發(fā)布時間：2018-07-21 16:36

【摘要】：目的描述安徽省青少年謀害他人心理行為的流行特征,探討青少年生長發(fā)育歷程中童年期不良經(jīng)歷對青少年謀害他人心理行為的影響。方法分別從安徽省皖南、皖北、皖中每個片區(qū)選取1所普通初級中學和1所普通高級中學,每所學校每個年級各調(diào)查約320人(男女各半),共對5 726名初一~高三學生,使用自編“安徽省青少年健康情況調(diào)查問卷”,采用橫斷面調(diào)查方式,調(diào)查青少年在最近6個月的謀害心理行為發(fā)生情況,同時調(diào)查青少年一般情況與童年期不良經(jīng)歷發(fā)生情況等。結(jié)果5 726名中學生最近6個月有過謀害意念、謀害計劃、謀害準備、謀害未遂4種謀害他人心理行為的報告率分別為9.9%,2.8%,1.3%,0.6%。不同性別、不同年級、不同朋友數(shù)量、不同自評相貌的青少年學生4種謀害心理行為報告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P值均0.001);與父母關(guān)系較差的學生更容易產(chǎn)生謀害意念和謀害計劃,自評學習成績較差的學生更容易產(chǎn)生謀害意念、謀害計劃和謀害準備,差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P值均0.001)。童年期各種不良經(jīng)歷在男女生間差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P值均0.001)。童年期不同被欺凌經(jīng)歷(言語欺凌、關(guān)系欺凌、軀體欺凌)的青少年4種謀害他人心理行為(謀害意念、謀害計劃、謀害準備、謀害未遂)報告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P值均0.001)。各種類型的童年期被欺凌經(jīng)歷(言語欺凌、關(guān)系欺凌、軀體欺凌)均為青少年4種謀害他人心理行為的危險因素(P值均0.05)。童年期不同虐待與忽視經(jīng)歷(軀體虐待、情感虐待、性虐待、情感忽視、軀體忽視)的青少年4種謀害他人心理行為的報告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P值均0.001)。各種類型童年期虐待與忽視經(jīng)歷(軀體虐待、情感虐待、性虐待、情感忽視、軀體忽視)均為青少年4種謀害他人心理行為的危險因素(P值均0.05)。童年期不同親子分離情況的青少年謀害未遂報告率差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),童年期與母親分離為青少年謀害未遂的危險因素(P0.05)。童年期遭遇不同家庭不良生活事件的青少年4種謀害他人心理行為報告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P值均0.05),童年期遭遇不同學校不良生活事件的青少年謀害意念、謀害計劃、謀害準備報告率差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P值均0.05)。童年期遭遇來自家庭1~2種及3種以上不良生活事件是青少年謀害意念的危險因素,童年期家庭不良生活事件發(fā)生3種以上是青少年謀害未遂的危險因素,童年期學校不良生活事件發(fā)生4種及以上為謀害意念、謀害計劃和謀害準備的危險因素(P值均0.05)。分別將青少年謀害意念、謀害計劃、謀害準備和謀害未遂作為結(jié)局變量(因變量),將童年期虐待與忽視、童年期被欺凌情況、童年期親子分離、童年期不良生活事件同時作為自變量,并將影響青少年謀害心理行為的人口學特征變量作為控制變量進行多因素回歸分析,結(jié)果顯示童年期情感虐待、性虐待、被同伴欺凌經(jīng)歷(軀體、言語、關(guān)系)、經(jīng)歷過4種及以上學校不良生活事件均為青少年謀害意念的危險因素(P值均0.05);童年期性虐待、情感忽視、被同伴軀體欺凌均為青少年謀害計劃的危險因素(P值均0.05);童年期被軀體欺凌為青少年謀害準備的危險因素(P值0.05);童年期性虐待與軀體忽視均為青少年謀害未遂的危險因素(P值均0.05)。結(jié)論青少年謀害他人心理行為現(xiàn)象較為嚴重,應(yīng)引起人們普遍關(guān)注。青少年謀害他人心理行為在不同人口特征上存在一定差異,童年期被欺凌經(jīng)歷、童年期虐待與忽視經(jīng)歷、童年期親子分離經(jīng)歷及童年期來自家庭及學校不良生活事件都是造成青少年時期謀害他人心理行為的重要危險因素,應(yīng)有針對性采取相應(yīng)干預(yù)措施。
[Abstract]:Objective to describe the epidemiological characteristics of the psychological behavior of young people in Anhui Province, and to explore the effects of childhood bad experiences on the psychological behavior of young people during their growth and development. Methods 1 ordinary primary schools and 1 ordinary high schools were selected from each area of Southern Anhui, Northern Anhui and Anhui Province, each school was selected. About 320 students (half and half of men and women) in each grade and 5726 junior high school students were used to investigate the psychological behavior of teenagers in the last 6 months by using a cross-sectional survey to investigate the occurrence of psychological behavior of adolescents in the last 6 months. At the same time, the general situation of teenagers and the occurrence of bad experiences in childhood were investigated. Results in the last 6 months, 5726 middle school students have had an idea of ploy, plan for murder, prepare for harm, and 4 kinds of reports of attempted harm to others' psychological behavior, respectively, 9.9%, 2.8%, 1.3%, 0.6%., different sexes, different grades, different numbers of friends, and the difference of psychological behavior reporting rates among 4 young students with different looks. Learning significance (P value was 0.001); students with poor relationship with parents were more likely to produce harm intention and plan for harm. Students with poor academic performance were more likely to produce harm ideas, plan and prepare for harm. The difference was statistically significant (P value was 0.001). All kinds of bad experiences in childhood were statistically significant between men and women. The significance (P value was 0.001). 