本文選題：高中生 + 成就目標(biāo)定向��； 參考：《浙江師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：自我調(diào)節(jié)學(xué)習(xí)與元認(rèn)知的關(guān)系十分密切,而學(xué)習(xí)時間分配作為元認(rèn)知控制的核心成分之一,也會對學(xué)習(xí)效果產(chǎn)生影響,尤其是在素質(zhì)教育倡導(dǎo)的“自主學(xué)習(xí)”理念的影響下,教育工作者們更加關(guān)注學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)動機和學(xué)習(xí)過程。 有關(guān)學(xué)習(xí)時間分配的研究已有近40年歷史,它的指標(biāo)主要包括項目選擇和自定步調(diào)學(xué)習(xí)時間兩個方面。隨著研究的深入,關(guān)于學(xué)習(xí)時間分配的內(nèi)在機制尚存有爭議,從差異減小模型、層次模型、最近學(xué)習(xí)區(qū)模型到最新近的基于議程調(diào)節(jié)模型,研究者不斷豐富內(nèi)容并在以往研究的基礎(chǔ)上加以修訂和完善,他們開始探討除了難度之外的其它因素對學(xué)習(xí)時間分配的影響。作為學(xué)習(xí)動機領(lǐng)域的研究熱點,成就目標(biāo)定向受到越來越多研究者的關(guān)注,但由于研究對象、實驗范式等條件不一致,有關(guān)成就目標(biāo)定向?qū)W(xué)習(xí)時間分配的研究仍在進(jìn)一步發(fā)展和完善。本研究欲探討在難度和分值結(jié)合的兩因素復(fù)雜情境中,特質(zhì)性成就目標(biāo)定向及其與情境性成就目標(biāo)定向?qū)Ω咧猩鷮W(xué)習(xí)時間分配的影響,以期豐富學(xué)習(xí)時間分配的影響因素研究,為基于議程調(diào)節(jié)模型提供實證依據(jù),促進(jìn)高中學(xué)生自主學(xué)習(xí)能力的發(fā)展和課堂教學(xué)改革質(zhì)量的提高。 研究采用Metcalfe (2002)實驗范式,由兩個實驗組成,均設(shè)置無時間限制的難度與分值結(jié)合的復(fù)雜情境。實驗1考察在復(fù)雜情境中,特質(zhì)性成就目標(biāo)定向?qū)Ω咧猩鷮W(xué)習(xí)時間分配的影響,以70名高中生為被試,采用三因素混合實驗設(shè)計；實驗2增加了情境性成就目標(biāo)定向的操作和檢驗程序,共同考察特質(zhì)性和情境性成就目標(biāo)定向?qū)Ω咧猩鷮W(xué)習(xí)時間分配的影響,以138名高中生為被試,采用四因素混合實驗設(shè)計。本研究主要得出以下結(jié)論： 第一,在僅有特質(zhì)性成就目標(biāo)定向的復(fù)雜情境中,所有被試都傾向于優(yōu)先選擇容易項目進(jìn)行學(xué)習(xí),但在困難項目上分配了更多的學(xué)習(xí)時間,而成績目標(biāo)定向?qū)W習(xí)者優(yōu)先選擇并分配更多的學(xué)習(xí)時間給高分項目； 第二,在特質(zhì)性和情境性成就目標(biāo)定向的雙重影響下,所有學(xué)習(xí)者優(yōu)先選擇容易項目和高分項目,但在困難項目和高分項目上分配的學(xué)習(xí)時間更多,且不同情境性成就目標(biāo)定向?qū)W習(xí)者在不同難度和分值項目上的項目選擇和時間分配表現(xiàn)出顯著差異,即情境性掌握目標(biāo)學(xué)習(xí)者傾向于優(yōu)先選擇低分項目,且在低分和困難項目上分配了更多學(xué)習(xí)時間,而情境性成績目標(biāo)學(xué)習(xí)者傾向于優(yōu)先選擇高分項目,且在高分和容易項目上分配了更多學(xué)習(xí)時間； 第三,本研究證實了在情境性指導(dǎo)語的誘發(fā)下,學(xué)習(xí)者對原有學(xué)習(xí)策略和計劃進(jìn)行了適當(dāng)調(diào)整,表現(xiàn)出情境性學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)的優(yōu)勢作用,進(jìn)一步為學(xué)習(xí)時間分配的議程模型提供了證據(jù)。
[Abstract]:The relationship between self-regulated learning and metacognition is very close. As one of the core components of metacognitive control, the allocation of learning time will also have an impact on the learning effect, especially under the influence of the concept of "autonomous learning" advocated by quality-oriented education. Educators pay more attention to students' motivation and learning process. The study on the allocation of learning time has been carried out for nearly 40 years, and its indicators mainly include two aspects: project selection and self-paced learning time. As the research progresses, the underlying mechanisms of learning time allocation remain controversial, ranging from the difference reduction model, the hierarchical model, the most recent learning area model to the most recent agenda based adjustment model. Researchers enrich the content and revise and perfect it on the basis of previous researches. They begin to explore the influence of other factors on the allocation of learning time besides the difficulty. As a hot topic in the field of learning motivation, achievement goal orientation has attracted more and more researchers' attention. The study of achievement goal orientation on the allocation of learning time is still being further developed and perfected. This study aims to explore the effects of idiosyncratic achievement goal orientation and situational achievement goal orientation on the learning time allocation of senior high school students in a complex situation of difficulty and score, in order to enrich the research on the influencing factors of learning time allocation. It provides empirical basis for agenda-based adjustment model and promotes the development of high school students' autonomous learning ability and the improvement of the quality of classroom teaching reform. The research adopts Metcalfe / 2002) experimental paradigm, which consists of two experiments, and sets up a complex situation in which the difficulty is not limited by time and the score is combined. Experiment 1 investigated the effects of trait achievement goal orientation on learning time allocation of senior high school students in complex situations. 70 senior high school students were selected as subjects, and a three-factor mixed experimental design was used. In experiment 2, the operation and testing procedures of situational achievement goal orientation were added to investigate the effects of idiosyncratic and situational achievement goal orientation on learning time allocation of senior high school students. 138 senior high school students were selected as subjects, and four factors were used to design a mixed experiment. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: first, in the complex situation with only idiosyncratic achievement goal orientation, all subjects tend to choose easy items to study first. However, more learning time is allocated to difficult items, while Achievement goal orientation learners give priority to choose and allocate more study time to high score items. Secondly, under the dual influence of idiosyncratic and situational achievement goal orientation, All learners were given priority to choose easy and high score items, but more time was allocated to difficult and high score items. Moreover, there are significant differences in project selection and time allocation among different situational achievement goal orientation learners in different difficulty and score items, that is, situational mastery goal learners tend to preferentially choose low score items. Moreover, more study time is allocated on low score and difficult items, while situational achievement target learners tend to give priority to high score items, and allocate more study time to high score and easy items. Third, The present study confirms that under the inducement of situational guidance, learners adjust their original learning strategies and plans appropriately, showing the advantage of situational learning goals, which provides further evidence for the agenda model of learning time allocation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沃建中,李峰;小學(xué)生的成就目標(biāo)和自主性動機之間的關(guān)系研究[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2002年01期

