本文選題：謊言行為 + 誘發(fā)性創(chuàng)造力　； 參考：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：謊言行為蘊(yùn)含在生活的方方面面。從商業(yè)到運(yùn)動(dòng)比賽,再到學(xué)校等,謊言行為已經(jīng)滲透生活和學(xué)習(xí)中的各個(gè)層面。近年來,謊言行為越來越普遍,給個(gè)體、團(tuán)體和社會(huì)都帶來較大的負(fù)面影響。因此,對謊言行為的研究極具理論意義和實(shí)踐意義。創(chuàng)造力是個(gè)體根據(jù)一定的目的,運(yùn)用一切已知信息,產(chǎn)生出某種新穎、獨(dú)特、有社會(huì)意義或個(gè)人價(jià)值的產(chǎn)品的智力品質(zhì)。大多數(shù)關(guān)于創(chuàng)造力的研究常聚焦于創(chuàng)造力的積極方面,認(rèn)為創(chuàng)造力在個(gè)體,組織和社會(huì)等層面具有較多益處。而鮮有研究將創(chuàng)造力與謊言等不道德行為聯(lián)系起來。世間的善與惡往往不如我們想象的那樣涇渭分明。同樣,創(chuàng)造力也有黑暗的一面,也會(huì)產(chǎn)生不良的、消極的產(chǎn)品和結(jié)果,謊言行為就是其中一種。本論文從探討創(chuàng)造力與謊言行為兩者關(guān)系出發(fā),為解決創(chuàng)造力與謊言行為的關(guān)系問題,基于現(xiàn)有研究,初步探索誘發(fā)性創(chuàng)造力傾向與創(chuàng)造力風(fēng)格對謊言行為的影響。本文共有兩項(xiàng)研究,研究一目的在于分別驗(yàn)證誘發(fā)性創(chuàng)造力傾向與創(chuàng)造力風(fēng)格對大學(xué)生謊言行為的影響,研究二則在研究一的基礎(chǔ)上,考察創(chuàng)造力與道德凸顯性對大學(xué)生謊言行為的影響。兩個(gè)研究均以視覺感知任務(wù)作為測量謊言行為的研究方法,并根據(jù)大學(xué)生人群特點(diǎn),對視覺感知任務(wù)做出相應(yīng)的改編,以適應(yīng)被試群體。研究一包含研究1a和研究1b兩個(gè)子研究。研究1a旨在通過組合句子范式誘發(fā)暫時(shí)性的創(chuàng)造力,設(shè)置創(chuàng)造力誘發(fā)組與控制組,并以遠(yuǎn)距離聯(lián)想測驗(yàn)(RAT)作為操作性檢查,考察誘發(fā)性的創(chuàng)造力傾向?qū)χe言行為的影響。研究1b目的在于探查特質(zhì)性創(chuàng)造力——?jiǎng)?chuàng)造風(fēng)格對謊言行為的影響。研究二是基于研究一的結(jié)果,加入了道德凸顯性這一變量,進(jìn)一步探索道德凸顯性對創(chuàng)造力與大學(xué)生謊言行為關(guān)系的影響。本論文通過兩個(gè)研究中三個(gè)子研究,在有關(guān)創(chuàng)造力與謊言行為的關(guān)系上得出如下結(jié)論:(1)以我國大學(xué)生為被試,在實(shí)驗(yàn)室條件下誘發(fā)創(chuàng)造力傾向的個(gè)體說謊行為會(huì)有所減少。(2)創(chuàng)造性風(fēng)格中對規(guī)則的順從度越低,破壞規(guī)則的可能性越大的個(gè)體,其謊言行為越少。(3)當(dāng)個(gè)體關(guān)注自身內(nèi)部道德規(guī)則或準(zhǔn)則時(shí),更有可能做出謊言行為(4)在對謊言行為的影響上,道德凸顯性和誘發(fā)性創(chuàng)造力的交互作用不顯著。
[Abstract]:Lies lie in every aspect of life. From business to sports, to school, lies have permeated all levels of life and learning. In recent years, lie behavior is becoming more and more common, which brings negative effects to individuals, groups and society. Therefore, the study of the behavior of lies is of great theoretical and practical significance. Creativity is the intellectual quality of a product that is novel, unique and of social significance or individual value by using all known information according to a certain purpose. Most studies on creativity focus on the positive aspects of creativity, and think that creativity has many benefits at the individual, organizational and social levels. Little research has linked creativity to immoral behaviors such as lies. The world's good and evil are often not as distinct as we think. Similarly, creativity has a dark side and can produce bad, negative products and outcomes, among them lies. In order to solve the problem of the relationship between creativity and lie behavior, this paper explores the influence of induced creativity tendency and creativity style on lie behavior based on the existing research on the relationship between creativity and lie behavior. There are two studies in this paper, one is to verify the influence of induced creativity tendency and creativity style on college students' lie behavior, the other is based on the first study. To investigate the influence of creativity and moral salience on college students'lies. The two studies used visual perception task as the research method to measure lie behavior and adapted the visual perception task according to the characteristics of college students in order to adapt to the subjects. Study I includes two sub-studies, study 1a and study 1b. The purpose of study 1a was to induce temporary creativity through sentence combination paradigm, set up creative induction group and control group, and use distance association test (RATT) as an operational test to investigate the influence of induced creativity tendency on lie behavior. The goal of the 1 b study was to explore the effects of idiosyncratic creativity-creative styles on lies. The second study is based on the results of the first study, adding moral salience as a variable to further explore the impact of moral salience on the relationship between creativity and college students' lies. In this paper, through three sub-studies in two studies, we draw the following conclusion on the relationship between creativity and lie behavior: (1) take Chinese college students as subjects. Individuals who induce creative tendencies in the laboratory will have less lying behavior.) the lower the degree of compliance to the rules in the creative style, the more likely they are to break the rules. The less lie behavior is, the more likely it is to make lie behavior when individuals pay attention to their own internal moral rules or norms. 4) the interaction between moral salience and induced creativity is not significant in the influence of lie behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B848

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 貢U，

本文編號：1970857