本文選題：巴瑞特沖動性量表 + 薈萃分析�。� 參考：《皖南醫(yī)學院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:1.系統(tǒng)評價巴瑞特沖動性量表(BIS-11)信效度,探討不同地域文化背景下信效度的差異,尋找影響B(tài)IS-11信效度的預測來源。2.在不同中國青少年樣本中檢驗BIS-11中文版的信效度,檢驗量表跨文化的適應性及跨人群的差異性。方法:1.計算機檢索Pubmed、Science Direct、wiley-Blackwell、萬方、中國知網(wǎng)、維普中文科技期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫及百度學術檢索國內外BIS-11信效度相關文獻,檢索時限為1995-2016年1月1日,按納入與排除標準篩選文獻并提取資料。對Cronbach’s a采用Rodriguez、Maeda使用的a系數(shù)效應量轉換方法,重測信度利用Fisher’s Z轉換,然后利用R語言的metacor package對信度系數(shù)效應量進行meta分析,分析不同地域的信度差異;利用SPSS 18.0對信度系數(shù)進行加權回歸分析,以找出信度系數(shù)的預測來源。采用資料分析總結概括BIS-11的因子結構分析。2.在正常青少年、心理障礙青少年、違法青少年及網(wǎng)絡成癮青少年這四組青少年樣本中進行BIS-11中文版的信效度再驗證。采用SPSS 18.0在不同青少年樣本及總樣本中分析BIS-11量表總分及分量表的內部一致性信度、分半信度,計算正常、異常青少年的重測信度,不同樣本量表總分及各分量表得分差異,在不同青少年樣本及總樣本中驗證一階三因子模型、一階六因子模型、二階三因子模型、二階二因子模型及兩個雙因子模型的效度。結果:1.薈萃分析共納入35個研究(包含45個樣本),Cronbach’s a、pearson’s r、ICC三類信度系數(shù)效應量的漏斗圖結果支持Cronbach’s a繼續(xù)meta分析。Meta分析結果顯示所有樣本的Cronbach’s a系數(shù)為0.81,95%CI(0.79,0.83);歐美地區(qū)為0.79,95%CI(0.77,0.82);亞洲地區(qū)為0.84,95%CI(0.81,0.86);其他地區(qū)為0.77,95%CI(0.74,0.80)。異質性檢驗:所有研究值為74.8%(P0.001);亞組分析,歐美、亞洲、其他地區(qū)的I2值依次為71.2%(P0.001),68.2%(P0.001),41.5%(P=0.14)。Meta回歸分析顯示樣本量、年齡、人群、測驗版本、地域與a系數(shù)效應量多元回歸相關系數(shù)R=0.56,5個變量共解釋a系數(shù)效應量30.9%,測驗版本和人群兩變量回歸系數(shù)達到顯著[-0.34(P0.05)、-0.61(P0.001)]。即人群、修訂版本對a系數(shù)存在顯著的正向影響。因子結構分析的結果顯示BIS-11所測的沖動性維度不適應單維模型,多數(shù)研究支持Barratt原始三因素模型,驗證性因素分析結果顯示對嵌套Patton六因子模型的高階因子模型也有較好的模型擬合結果。2.在總樣本及四組青少年樣本中,三個分量表及總量表有著較好的內部一致性信度,除正常青少年及總樣本的認知分量表內部一致性信度低于0.80(分別為0.67、0.79),其他均在0.80以上�？倶颖綛IS-11的分半信度為0.88,重測信度正常青少年、網(wǎng)絡成癮青少年分別為0.79、0.72。四組青少年樣本的總量表及各分量表得分差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.001)。結構效度分析顯示Barratt的三因素模型[總樣本:RMSEA=0.047,95%CI(0.044,0.050),AGFI=0.91]、Patton的六因素模型擬合較佳[總樣本:RMSEA=0.055,95%CI(0.052,0.058),AGFI=0.91],雙因子模型也有不錯的擬合效果[總樣本G-3模型:RMSEA=0.041,95%CI(0.039,0.044),CFI=0.91;總樣本G-6模型:RMSEA=0.055,95%CI(0.052,0.058);CFI=0.85],高階因子模型擬合不佳。結論:1.BIS-11在不同地域文化使用均有良好的信度,該量表具有較好的跨文化適應性。人群、測驗版本對a系數(shù)起正向預測作用,臨床人群內施測得出內部一致性高于非臨床人群,BIS-11修訂版本較其他版本信度要高。BIS-11中文修訂版在正常、異常青少年中再驗證分析時顯示了較好的心理測量學特性。2.三因素結構顯示較好的穩(wěn)定性,在中國青少年樣本中三因子結構模型也有較好的效度,在解釋BIS-11分數(shù)時可首選三因素理論模型,雙因子模型可作為多維結構的新視角對沖動性維度進行解釋。
[Abstract]:Objective: 1. to evaluate the reliability and validity of Barrett Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11), to explore the difference in the reliability and validity of different regional cultural backgrounds, and to search for the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the prediction source.2. in different Chinese adolescent samples, the adaptability of the test scale and the difference of cross population in different Chinese adolescents. Methods: 1. methods: The computer retrieves Pubmed, Science Direct, wiley-Blackwell, Wanfang, China knowledge network, VP Chinese sci-tech journal full text database and Baidu academic retrieval of BIS-11 reliability and validity related literature at home and abroad. The retrieval time limit is 1995-2016 years in January 1st, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, select the literature and extract the data. Cronbach 's a is used Rodriguez, Maeda use. The method of a coefficient effect conversion, retest reliability using Fisher 's Z conversion, and then using METACOR package in R language to analyze the reliability coefficient effect by meta analysis, analyze the difference of reliability in different regions, and use SPSS 18 to carry out weighted regression analysis on reliability coefficient to find out the source of reliability coefficient prediction. The factor structure analysis of BIS-11.2. was used to reverify the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of BIS-11 in four groups of adolescents, mental disorders, juvenile delinquents and Internet addicts. SPSS 18 was used to analyze the internal consistency