疾病威脅在內(nèi)團體貶低形成中的作用初探
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-26 09:54
【摘要】：目的： 探討個體疾病易感程度和外在疾病線索與內(nèi)團體貶低水平之間的關(guān)系,對疾病威脅在內(nèi)團體貶低形成過程中所起的作用進行初步研究。 研究方法： 采用最小團體范式對被試的分組進行操作,而后完成偏好選擇任務(wù),具體為： 實驗1：采用最小團體范式對被試身份進行分組,之后兩組被試完成對目標身份即人臉面孔的偏好選擇任務(wù)和自身對疾病易感程度的量表,以探討個體疾病易感程度與內(nèi)團體貶低水平之間的關(guān)系。 實驗2：采用最小團體范式對被試身份進行分組,之后兩組被試在不同環(huán)境下完成對目標身份的偏好選擇任務(wù),以探討外在疾病線索與內(nèi)團體貶低水平之間的關(guān)系。 結(jié)果： 實驗1：目標身份主效應(yīng)顯著,F(1,58)=4.44,p0.05,η2=0.07(內(nèi)團體：M=3.82,SD=1.18；外團體：M=4.17,SD=1.12)。被試身份主效應(yīng)不顯著,F(1,58)=0.32,p0.05,η2=0.006。兩者的交互作用不顯著,F(1,58)=0.001,p0.05,η2=0.000。PVD量表總分與被試的內(nèi)團體貶低的程度相關(guān)極顯著,r=0.33,p0.01；因子1是對疾病感染性的感知,它與被試的內(nèi)團體貶低的程度相關(guān)極顯著,r=0.39,p0.01；因子2是細菌厭惡,它與被試的內(nèi)團體貶低的程度相關(guān)極顯著,r=0.39,p0.01。 實驗2：被試身份的主效應(yīng)不顯著,F(1,76)=2.81,p0.05,η2=0.04。疾病線索的主效應(yīng)極顯著,F(1,76)=7.31,p0.01,η2=0.09。疾病環(huán)境條件下的被試的內(nèi)團體貶低程度(M=0.79,SD=0.69)大于控制環(huán)境下的被試的內(nèi)團體貶低程度(M=0.79,SD=0.69)。兩者交互作用不顯著,F(1,76)=1.23,p0.05,η2=0.02。 結(jié)論： 1、當個體對自身感染疾病的擔憂程度越大時,內(nèi)團體貶低現(xiàn)象越明顯。 2、當個體處于一個容易感染疾病的環(huán)境中時,內(nèi)團體貶低現(xiàn)象越明顯。 3、內(nèi)團體貶低與內(nèi)團成員帶來過高的疾病威脅水平有關(guān)。疾病威脅在內(nèi)團體貶低的形成中起到了一定的作用,存在疾病威脅時,內(nèi)團體貶低現(xiàn)象越明顯。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the relationship between individual disease susceptibility, external disease cues and internal group denigration, and to study the role of disease threat in the process of degrade formation. Methods: using the minimal group paradigm to operate the participants' groups, and then completing the preference selection task. Experiment 1: using the minimum group paradigm to group the participants' identity. Then the two groups completed the task of preference selection of the target identity i.e. face and the scale of their susceptibility to disease to explore the relationship between the degree of individual disease susceptibility and the level of internal group denigration. Experiment 2: the participants were divided into two groups using the minimal group paradigm, and then the two groups completed the task of preference selection of the target identity in different environments to explore the relationship between the external disease cues and the level of internal group degrade. Results: in experiment 1, the main effect of target identity was significant: F (1: 58) (4.44, p 0.05, 畏 _ (2) 0.07 (inner group: M = 3.82, SD1. 18; external group: 1. 17, SD1. 12). Results: the main effect of target identity was significant (F (1 / 58) P = 4.44, p = 0.05, 畏 _ 2 = 0.07). The main effect of identity was not significant (F _ (1 / 58) P _ (0.05), 畏 _ (2) 0.006). The interaction between the two was not significant. The total score of 畏 2=0.000.PVD scale was significantly correlated with the degree of debasement of the inner-group in the subjects. Factor 1 was a perception of disease infection, and it was significantly correlated with the degree of debasement of the inner-group in the subjects. Factor 2 was bacterial disgust, and factor 2 was bacterial disgust. It was significantly correlated with the degree of deprecation of the inner-group in the subjects. Experiment 2: the main effect of subjects' identity was not significant (F _ (1 / 76) ~ (2.81) p _ (0.05), 畏 _ (2) = 0.04). The main effect of disease cues is extremely significant: F _ (1 / 76) ~ (7.31) p _ (0.01), 畏 _ 2 ~ (0.09). The degree of inner-group debasement (M0. 79) was higher than that in control environment (M0. 79% SDT 0. 69) under the condition of disease environment (M0. 79% SDT 0. 69), and that in control environment was 0. 69% (M0. 79% SD0. 69). The interaction between the two was not significant (F _ (1 / 76) 1.23 (p 0.05) and 畏 _ (2) (0.02). Conclusion: 1, when the individual is more worried about the disease of his own infection, the phenomenon of internal group debasement is more obvious. 2. When the individual is in an environment prone to infection with the disease, The more obvious the phenomenon of inner-group debasement. 3, the inner-group denigration is related to the high level of disease threat brought by the inner group members. The formation of the disease threat plays a certain role in the formation of the deprecation of the group, and when there is the disease threat, the phenomenon of the internal group denigration is more obvious.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B848;R395
