本文選題：疼痛共情 + 內(nèi)群體��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：研究一般社會(huì)群體條件下和最簡(jiǎn)單群體條件下人們對(duì)他人疼痛共情的內(nèi)外群體效應(yīng)情況如何,探索特質(zhì)共情認(rèn)知成分和情感成分在人們疼痛共情過(guò)程的作用怎樣。 方法：實(shí)驗(yàn)一：選取心理學(xué)專業(yè)群體和教育技術(shù)專業(yè)群體有效被試共48名,首先完成IRI-C量表,再進(jìn)行疼痛判斷任務(wù)實(shí)驗(yàn)程序操作,以疼痛程度評(píng)分和反應(yīng)時(shí)作為因變量指標(biāo),最后完成群體傾向評(píng)定問卷,檢驗(yàn)在一般社會(huì)群體條件下被試疼痛共情的內(nèi)外群體效應(yīng)及特質(zhì)共情認(rèn)知成分和情感成分對(duì)被試疼痛共情的作用。 實(shí)驗(yàn)二：選取有效大學(xué)生被試56名,首先完成IRI-C量表,通過(guò)虛假人格問卷測(cè)試進(jìn)行最簡(jiǎn)單群體分類,之后進(jìn)行疼痛判斷任務(wù)實(shí)驗(yàn)程序操作,以疼痛程度評(píng)分和反應(yīng)時(shí)作為因變量指標(biāo),最后完成群體傾向評(píng)定問卷,檢驗(yàn)最簡(jiǎn)單群體條件被試疼痛共情的內(nèi)外群體效應(yīng)及特質(zhì)共情認(rèn)知成分和情感成分對(duì)被試疼痛共情的作用。 結(jié)果：實(shí)驗(yàn)一：疼痛判斷任務(wù)的疼痛評(píng)分上,疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激主效應(yīng)顯著,內(nèi)群體立場(chǎng)和外群體立場(chǎng)主效應(yīng)顯著；刺激(疼痛、非疼痛)與對(duì)象立場(chǎng)(內(nèi)群體、外群體)的交互作用顯著,進(jìn)一步的簡(jiǎn)單效應(yīng)分析得到,疼痛刺激水平上,內(nèi)外群體的簡(jiǎn)單效應(yīng)顯著,被試對(duì)內(nèi)群體的疼痛評(píng)分顯著高于對(duì)外群體的疼痛評(píng)分。疼痛判斷任務(wù)的反應(yīng)時(shí)上,疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激主效應(yīng)顯著,刺激與對(duì)象立場(chǎng)交互作用顯著,進(jìn)一步的簡(jiǎn)單效應(yīng)分析得到,對(duì)象立場(chǎng)水平上疼痛刺激與非疼痛刺激的簡(jiǎn)單效應(yīng)顯著,內(nèi)群體立場(chǎng)水平上被試對(duì)疼痛刺激與對(duì)非疼痛刺激的反應(yīng)時(shí)之差顯著短于外群體立場(chǎng)水平上被試對(duì)疼痛刺激與對(duì)非疼痛刺激的反應(yīng)時(shí)之差。被試在IRI-C情感成分(共情關(guān)注和個(gè)人憂傷)分量表上的得分與在疼痛判斷任務(wù)中的表現(xiàn)得分的相關(guān)多于被試在IRI-C認(rèn)知成分(觀點(diǎn)采擇和想象)分量表上的得分與在疼痛判斷任務(wù)中的表現(xiàn)得分的相關(guān)。 實(shí)驗(yàn)二：疼痛判斷任務(wù)的疼痛評(píng)分上,疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激的主效應(yīng)顯著,內(nèi)群體立場(chǎng)與外群體立場(chǎng)的主效應(yīng)顯著,刺激(疼痛、非疼痛)與對(duì)象立場(chǎng)(內(nèi)群體、外群體)的交互作用顯著,進(jìn)一步的簡(jiǎn)單效應(yīng)分析得到,疼痛刺激水平上內(nèi)外群體立場(chǎng)的簡(jiǎn)單效應(yīng)顯著,被試對(duì)內(nèi)群體的疼痛評(píng)分顯著高于對(duì)外群體的疼痛評(píng)分。疼痛判斷任務(wù)的反應(yīng)時(shí)上,疼痛刺激與非疼痛刺激主效應(yīng)顯著,內(nèi)群體立場(chǎng)與外群體立場(chǎng)的主效應(yīng)顯著,刺激(疼痛、非疼痛)與對(duì)象立場(chǎng)(內(nèi)群體、外群體)的交互作用顯著,進(jìn)一步的簡(jiǎn)單效應(yīng)分析得到,疼痛刺激水平上,內(nèi)外群體立場(chǎng)的簡(jiǎn)單效應(yīng)顯著,被試對(duì)內(nèi)群體的反應(yīng)時(shí)顯著短于對(duì)外群體的反應(yīng)時(shí)。被試在IRI-C情感成分(共情關(guān)注、個(gè)人憂傷)分量表上的得分與被試在疼痛判斷任務(wù)中的表現(xiàn)得分的相關(guān)多于被試在IRI-C認(rèn)知成分(觀點(diǎn)采擇、想象)分量表上的得分與在疼痛判斷任務(wù)中的表現(xiàn)分的相關(guān)。 結(jié)論：1、在一般社會(huì)群體條件下,被試對(duì)他人的疼痛共情是內(nèi)群體偏好的；2、在最簡(jiǎn)單群體條件下,被試對(duì)他人的疼痛共情是內(nèi)群體偏好的；3、特質(zhì)共情的情感成分在被試對(duì)他人的疼痛共情過(guò)程中起主要作用。
[Abstract]:Objective: To investigate how the internal and external population effects on the pain empathy of others under the conditions of general social group and the simplest group, and how to explore the role of idiosyncratic empathy cognitive components and emotional components in the process of pain empathy.
Method: Experiment 1: a total of 48 subjects were selected from the professional psychology group and the educational technology group. First, the IRI-C scale was completed and the experimental procedure of the pain judgment task was performed. The pain degree score and the response time were used as the dependent variable index. Finally, the group tendency assessment questionnaire was completed, and the test was tested under the general social group condition. The effects of empathy on internal and external groups and the effects of empathy, cognitive components and emotional components on empathy were tested.
Experiment two: select 56 effective college students, first complete the IRI-C scale, carry out the simplest group classification through the false personality questionnaire test, then carry out the experiment procedure of the pain judgment task, take the pain degree score and the response time as the dependent variable index, finally complete the group tendency assessment questionnaire, and test the simplest group condition. The effects of empathy on internal and external groups and the effects of empathy, cognitive components and emotional components on empathy were tested.
