【摘要】：在社會(huì)生活中,人們會(huì)將自己歸類于不同的群體,由于群體身份不同,他們會(huì)表現(xiàn)出不同的行為。其中,人們對(duì)群體產(chǎn)生的認(rèn)同融合和親群體行為越來越受到研究者們的關(guān)注。目前國(guó)內(nèi)有關(guān)認(rèn)同融合的研究稍顯不足,因此本研究在現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)與理論的基礎(chǔ)上,探索了個(gè)體的認(rèn)同融合程度與親群體行為以及合作行為之間的關(guān)系,并進(jìn)一步考察了責(zé)任感和無懈可擊感的中介作用模型。研究選取了山東省內(nèi)綜合性大學(xué)的在校大學(xué)生(N=378, M=20. 57, SD=1. 54)作為被試進(jìn)行調(diào)查,首先,使用圖片測(cè)量法和言語測(cè)量法兩種不同的方法測(cè)量被試的認(rèn)同程度。其次,研究根據(jù)真實(shí)生活情境對(duì)傳統(tǒng)電車難題進(jìn)行了改編,通過此范式研究被試的親群體行為,并采用公共物品范式(PGG)對(duì)對(duì)融合個(gè)體的群體合作行為傾向進(jìn)行了調(diào)查。最后,在研究個(gè)體認(rèn)同融合程度對(duì)其親群體以及合作行為影響的基礎(chǔ)上,本研究進(jìn)一步測(cè)量了個(gè)體的責(zé)任感和無懈可擊感,并驗(yàn)證了這兩者在該影響機(jī)制中的中介作用模型。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):1.個(gè)體的認(rèn)同融合程度能夠顯著預(yù)測(cè)他們的內(nèi)群體自我犧牲行為以及合作行為。與低認(rèn)同融合的個(gè)體相比,與自己所在群體高度融合的個(gè)體更愿意為群體及群體成員做出犧牲,他們也有更為明顯的合作行為傾向。1.當(dāng)認(rèn)同融合程度預(yù)測(cè)個(gè)體的自我犧牲行為時(shí),責(zé)任感和無懈可擊感在其中起中介作用。2.當(dāng)認(rèn)同融合預(yù)測(cè)個(gè)體合作行為傾向時(shí),責(zé)任感和無懈可擊感在其中也起到中介作用。研究結(jié)果證明了認(rèn)同融合理論以及社會(huì)認(rèn)同理論的觀點(diǎn),并對(duì)先前研究者們的研究進(jìn)行了驗(yàn)證:即認(rèn)同融合程度不同的個(gè)體在極端親群體行為中確實(shí)存在顯著差異,具體表現(xiàn)為與非融合個(gè)體相比,融合個(gè)體為自己所在內(nèi)群體做出犧牲的意愿更強(qiáng)烈。這種傾向在親群體行為和內(nèi)群體合作行為中都會(huì)明顯地表現(xiàn)出來。研究也進(jìn)一步探索了認(rèn)同融合對(duì)親群體行為的預(yù)測(cè)作用機(jī)制,對(duì)責(zé)任感和無懈可擊感的中介作用進(jìn)行了驗(yàn)證。
[Abstract]:In social life, people classify themselves in different groups and behave differently because of their different identities. Among them, people pay more and more attention to identity fusion and pro-group behavior. At present, the domestic research on identity fusion is a little insufficient. Therefore, based on the existing literature and theory, this study explores the relationship between the degree of identity fusion and the relationship between the degree of identity fusion and the behavior of relatives and groups as well as cooperative behavior. Furthermore, the intermediary model of sense of responsibility and impeccable sense is investigated. The study selected college students from comprehensive universities in Shandong province (NG378, MX20). 57, SD1. 54) as subjects, first, two different methods, picture measurement and speech measurement, were used to measure the degree of approval. Secondly, the paper adapts the traditional tram puzzles according to the real life situation, studies the pro-group behavior of the subjects through this paradigm, and uses the public goods paradigm (PGG) to investigate the collective cooperative behavior tendency of the integrated individuals. Finally, on the basis of studying the influence of the degree of individual identity fusion on their relatives and cooperative behavior, this study further measures the individual's sense of responsibility and impeccable, and verifies their mediating role model in the mechanism of influence. The study found that 1: 1. The degree of identity fusion can significantly predict their inner group self-sacrifice behavior and cooperative behavior. Compared with the individuals with low identity fusion, individuals who are highly integrated with their own group are more willing to make sacrifices for the group and group members, and they also have a more obvious cooperative behavior tendency. 1. When the degree of identity fusion predicts individual self-sacrifice behavior, responsibility and impeccable sense play an intermediary role. 2. When identification fusion predicts individual cooperative behavior tendency, responsibility and impeccable sense also play an intermediary role. The results prove that the theory of identity fusion and the view of social identity theory, and the previous researchers to verify that there are significant differences in extreme parental behavior between individuals with different degree of identity integration. Compared with non-fused individuals, fusion individuals are more willing to sacrifice for their own groups. This tendency is evident in both pro-group behavior and inter-group cooperative behavior. The research also explores the predictive mechanism of identity fusion on pro-group behavior and verifies the intermediary role of responsibility and impeccable feeling.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 崔麗娟;戚瑋;單銘明;;家庭認(rèn)同和認(rèn)同融合對(duì)極端家庭行為的影響及其中介變量的研究[J];心理研究;2013年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 單銘明;不同身份狀態(tài)的認(rèn)同融合與極端親群體行為[D];華東師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2166241