本文選題：親密關(guān)系 + 權(quán)力感知�。� 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：親密關(guān)系中的權(quán)力問題歷來受到社會學(xué)和心理學(xué)的重視,許多領(lǐng)域?qū)?quán)力理解為一種人際間的結(jié)構(gòu)變量,心理學(xué)對此的研究起步較晚,并逐步將其理解為一種心理變量。這種對自身影響他人能力的認知被稱為權(quán)力感,它比個體擁有的實際權(quán)力更能影響自身的態(tài)度和行為。常用的權(quán)力理論主要包括社會交換理論、相互依存理論、接近-抑制理論以及情境聚焦理論。親密側(cè)重的是合作與分享,權(quán)力側(cè)重的是人際關(guān)系中控制和影響。當親密遇上權(quán)力,兩性會如何感知,這種權(quán)力感會受哪些因素的影響,又會給親密關(guān)系帶來怎樣的影響,這種影響是否受到了其他因素的影響,這將是本研究關(guān)注的問題。本研究旨在中國文化背景下,以定量與定性兩種研究方法對親密關(guān)系中的權(quán)力感知進行研究。對權(quán)力感的研究大多采用自評量表的方式,現(xiàn)階段對權(quán)力感的內(nèi)隱測量研究較少,因此研究一中對親密關(guān)系權(quán)力分配感知的測量采用性關(guān)系權(quán)力量表(SRPS)和單類內(nèi)隱聯(lián)想測驗(SC-IAT),將外顯測量和內(nèi)隱測量相結(jié)合,以成對的異性戀情侶為被試進行研究,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),無論采用哪種測量方式,兩性的權(quán)力感均存在差異。在親密關(guān)系權(quán)力感的外顯測量中,女性權(quán)力感顯著大于男性權(quán)力感,其中男性權(quán)力感處于中等水平,女生權(quán)力感屬于高水平,意味著男性在親密關(guān)系中的權(quán)力感知相對平衡,而女性權(quán)力感較高;在親密關(guān)系權(quán)力感知的內(nèi)隱測量中,男性認為權(quán)力與彼此的聯(lián)結(jié)相對平衡,女性則認為權(quán)力與伴侶的聯(lián)結(jié)更加緊密。兩種測量方式之間結(jié)果相關(guān)不顯著。對權(quán)力感知與關(guān)系滿意度的探討,我們采用行動者-對象互依模型(APIM),結(jié)果表明,權(quán)力感可以正向預(yù)測關(guān)系滿意度,具體表現(xiàn)為男性外顯權(quán)力感越高,對關(guān)系越滿意,女性內(nèi)隱權(quán)力感越高,對關(guān)系越滿意。為進一步探討權(quán)力感知不同水平的具體表現(xiàn),權(quán)力感知的影響因素以及權(quán)力感對關(guān)系滿意度的影響,著重展示親密關(guān)系中個體的主觀感受,研究二采用質(zhì)的研究,對正處于親密關(guān)系中或者曾經(jīng)有過戀愛經(jīng)歷的個體進行了半結(jié)構(gòu)化的訪談,然后將訪談錄音轉(zhuǎn)錄成電子文本,使用Nvivo 10質(zhì)性分析軟件對其進行編碼,運用扎根理論,對文字材料進行類屬分析和情景分析。結(jié)果表明,首先,對親密關(guān)系中權(quán)力的理解主要包括發(fā)言權(quán)與最終決定權(quán)的大小,對關(guān)系的控制、影響及獨立自主的能力以及擔負的責任等;其次,影響親密關(guān)系權(quán)力感的因素主要包括相對的情感卷入、替代性選擇、能力和性格等個人因素以及父母之間的夫妻關(guān)系和父母對子女的教養(yǎng)方式等家庭環(huán)境因素。最后,親密關(guān)系中的權(quán)力感知與關(guān)系評價并沒有確切的對應(yīng)關(guān)系,是否看重關(guān)系權(quán)力以及理想的權(quán)力類型等都會對其產(chǎn)生影響。
[Abstract]:The issue of power in intimate relations has always been paid attention to by sociology and psychology. In many fields, power is understood as a kind of interpersonal structural variable. The study of psychology is late and is gradually understood as a psychological variable. This cognition of self influence on others is called the sense of power, which is more real than the individual. The common power theory mainly includes the social exchange theory, the interdependence theory, the close inhibition theory and the situational focus theory. The close emphasis is on cooperation and sharing, and the power is focused on the control and influence in the interpersonal relationship. When intimacy meets power, how does the sexes perceive, this right? This study aims to study the perception of power in close ties with two methods of quantitative and qualitative research in the context of Chinese culture. Most of the studies are based on the self rating scale. At the present stage, there is little research on the implicit measurement of the sense of power. Therefore, the measurement of the perception of the power distribution of intimate relationships is based on the sexual relationship power scale (SRPS) and the single class implicit association test (SC-IAT), combining explicit and implicit measurements with paired heterosexual couples as subjects. The results show that there are differences in the sense of power between the two sexes. In the explicit measurement of intimate relationship power, the feminine sense of power is significantly greater than the male sense of power, in which the male sense of power is at the middle level and the feminine power is high, which means that the men's power perception in intimacy is relatively flat. The feminine sense of power is higher; in the implicit measurement of the perception of intimate relationship power, men think that power is relatively balanced with each other, while women think that power is closer to the partner. The correlation between the two ways of measurement is not significant. Model (APIM), the results show that the sense of power can positively predict the relationship satisfaction, which is manifested by the higher the sense of empowerment of men, the more satisfied with the relationship, the higher the sense of implicit power in women, the more satisfied with the relationship, and the specific performance of different levels of power perception, the influence factors of power perception and the satisfaction of the sense of power to the relationship. The influence is to show the subjective feelings of the individual in the intimate relationship. Study two adopts the qualitative research, conducts a semi structured interview to the individuals who are in close relationship or have had a love experience, and then transcribe the interview recording into electronic text, and use the Nvivo 10 qualitative analysis software to code it, and use the grounded theory. The results show that, first, the understanding of power in intimate relationships mainly includes the size of the right to speak and the final decision, the control of the relationship, the influence and the ability to be independent and the responsibility, and secondly, the factors that affect the sense of intimacy mainly include relative emotional involvement, Alternative choice, individual factors such as ability and character and family environment factors such as parents' relationship between husband and wife and parental rearing of their children. Finally, there is no exact correspondence between the perception of power and the relationship evaluation in intimacy, and whether the relation of power and the ideal type of power will affect it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王浩;俞國良;;親密關(guān)系中的權(quán)力認知[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2017年04期

2 楊文琪;李強;郭名揚;范謙;何伊麗;;權(quán)力感對個體的影響:調(diào)節(jié)定向的視角[J];心理學(xué)報;2017年03期

3 王雪;蔡，

本文編號：1975681