本文選題：社會(huì)交換 + 面子　； 參考：《江西師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：“給某人個(gè)面子”、“看在某某人的面子上”等是人們的日常用語(yǔ)。面子可以借、可以給、可以還，這說(shuō)明面子就如同某種物件可以相互交換。本研究從社會(huì)交換論的角度提出了面子交換的概念，并對(duì)這一日�，F(xiàn)象進(jìn)行一定的理論分析和實(shí)證研究。所謂面子交換指的是社會(huì)互動(dòng)的一方表現(xiàn)出某種行為以向另一方聲討面子，當(dāng)另一方做出給或不給面子的表示之后，這一方做出的與面子有關(guān)或無(wú)關(guān)的回報(bào)行為。本研究共包括三個(gè)部分：面子交換問(wèn)卷編制及現(xiàn)狀分析、面子交換資源和面子交換功能分析。 面子交換問(wèn)卷編制及現(xiàn)狀分析。本研究認(rèn)為面子交換的形態(tài)主要包括三種：抬面子、護(hù)面子和損面子。抬面子指互動(dòng)一方增加另一方面子的行為；護(hù)面子指?jìng)�(gè)體維護(hù)他人面子使之不至于丟失的行為；損面子是指?jìng)�(gè)體造成他人面子減少的行為。本研究在此理論基礎(chǔ)上，并結(jié)合深入訪談和專家意見編制了包含25個(gè)題項(xiàng)的面子交換問(wèn)卷并施測(cè)于大學(xué)生群體；經(jīng)檢驗(yàn)，總問(wèn)卷的內(nèi)部一致性信度為0.804，各維度的一致性信度均在0.6以上，達(dá)到了測(cè)量學(xué)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；通過(guò)驗(yàn)證性因素分析對(duì)問(wèn)卷的結(jié)構(gòu)效度進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn)，各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)符合測(cè)量學(xué)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，驗(yàn)證了面子交換問(wèn)卷包含六個(gè)維度：抬面子、護(hù)面子、損面子、抬面子回報(bào)、護(hù)面子回報(bào)和損面子回報(bào)，共能解釋總變異的53.066%。最后使用面子交換問(wèn)卷對(duì)大學(xué)生面子交換的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了調(diào)查，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)，男女生在抬面子回報(bào)維度上、獨(dú)生子女與非獨(dú)生子女在抬面子維度和問(wèn)卷總分上、來(lái)自與城市和農(nóng)村的學(xué)生在損面子回報(bào)和抬面子回報(bào)和損面子維度上存在顯著差異。 面子交換資源的分析。本研究對(duì)19名在校大學(xué)生和4名研究生的深入訪談資料進(jìn)行整理和編碼，獲得關(guān)于面子交換資源的120個(gè)開放式編碼和7個(gè)關(guān)聯(lián)式編碼。7個(gè)關(guān)聯(lián)式編碼分別為：夸獎(jiǎng)、幫助、提升自身、情感與關(guān)系、順從、地位和物質(zhì)。本研究將面子交換資源和社會(huì)交換資源進(jìn)行比較，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)兩者具有一定相似性，但“提升自身”這一類別沒有包含在社會(huì)交換資源的分類中，本研究對(duì)此結(jié)果進(jìn)行了分析和討論。 面子交換的功能分析。本研究對(duì)23名在校大學(xué)生、研究生和5位社會(huì)人士的深入訪談資料進(jìn)行整理和編碼，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)，面子交換的積極功能主要包括：給面子的人有面子，提升人際關(guān)系質(zhì)量，改善情緒，提高自尊和自信，提升能力，提升影響力，獲取資源的手段，激勵(lì)，社會(huì)功能，共9個(gè)方面，涉及到個(gè)體和社會(huì)兩個(gè)層面；面子交換的消極功能包括：感受到壓力，對(duì)給面子和維護(hù)面子的人和周圍的人造成不良影響，自負(fù)、驕傲、自滿，覺得虛偽和人情淡漠，不能發(fā)現(xiàn)自身的問(wèn)題或發(fā)現(xiàn)其他問(wèn)題，社會(huì)影響，共6個(gè)方面，也涉及個(gè)體和社會(huì)兩個(gè)層面。
[Abstract]:"give someone face", "look at someone's face", etc is a common language. Face can be borrowed, can be given, can be returned, which shows that face is like something that can be exchanged. This study puts forward the concept of face exchange from the perspective of social exchange theory, and makes a theoretical analysis and empirical research on this daily phenomenon. The so-called "face exchange" refers to the behavior of one side of social interaction to denounce face from the other party, and when the other party gives or does not give face, the other party makes a return behavior related to or unrelated to face. This study consists of three parts: the compilation and analysis of face exchange questionnaire, the analysis of face exchange resources and the function of face exchange. Preparation and current situation analysis of face exchange questionnaire. This study considers that face exchange includes three types: face lifting, saving face and losing face. To raise face refers to the behavior of increasing the other's face by one side of the interaction; the act of protecting face to protect the face of others so as not to lose it; and the act of losing face refers to the act of reducing the face of others by an individual. On the basis of this theory, combined with in-depth interviews and expert opinions, this study compiled a face exchange questionnaire containing 25 items and applied it to college students. The internal consistency reliability of the total questionnaire was 0.804, and the consistency reliability of each dimension was above 0.6, which reached the standard of measurement, and the structural validity of the questionnaire was tested by confirmatory factor analysis. The results show that the questionnaire includes six dimensions: lifting face, saving face, losing face, promoting face return, saving face return and losing face return, which can explain the total variation of 53.06667. Finally, the characteristics of face exchange among college students are investigated by using the face exchange questionnaire. The results show that the male and female students in the dimension of face raising and return, the only child and the non-only child in the dimension of lifting face and the total score of the questionnaire. There are significant differences between the students from urban and rural areas in the dimensions of face loss, face gain and face loss. Analysis of face exchange resources. In this study, the data of 19 college students and 4 graduate students were sorted out and coded, and 120 open codes and 7 correlation codes were obtained about face exchange resources. The seven correlation codes were: praise, help, etc. Elevate oneself, emotion and relationship, obedience, status and substance. This study compares the face exchange resources with the social exchange resources. The results show that the two resources are similar to each other, but the category of "upgrading oneself" is not included in the classification of social exchange resources. The results are analyzed and discussed. The function analysis of face exchange. In this study, 23 college students, graduate students and 5 social personages were analyzed and coded. The results show that the positive functions of face exchange mainly include: giving face to face, improving the quality of interpersonal relationship. Improving mood, improving self-esteem and self-confidence, enhancing ability, enhancing influence, means of obtaining resources, motivation, social function, involving two aspects of individual and society, the negative function of face exchange includes: feeling pressure, It has a negative impact on those who give face and maintain face, and the people around them. They feel conceited, proud, complacent, feeling hypocritical and indifferent, unable to discover their own problems or other problems, and social influence, in all six aspects. It also involves both individual and social aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B849

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 孫慶民;;認(rèn)知傾向的社會(huì)交換理論[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年02期

2 孫慶民;社會(huì)交換資源理論評(píng)述[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1994年06期

3 孫慶民;行為主義與社會(huì)交換[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1995年03期

4 姜彩芬;;面子文化產(chǎn)生根源及社會(huì)功能[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年03期

5 施卓敏;范麗潔;葉錦鋒;;中國(guó)人的臉面觀及其對(duì)消費(fèi)者解讀奢侈品廣告的影響研究[J];南開管理評(píng)論;2012年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2037687