【摘要】：該研究旨在探索自我監(jiān)控與沖動(dòng)性的關(guān)系，解釋不同類型自我監(jiān)控者的行為機(jī)制。研究一以整群抽樣的方式，對(duì)350名地方院校大學(xué)生施測(cè)了《自我監(jiān)控量表》、《Barratt沖動(dòng)性量表中文修訂版》，初步探索了自我監(jiān)控與沖動(dòng)性的相關(guān)關(guān)系，分析討論了不同類型自我監(jiān)控者可能存在的沖動(dòng)性特征。隨后，以得分在子量表高分27%以上的個(gè)體作為典型被試，采用《自我監(jiān)控量表》篩選出三種類型自我監(jiān)控者（其中，他人導(dǎo)向組26人，，自我導(dǎo)向組26人，高自我監(jiān)控組24人），進(jìn)行沖動(dòng)性行為特征的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究。研究二中，以愛(ài)荷華賭博任務(wù)(IGT）來(lái)了解自我監(jiān)控者的沖動(dòng)性決策策略；研究三采用線索-反應(yīng)/抑制任務(wù)（Cued go/no-go task）測(cè)量自我監(jiān)控者的沖動(dòng)性行為反應(yīng)抑制能力。研究主要得到以下結(jié)論： （1）自我監(jiān)控與沖動(dòng)性的相關(guān)顯著。其中，他人導(dǎo)向與運(yùn)動(dòng)沖動(dòng)性、認(rèn)知沖動(dòng)性及無(wú)計(jì)劃沖動(dòng)性存在顯著正相關(guān)；自我導(dǎo)向與運(yùn)動(dòng)沖動(dòng)性存在顯著正相關(guān)，與認(rèn)知沖動(dòng)性及無(wú)計(jì)劃沖動(dòng)性表現(xiàn)出顯著負(fù)相關(guān)；高自我監(jiān)控與運(yùn)動(dòng)沖動(dòng)性、認(rèn)知沖動(dòng)性及無(wú)計(jì)劃沖動(dòng)性存在顯著負(fù)相關(guān)。 （2）他人導(dǎo)向者決策受損，存在 即時(shí)收益優(yōu)先‖效應(yīng)、高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)耐受性特征，出現(xiàn)決策績(jī)效低，決策策略改變不當(dāng)；自我導(dǎo)向者部分決策受損，存在 即時(shí)收益優(yōu)先‖效應(yīng)，決策績(jī)效較高，正性決策策略改變緩慢；而高自我監(jiān)控者不存在決策受損，決策績(jī)效高，正性決策策略改變迅速。 （3）作為協(xié)調(diào)自我與環(huán)境的人格傾向，自我監(jiān)控會(huì)影響個(gè)體的沖動(dòng)性行為表現(xiàn)。 （4）沖動(dòng)性決策是自我監(jiān)控者的行為機(jī)制之一。決策受損使得他人導(dǎo)向者存在認(rèn)知沖動(dòng)性、無(wú)計(jì)劃沖動(dòng)性。 （5）不同類型自我監(jiān)控者都能很好地抑制沖動(dòng)性反應(yīng)，但他人導(dǎo)向者、自我導(dǎo)向者需要更長(zhǎng)的加工時(shí)間以確保成功抑制行為。
[Abstract]:The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between self-monitoring and impulsiveness and to explain the behavioral mechanisms of different types of self-regulators. In the first study, the self-monitoring scale and the revised Chinese version of the Barratt impulsivity scale were tested on 350 local college students by cluster sampling, and the correlation between self-monitoring and impulsivity was preliminarily explored. The impulsive characteristics of different types of self-monitors are analyzed and discussed. Then, the individuals with a score of more than 27% in the sub-scale were used as the typical subjects, and three types of self-monitoring subjects were selected by using the self-monitoring scale (26 in the other-oriented group, 26 in the self-directed group, and 26 in the self-directed group). High self-monitoring group (n = 24) was used to study the characteristics of impulsive behavior. In the second study, the Iowa gambling task (IGT) was used to understand the impulsive decision strategy of the self-monitor, and the cue-response / inhibition task (Cued go/no-go task) was used to measure the inhibition of impulsive behavior. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the correlation between self-monitoring and impulsiveness is significant. Among them, there is a significant positive correlation between other orientation and motor impulse, cognitive impulse and unplanned impulse, self-orientation and motor impulse, and a significant negative correlation with cognitive impulse and unplanned impulse. There was significant negative correlation between high self-monitoring and motor impulsiveness, cognitive impulsiveness and unplanned impulsiveness. (2) decision making of others was impaired, there were immediate benefit priority effect and high risk tolerance. The decision performance is low, the decision strategy change is not appropriate, the self-guide part of the decision is damaged, there is the immediate benefit priority effect, the decision performance is higher, the positive decision strategy changes slowly, but the high self-monitoring person does not have the decision damage, but the high self-monitoring person does not have the decision damage. The decision-making performance is high and the positive decision strategy changes rapidly. (3) as a personality tendency to coordinate self and environment, (4) impulsive decision-making is one of the behavioral mechanisms of self-monitoring. Decision loss causes cognitive impulsiveness and unplanned impulsiveness in the other-oriented. (5) different types of self-monitoring can well inhibit impulsive responses, but others can, Self-guides need longer processing time to ensure successful inhibition of behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：閩南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B849

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖崇好;;自我監(jiān)控量表的探索性和驗(yàn)證性因素分析[J];韓山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

2 肖崇好;;自我監(jiān)控量表辨別效度的研究[J];韓山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

3 肖崇好;謝亞蘭;;自我監(jiān)控與心理健康的相關(guān)研究[J];衡陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

4 肖崇好;;自我監(jiān)控與社會(huì)行為的線索、控制和適宜性的相關(guān)研究[J];惠州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

5 洪幼娟;;大學(xué)生個(gè)體自尊、集體自尊與行為抑制的關(guān)系研究[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2010年04期

6 肖崇好;鄭輝;;自我監(jiān)控對(duì)失敗后自尊變化的調(diào)節(jié)作用[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2012年04期

7 肖崇好;黃希庭;;自我呈現(xiàn)個(gè)體差異的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

8 肖崇好;自我監(jiān)控概念的重構(gòu)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2005年02期

9 李飛;蘇林雁;耿耀國(guó);;Barratt沖動(dòng)量表用于兒童的信度和效度初步研究[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2006年02期

10 楊會(huì)芹;姚樹(shù)橋;朱熊兆;Randy P.Auerbach;John R.Z.Abela;;Barratt沖動(dòng)量表中文版用于中學(xué)生的信度、效度分析[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2007年01期

本文編號(hào)：2198258