letter of the total scores and subscales of the BIS-11 scale in different adolescents and total samples. Degree, split half reliability, normal calculation, abnormal teenager retest reliability, difference of total score of different sample scale and the score of each subscale, test the first order three factor model, first order six factor model, two order three factor model, Nikai Ni factor model and two double factor model. The result: 1. meta score. A total of 35 studies (including 45 samples), Cronbach 's a, Pearson' s R, and ICC three reliability coefficient effects are supported by Cronbach 's a continued meta analysis of.Meta analysis results. CI (0.81,0.86); other areas for 0.77,95%CI (0.74,0.80). Heterogeneity test: all research values were 74.8% (P0.001); subgroup analysis, Europe, America, Asia, and other regions, I2 values in turn were 71.2% (P0.001), 68.2% (P0.001), 41.5% (P=0.14).Meta regression analysis showed the sample size, age, population, test version, region and a coefficient effect multivariate regression correlation The coefficient of coefficient R=0.56,5 was 30.9%, the coefficient of a coefficient effect was 30.9%, the regression coefficient of test version and population two variable reached significant [-0.34 (P0.05), -0.61 (P0.001)]. That is, the revised version had a significant positive effect on the a coefficient. The result of factor structure analysis showed that the impulse dimension measured by BIS-11 was not suitable for the single dimension model, most of the research branch was used. With the Barratt three factor model, the results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the high order factor model of the nested Patton six factor model also had better model fitting results..2. had good internal consistency reliability in the total sample and four groups of youth samples, and there was a better internal consistency reliability in the three subscales and the total scale, except for the cognitive scores of the normal adolescents and the total samples. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was less than 0.80 (0.67,0.79), and the others were above 0.80. The split half reliability of the total sample BIS-11 was 0.88, the retest reliability was normal young people. The total table and the difference of the scores of the 0.79,0.72. four adolescents were statistically significant (P0.001). The structural validity analysis showed B The three factor model of arratt [total sample: RMSEA=0.047,95%CI (0.044,0.050), AGFI=0.91], Patton's six factor model is better fitting [total sample: RMSEA=0.055,95%CI (0.052,0.058), AGFI=0.91], and double factor model also has good fitting effect [total sample G-3 model: RMSEA =0.041,95%CI (0.039,0.044)). 95%CI (0.052,0.058); CFI=0.85], the high order factor model is not fit. Conclusion: 1.BIS-11 has good reliability in different regional cultural use. The scale has better cross-cultural adaptability. Population, test version has a positive predictive effect on a coefficient, and the internal consistency of the clinical population is higher than that of non clinical population, BIS-11 revision. Compared with other versions, the Chinese revised version is.BIS-11 in normal, and the analysis of abnormal adolescents shows better psychometric characteristics when the.2. three factor structure shows good stability. The three factor structural model in Chinese teenagers also has better validity, and the three factor theory can be preferred when interpreting BIS-11 scores. The two factor model can be used as a new perspective of multidimensional structure to explain the impulsivity dimension.
【學位授予單位】：皖南醫(yī)學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B841.7

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 萬燕;程灶火;張Z諶，

本文編號：2117481