4 adolescents who were bullying and bullying in childhood (verbal bullying, bullying and physical bullying) had statistically significant differences in reporting rates (P values of 0.001). Bullying and physical bullying were 4 risk factors for adolescents' psychological behavior (P value was 0.05). There were 4 different reporting rates (P values, 0.001) of juvenile abuse and neglect in childhood (physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, physical neglect). All kinds of differences were statistically significant (0.001). Childhood abuse and neglect (physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, physical neglect) were 4 risk factors for adolescents' psychological behavior (P values were all 0.05). The difference in reported rate of attempted juvenile murder with different parental separation in childhood was statistically significant (P0.05), and childhood and mother were separated as green. The risk factors of attempted juvenile Ploy (P0.05). 4 young people who suffered from different family life events in childhood were statistically significant (P, 0.05), and the adolescents who suffered from different school life events in their childhood had their intention to plot harm, plan for harm, and the difference of preparation reporting rates were all of the difference. Statistical significance (P value is 0.05). Childhood experience from family 1~2 species and more than 3 kinds of bad life events are risk factors for teenagers to plot their ideas, and 3 kinds of bad life events in childhood are the risk factors for young people to commit suicide, and 4 kinds of unhealthy life events in childhood school are the idea of ploy to plot harm. The risk factors of planning and preparing for harm (P value are all 0.05). The young people are trying to plot their ideas, make plans for harm, prepare for harm and attempt to commit suicide as outcome variables (due to variables), the childhood abuse and neglect, childhood bullying, childhood parent-child separation, childhood ungood life events simultaneously as independent variables, and will affect young people to make harm. The demographic variable of psychological behavior was used as a control variable to carry out multiple factors regression analysis. The results showed that childhood emotional abuse, sexual abuse, peer bullying experience (body, speech, relationship), and 4 or more bad life events in school were all risk factors for teenagers to plot their ideas (P value is 0.05); childhood sexual abuse, emotion Neglecting and being bullied by the body were all the risk factors (P value of 0.05) for young people, and the risk factors (P value 0.05) of physical bullying in childhood, and sexual abuse and physical neglect in childhood (P 0.05). There is a serious concern. There are certain differences in the psychological behavior of young people in different demographic characteristics, childhood bullying experience, childhood abuse and neglect experience, childhood parent-child separation experience and childhood from family and school bad life events are the psychological behavior of young people. Important risk factors should be targeted to take corresponding intervention measures.
【學位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B844.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姚偉;兒童是自然的存在[J];學前教育研究;2005年Z1期