2 馬慶霞，郭德俊;掌握目標(biāo)與成績目標(biāo)對中學(xué)生動機模式的影響[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1996年01期

3 劉海驊,莊明科;成就動機的多重目標(biāo)理論[J];心理與行為研究;2004年02期

4 劉加霞,辛濤,黃高慶,申繼亮;中學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)動機、學(xué)習(xí)策略與學(xué)業(yè)成績的關(guān)系研究[J];教育理論與實踐;2000年09期

5 范春林;張大均;;學(xué)習(xí)動機研究的特點、問題及走向[J];教育研究;2007年07期

6 盧芝艷;;高中生成就目標(biāo)定向與自我調(diào)節(jié)學(xué)習(xí)關(guān)系研究[J];黑龍江教育(中學(xué)教學(xué)案例與研究);2009年06期

7 汪玲;;中學(xué)生目標(biāo)定向、創(chuàng)造性個性及兩者關(guān)系的研究[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年03期

8 周炎根;;大學(xué)生成就目標(biāo)定向特點分析[J];教育探索;2009年10期

9 陸先鵬;;國外成就目標(biāo)理論的新進(jìn)展及其對教育的啟示[J];唐山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年04期

10 莫文;羅善歡;;中學(xué)生目標(biāo)定向的發(fā)展趨勢調(diào)查[J];教育測量與評價(理論版);2012年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳松;自我調(diào)節(jié)學(xué)習(xí)中成就目標(biāo)的動機效應(yīng)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2027976