【摘要】：工作同盟一直是咨詢的過程與效果研究的重點。臨床研究者們認為工作同盟對咨詢過程與效果有至關(guān)重要的作用。工作同盟的相關(guān)研究已有數(shù)十年的歷史,得到了很多指導(dǎo)實踐的研究結(jié)論,但是其結(jié)構(gòu)不清晰,測量方式單一,這在一定程度上影響了心理咨詢過程-效果的研究。本研究通過探索工作同盟問卷結(jié)構(gòu)的方式確定適合中國文化的測量工作同盟的問卷,引進并驗證新的測量工作同盟的工具,進一步明確工作同盟的結(jié)構(gòu)。國內(nèi)工作同盟的測量多是直接使用WAI系列的問卷。朱旭、江光榮(2011c)的WAQ則立足于中國實際,基于對當(dāng)事人眼中的工作同盟的質(zhì)的研究而編制的工作同盟測量工具。從邏輯上講,此工具應(yīng)比國外的工作同盟量表更加符合中國的文化背景。研究一比較了 WAI-S、WAI-SR以及WAQ的結(jié)構(gòu)效度,得到了 WAQ更適合中國文化背景且能有效地測量工作同盟的研究結(jié)論。研究二引入新的測量工作同盟的工具即操縱桿技術(shù)。操縱桿技術(shù)具有的實時、連續(xù)、客觀等特點,比傳統(tǒng)的問卷式工作同盟測量有明顯的優(yōu)越性。研究二編制操縱桿評定工作同盟的手冊并驗證操縱桿根據(jù)評定手冊評定工作同盟的評定者一致性,結(jié)果表明工作同盟的評定者一致性較高,都在0.68以上。研究三根據(jù)工作同盟評定手冊評定工作同盟,探索操縱桿測量工作同盟的可行性,進一步明確工作同盟的結(jié)構(gòu),研究結(jié)果表明操縱桿可以用于評定工作同盟,其信效度良好,并且操縱桿評定的工作同盟總分與WAQ總分相關(guān)顯著,操縱桿評定的工作同盟總分與目標任務(wù)維度分數(shù)能預(yù)測咨詢效果。工作同盟包括目標任務(wù)、情感聯(lián)接與會談投入三個維度。
[Abstract]:The work alliance has always been the focus of the research on the process and effect of consultation. Clinical researchers believe that work alliances play a vital role in the counseling process and effectiveness. The work alliance has been studied for decades, and many conclusions have been obtained, but its structure is not clear and the measurement method is single, which to some extent affects the research of psychological counseling process-effect. By exploring the structure of the work alliance questionnaire, this study determines the questionnaire of the measurement work alliance suitable for Chinese culture, introduces and verifies the new tool of the measurement work alliance, and further clarifies the structure of the work alliance. The measurement of domestic work alliance is to use the questionnaire of WAI series directly. Zhu Xu, Jiang Guang (2011c)'s WAQ is based on the reality of China, based on the qualitative study of the working alliance in the eyes of the party concerned. Logically, this tool is more suited to China's cultural background than the foreign work alliance scale. By comparing the structural validity of WAI-S,WAI-SR and WAQ, the conclusion is drawn that WAQ is more suitable for Chinese cultural background and can effectively measure the work alliance. The second study introduces a new tool of measuring work alliance, that is, joystick technology. The joystick technique has the characteristics of real-time, continuous and objective, which is superior to the traditional questionnaire work alliance measurement. The second study is to compile the manual of evaluating the working alliance of the joystick and to verify the consistency of the evaluator of the work alliance according to the evaluation manual. The result shows that the consistency of the evaluator of the work alliance is higher than 0.68. The third study assesses the work alliance according to the work alliance evaluation manual, explores the feasibility of the joystick measurement work alliance, further clarifies the structure of the work alliance. The research results show that the joystick can be used to evaluate the work alliance, and its reliability and validity are good. And the total score of work alliance evaluated by joystick is significantly correlated with the total score of WAQ, and the total score of work alliance assessed by joystick and the score of goal task dimension can predict the consulting effect. Work alliance includes three dimensions: target task, emotional connection and meeting input.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B849

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 朱旭;胡岳;江光榮;;心理咨詢中工作同盟的發(fā)展模式與咨詢效果[J];心理學(xué)報;2015年10期

2 胡姝婧;江光榮;;工作同盟和領(lǐng)悟?qū)ψ稍冃Ч挠绊慬J];心理科學(xué);2014年06期

3 牛宏偉;江光榮;郝嘉佳;;心理咨詢中當(dāng)事人工作同盟的發(fā)展及與依戀的關(guān)系[J];中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2013年07期

4 朱旭;江光榮;;工作同盟問卷的編制[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

5 朱旭;江光榮;于麗霞;王銘;;工作同盟的結(jié)構(gòu):基于兩種測量工具的檢驗[J];心理科學(xué);2011年04期

6 朱旭;江光榮;;工作同盟的概念[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2011年02期

7 朱旭;江光榮;;當(dāng)事人眼里的工作同盟:質(zhì)的分析[J];心理學(xué)報;2011年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 朱旭;江光榮;王銘;于麗霞;;兩種工作同盟問卷的國內(nèi)外測量學(xué)指標的對照[A];第十二屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會論文摘要集[C];2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王銘;會談中的當(dāng)事人阻抗研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

2 朱旭;咨詢過程的深度[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2228397