本文編號：2204496
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the relationship between individual disease susceptibility, external disease cues and internal group denigration, and to study the role of disease threat in the process of degrade formation. Methods: using the minimal group paradigm to operate the participants' groups, and then completing the preference selection task. Experiment 1: using the minimum group paradigm to group the participants' identity. Then the two groups completed the task of preference selection of the target identity i.e. face and the scale of their susceptibility to disease to explore the relationship between the degree of individual disease susceptibility and the level of internal group denigration. Experiment 2: the participants were divided into two groups using the minimal group paradigm, and then the two groups completed the task of preference selection of the target identity in different environments to explore the relationship between the external disease cues and the level of internal group degrade. Results: in experiment 1, the main effect of target identity was significant: F (1: 58) (4.44, p 0.05, 畏 _ (2) 0.07 (inner group: M = 3.82, SD1. 18; external group: 1. 17, SD1. 12). Results: the main effect of target identity was significant (F (1 / 58) P = 4.44, p = 0.05, 畏 _ 2 = 0.07). The main effect of identity was not significant (F _ (1 / 58) P _ (0.05), 畏 _ (2) 0.006). The interaction between the two was not significant. The total score of 畏 2=0.000.PVD scale was significantly correlated with the degree of debasement of the inner-group in the subjects. Factor 1 was a perception of disease infection, and it was significantly correlated with the degree of debasement of the inner-group in the subjects. Factor 2 was bacterial disgust, and factor 2 was bacterial disgust. It was significantly correlated with the degree of deprecation of the inner-group in the subjects. Experiment 2: the main effect of subjects' identity was not significant (F _ (1 / 76) ~ (2.81) p _ (0.05), 畏 _ (2) = 0.04). The main effect of disease cues is extremely significant: F _ (1 / 76) ~ (7.31) p _ (0.01), 畏 _ 2 ~ (0.09). The degree of inner-group debasement (M0. 79) was higher than that in control environment (M0. 79% SDT 0. 69) under the condition of disease environment (M0. 79% SDT 0. 69), and that in control environment was 0. 69% (M0. 79% SD0. 69). The interaction between the two was not significant (F _ (1 / 76) 1.23 (p 0.05) and 畏 _ (2) (0.02). Conclusion: 1, when the individual is more worried about the disease of his own infection, the phenomenon of internal group debasement is more obvious. 2. When the individual is in an environment prone to infection with the disease, The more obvious the phenomenon of inner-group debasement. 3, the inner-group denigration is related to the high level of disease threat brought by the inner group members. The formation of the disease threat plays a certain role in the formation of the deprecation of the group, and when there is the disease threat, the phenomenon of the internal group denigration is more obvious.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B848;R395
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 吳寶沛;張雷;;疾病的心理防御:人類如何應(yīng)對病菌威脅[J];心理科學進展;2011年03期
，本文編號：2204496
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2204496.html
最近更新
教材專著