Results: on the pain score, the main effect of pain stimulation and non pain stimulation was significant, the internal group position and the external group stand main effect was significant; the stimulation (pain, non pain) and the object position (internal group, external group) had significant interaction, further simple effect analysis, the level of pain stimulation, inside. The simple effect of the external group was significant. The pain score of the group was significantly higher than that of the external group. The response time of the pain judgment task, the main effect of pain stimulation and non pain stimulus was significant, the interaction between the stimulus and the object was significant, the further simple effect was analyzed, and the pain stimulation and the pain stimulation at the level of the object stand. The simple effect of non pain stimulation was significant. The difference between the pain stimulation and the response to the non pain stimulus at the internal group standpoint level was significantly shorter than the difference between the pain stimulus and the response to the non pain stimulus at the outside group position. The scores of the subjects on the IRI-C emotional components (empathy concern and personal sadness) subscale The correlation between the scores on the performance of the pain judgment task was more than the score on the IRI-C cognitive component (view selection and imagination) subscale and the score in the pain judgment task.
Experiment two: the main effect of pain irritation and non pain stimulation was significant in pain judgment task, the main effect of internal group stand and outside group stand was significant, stimulation (pain, non pain) and object position (internal group, external group) had significant interaction, and a simple effect analysis was obtained, and the internal and external groups of pain stimulation level were obtained. The simple effect of the body position was significant, and the pain score of the group was significantly higher than that of the external group. The response time of the pain judgment task, the main effect of pain stimulation and non pain stimulation, the main effect of the internal group position and the outside group stand were significant, the stimulation (pain, non pain) and the object position (internal group, external group). The interaction is significant, and further simple effect analysis shows that the simple effect of the internal and external group stand is significant on the level of pain stimulation, and the response of the subjects to the internal group is significantly shorter than that of the external group. The scores of the subjects on the IRI-C emotional components (empathy concern, personal sadness) and the table of the subjects in the pain judgment task The score of the present score is more than that of the score of the IRI-C cognitive component (opinion taking, imagination) subscale and the performance score in the pain judgment task.
Conclusion: 1, under the general social group conditions, the pain empathy of the subjects is an internal group preference; 2, under the simplest group conditions, the pain empathy of the subjects is the internal group preference; 3, the affective component of the trait empathy is the main effect of the pain empathy of others on Cheng Zhongqi.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 呂慶燕;王有智;;藏族、漢族大學(xué)生內(nèi)外群體偏愛效應(yīng)的差異研究[J];西北民族研究;2011年03期

2 李春;宮秀麗;;自我分類理論概述[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

3 肖仁梅,趙洪英;小兒術(shù)后疼痛控制及護(hù)理進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用護(hù)理雜志;2005年02期

4 徐大真;性別刻板印象之性別效應(yīng)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2003年04期

5 程真波;黃宇霞;;疼痛共情的神經(jīng)機(jī)制[J];心理科學(xué);2012年02期

6 孟景;陳有國(guó);黃希庭;;疼痛共情的影響因素及其認(rèn)知機(jī)制[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2010年03期

7 朱玄;尚慶萍;胡娟;郭秀艷;;痛苦共情的功能性核磁共振成像研究述評(píng)[J];心理學(xué)探新;2012年02期

8 張建玲;趙玉芳;;群際威脅與對(duì)內(nèi)群體和外群體支持決策的關(guān)系研究[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2024322