2 葉青;陶芳標;方東升;黃錕;孫瑩;;童年期虐待與青少年不良飲食心理行為的研究[J];中華流行病學雜志;2006年04期

3 陳小燕;;她為何徘徊?——不可忽視的童年期影響[J];大眾心理學;2005年07期

4 林琳琳;;童年期遺忘及其消退機制研究概述[J];中國電力教育;2009年03期

5 安芹;賈曉明;李波;;中學生童年期創(chuàng)傷經(jīng)驗與自尊、主觀幸福感的關(guān)系[J];中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2009年08期

6 姚桂英;杜愛玲;楊世昌;高紅麗;馬仁娥;閆春平;;人格在大學生童年期精神虐待與當前抑郁癥狀之間的中介作用[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2011年01期

7 倪巖娟;趙冰潔;;大學生成人依戀與童年期經(jīng)歷的關(guān)系研究[J];重慶三峽學院學報;2012年02期

8 林琳琳;秦金亮;;童年期遺忘消退機制的幾種解釋[J];幼兒教育;2009年12期

9 年晶;;進化觀下的童年期延長與現(xiàn)實困境[J];少年兒童研究;2009年18期

10 劉敬華;童年期教育淺談[J];黑河教育;2004年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前5條

1 林琳琳;袁中興;;童年期遺忘產(chǎn)生及消退機制的研究綜述[A];第十一屆全國心理學學術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2007年

2 位照國;陸邵佳;吳韋瑋;廖梅;李衛(wèi)暉;李則宣;劉鐵榜;李凌江;;童年期創(chuàng)傷影響成年抑郁表達的中間機制[A];中華醫(yī)學會第十次全國精神醫(yī)學學術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2012年

3 李先賓;劉金同;王傳躍;;青少年虐待狀況及其對人格的影響[A];中華醫(yī)學會第十次全國精神醫(yī)學學術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2012年

4 陳晶琦;廖巍;;北京市430名高中生童年期羞辱經(jīng)歷及其與心理健康的關(guān)聯(lián)[A];中華預(yù)防醫(yī)學會兒少衛(wèi)生分會第九屆學術(shù)交流會、中國教育學會體育與衛(wèi)生分會第一屆學校衛(wèi)生學術(shù)交流會、中國健康促進與教育協(xié)會學校分會第三屆學術(shù)交流會論文集[C];2011年

5 張文新;周宗奎;;童年期至青少年期的同伴侵害與欺負:適應(yīng)結(jié)果與相關(guān)因素[A];增強心理學服務(wù)社會的意識和功能——中國心理學會成立90周年紀念大會暨第十四屆全國心理學學術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 雍年 李永和 張燕華;呵護孩子的童年期[N];保定日報;2005年

2 本報記者 謝苗楓 程滿清 胡鍵 徐林 通訊員 焦亞瓊;暴力與愛等同導(dǎo)致過半孩子挨打[N];南方日報;2006年

3 樊發(fā)稼 作者系中國社科院文學所研究員;兒童文學生態(tài)及其他[N];文藝報;2005年

4 楊桂青;網(wǎng)絡(luò)成癮機制的五個理論支撐[N];中國教育報;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 刁鵬飛;童年期創(chuàng)傷與心理防御機制的關(guān)系及繪畫療法干預(yù)研究[D];云南師范大學;2015年

2 元帥;童年期被忽視個體注意偏向的ERP研究[D];新鄉(xiāng)醫(yī)學院;2015年

3 胡國云;《童年期慢性應(yīng)激評定量表》的編制及其信效度評價[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學;2016年

4 閆景蕾;童年創(chuàng)傷對大學生戀愛滿意度的影響：自尊與感知伴侶應(yīng)答的序列中介作用[D];武漢體育學院;2017年

5 葉青;童年期虐待經(jīng)歷與青少年不良飲食心理行為的研究[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學;2006年

6 倪巖娟;大學生成人依戀與童年期創(chuàng)傷經(jīng)歷的關(guān)系研究和個案干預(yù)[D];漳州師范學院;2012年

7 孫蓓;童年期遺忘的邊界年齡的探討[D];浙江師范大學;2012年

8 肖亞男;童年期虐待經(jīng)歷與青少年自我傷害行為的研究[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學;2009年

9 左俊楠;哲學人類學視野下童年期意義研究[D];東北師范大學;2011年

10 何冬梅;童年期心理虐待對大學生自尊和自卑的影響[D];哈爾濱師范大學;2015年

，

本文編號：2136132