【摘要】：應聘者的偽裝行為是指應聘者為了能夠給人力專員留下良好的印象并獲得理想的評價分數(shù),進而對面試問題作出刻意歪曲的回答,因此是一種不誠實的使用印象管理策略的行為。 本研究使用了心理學的量化研究和質(zhì)化研究相結(jié)合的研究方法,主要包括編制應聘者面試偽裝量表,對面試偽裝行為的結(jié)構(gòu)與影響因素進行了探討。首先進行文獻查閱,在此基礎上進行了焦點小組討論、深度訪談以及開放式的問卷調(diào)查,接著收集面試行為的原始題目,編制原始問卷量表,對這個量表進行預試和項目分析后進行修訂,進而完成應聘者面試偽裝行為正式量表。采用探索性因子分析的方法得到應聘者偽裝行為的結(jié)構(gòu)模型。 此外,本文還分析了應聘者的面試偽裝行為在人口統(tǒng)計學變量以及組織學變量方面的差異。最后本研究重點分析面試偽裝行為、馬基雅維利主義與自我監(jiān)控水平之間的關(guān)系,著重探討了應聘者的馬基雅維利主義所造成的對應聘者面試偽裝行為的影響；自我監(jiān)控水平對面試偽裝行為的影響程度。研究結(jié)論如下： (1)應聘者的面試偽裝行為包括四個因子：匹配度優(yōu)化；光輝形象塑造；過往事跡修改和人際恭維。 (2)“應聘者偽裝行為調(diào)查量表”的信效度計算結(jié)果表明,該量表具有比較好的同質(zhì)性信度與分半信度,結(jié)構(gòu)效度和內(nèi)容效度也符合心理測量學的標準。 (3)比較了應聘者的面試偽裝行為各維度之間在各人口統(tǒng)計學變量上的差異,發(fā)現(xiàn)應聘者的面試偽裝行為在性別、教育程度、年齡、專業(yè)類別、面試次數(shù)這五個人口統(tǒng)計學變量上存在著顯著性差異。 (4)采取多元回歸的統(tǒng)計方法處理得到的數(shù)據(jù),結(jié)果顯示不僅應聘者的馬基雅維利主義水平對面試偽裝行為有很強的預測作用,自我監(jiān)控水平對面試偽裝行為也有很強的預測作用。應聘者的自我監(jiān)控水平在馬基雅維利主義和面試偽裝行為之間起中介作用。
[Abstract]:In order to make a good impression on the HR Commissioner and get an ideal evaluation score, the candidate's behavior of camouflage means that the candidate deliberately distorts the answer to the interview question. Therefore, it is a dishonest use of impression management strategy behavior. This study uses the quantitative and qualitative research methods of psychology, mainly including the preparation of interview camouflage scale, to explore the structure and influencing factors of interview camouflage behavior. On the basis of literature review, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and open questionnaires were conducted, and then the original topics of interview behavior were collected, and the original questionnaire scale was compiled. The scale was revised after pre-test and item analysis to complete the formal questionnaire of interview behavior. The exploratory factor analysis was used to obtain the structural model of the candidate's camouflage behavior. In addition, the differences in demographics and histology of interview camouflage were analyzed. Finally, this study focuses on the analysis of interview camouflage behavior, the relationship between Machiavellianism and self-monitoring level, focusing on the impact of Machiavellianism on interview camouflage behavior. The influence of self-monitoring level on interview camouflage behavior. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the behavior of interview camouflage includes four factors: the optimization of matching degree, the shaping of brilliant image; (2) the reliability and validity of the questionnaire showed that the scale had good homogeneity reliability and split-half reliability. The structure validity and content validity also accord with the standard of psychometrics. (3) the differences in demographics among different dimensions of interview camouflage behavior were compared. There were significant differences among the five demographic variables: education level, age, major category and interview frequency. (4) the data were processed by multivariate regression. The results showed that not only did the applicant's Machiavellian level predict the interview camouflage behavior, but also the self-monitoring level had a strong predictive effect on the interview camouflage behavior. The level of self-monitoring plays an intermediary role between Machiavellianism and interview pretence.
【學位授予單位】：北京林業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B848

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 葛魯嘉;;心理學研究中定性研究與定量研究的定位問題[J];西北師大學報(社會科學版);2007年06期

2 李峰,張德,張宇蓮;心理控制源與自我監(jiān)控在預測中的交互作用[J];心理學報;1992年03期

3 溫忠麟,侯杰泰,張雷;調(diào)節(jié)效應與中介效應的比較和應用[J];心理學報;2005年02期

4 李鋒,李永娟,任婧,王二平;工業(yè)組織心理學中的社會稱許性研究[J];心理科學進展;2004年03期

5 肖崇好;自我監(jiān)控概念的重構(gòu)[J];心理科學進展;2005年02期

6 劉娟娟;;印象管理及其相關(guān)研究述評[J];心理科學進展;2006年02期

7 陳向明;社會科學中的定性研究方法[J];中國社會科學;1996年06期

，

本文編號：2162072