of the number of new knowledge on it. The design takes whether there is novel knowledge in the shared knowledge as the independent variable, and the quantity and novelty of the subsequent users'shared knowledge (including non-repetitive knowledge and critical knowledge) as the dependent variable. The results show that: (1) the quantity of shared knowledge includes non-repetitive knowledge and non-repetitive knowledge. There is no significant difference between the two levels of independent variables and the quantity of critical knowledge. (2) There is a significant difference between the two levels of novelty of non-repetitive knowledge. Among them, the novelty of shared knowledge can be improved more than that of shared knowledge without novelty, while the novelty of critical knowledge can be improved by sharing novelty knowledge. There was no significant difference between the two-level (ibid.) design of single-factor subjects, with cognitive motivation as the mediating variable and novelty of non-repetitive knowledge as the dependent variable. Three: Using a single-factor five-level design (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 new knowledge first) with the number of new knowledge as an independent variable, and the number and novelty of subsequent users'shared knowledge (including non-repetitive knowledge and critical knowledge) as a dependent variable, the results showed that: (1) in the number of non-repetitive knowledge, there were novel prophets. There is no significant difference in the number of knowledge; (2) There is a significant difference in the number of novelty-first knowledge in critical knowledge, among which, compared with low-level novelty-first knowledge, high-level novelty-first knowledge can improve the number of novelty-first knowledge; (3) In the novelty of non-repetitive knowledge, there is a significant difference in the number of novelty-first knowledge. Significantly, compared with the high level of pre-existing knowledge, the low level of pre-existing novel knowledge can improve its novelty; (4) In the novelty of critical knowledge, there is a significant difference in the number of pre-existing novel knowledge, among which, compared with the low level of pre-existing novel knowledge, the high level of pre-existing novel knowledge is better. To sum up, the conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) whether new knowledge in shared knowledge affects the novelty of non-repetitive knowledge shared by subsequent users. Compared with no new knowledge in shared knowledge, the novelty of shared knowledge with new knowledge can be improved better; (2) whether new knowledge in shared knowledge affects the novelty of non-repetitive knowledge shared by subsequent users. (3) The number of pre-existing novel knowledge affects the novelty of subsequent users sharing non-repetitive knowledge by affecting cognitive motivation. (3) The number of pre-existing novel knowledge affects the novelty of subsequent users sharing non-repetitive knowledge. Compared with the high level of knowledge, the low level of pre-existing novel knowledge can improve subsequent users sharing non-repetitive knowledge better. Knowledge novelty; (4) The number of new knowledge first affects the number and novelty of subsequent users sharing critical knowledge. Compared with the low level, high level of new knowledge first can improve the number and novelty of subsequent users sharing critical knowledge.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:B842.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 吳曉紅;張亞;張建軍;;非交易類虛擬品牌社區(qū)互動(dòng)、歸屬感與知識(shí)共享的關(guān)系[J];蚌埠學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期
2 宋學(xué)峰;趙蔚;高琳;何昌琳;;社交問(wèn)答網(wǎng)站知識(shí)共享的內(nèi)容及社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析——以知乎社區(qū)“在線教育”話題為例[J];現(xiàn)代教育技術(shù);2014年06期
3 趙捧未;馬琳;秦春秀;;虛擬社區(qū)研究綜述[J];情報(bào)理論與實(shí)踐;2013年07期
4 何潔;;高績(jī)效人力資源實(shí)踐如何激發(fā)員工創(chuàng)造力:自我決定視角[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2013年04期
5 劉琦;杜榮;;基于參與動(dòng)機(jī)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)社區(qū)知識(shí)共享質(zhì)量、創(chuàng)新及滿意度關(guān)系研究[J];情報(bào)理論與實(shí)踐;2013年03期
6 吳夢(mèng);白新文;;動(dòng)機(jī)性信息加工理論及其在工業(yè)與組織心理學(xué)中的應(yīng)用[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年11期
7 徐冬莉;江若塵;;關(guān)系資本、知識(shí)共享與虛擬社區(qū)忠誠(chéng)的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題探索;2012年10期
8 鄧衛(wèi)華;易明;王偉軍;;虛擬社區(qū)中基于Tag的知識(shí)協(xié)同機(jī)制——基于豆瓣網(wǎng)社區(qū)的案例研究[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2012年08期
9 王子喜;杜榮;;人際信任和自我效能對(duì)虛擬社區(qū)知識(shí)共享和參與水平的影響研究[J];情報(bào)理論與實(shí)踐;2011年10期
10 李國(guó)鑫;李一軍;陳易思;;虛擬社區(qū)成員線下互動(dòng)對(duì)線上知識(shí)貢獻(xiàn)的影響[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2010年09期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 邱江;頓悟問(wèn)題解決中原型激活的認(rèn)知神經(jīng)機(jī)制[D];西南大學(xué);2007年
2 劉云艷;幼兒好奇心發(fā)展與教育促進(jìn)研究[D];西南師范大學(xué);2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 石金鳳;認(rèn)知?jiǎng)訖C(jī)和社會(huì)動(dòng)機(jī)對(duì)團(tuán)隊(duì)創(chuàng)造力的影響[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2015年
2 史更虎;微博的使用行為預(yù)測(cè)大五人格特質(zhì)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2014年
3 徐樹(shù)鵬;壓力情境下任務(wù)特征和人格因素對(duì)創(chuàng)造力的影響研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2013年
4 錢(qián)晴晴;虛擬社區(qū)中成員參與的影響機(jī)制研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2013年
5 王娜;虛擬品牌社區(qū)顧客參與服務(wù)創(chuàng)新研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2013年
6 張海兵;元記憶監(jiān)測(cè)與創(chuàng)造力的關(guān)系研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年
7 丁俊霞;多媒體環(huán)境中呈現(xiàn)方式和背景音樂(lè)對(duì)中學(xué)生認(rèn)知負(fù)荷的影響[D];河南大學(xué);2010年
8 劉鵬;個(gè)體認(rèn)知需求對(duì)DRM范式中錯(cuò)誤記憶的影響[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2008年
9 章鄭;網(wǎng)絡(luò)社會(huì)資本對(duì)虛擬社區(qū)知識(shí)共享及創(chuàng)新的影響研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2008年
10 趙玲;虛擬社區(qū)中的知識(shí)共享行為研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號(hào):2235003
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2235003.html