本文選題：彩色 + 道德判斷��； 參考：《浙江理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在人們的日常生活中,道德判斷道德選擇無(wú)處不在,對(duì)道德問(wèn)題的研究是現(xiàn)今研究熱點(diǎn)之一。隨著具身認(rèn)知理論的不斷發(fā)展,在道德領(lǐng)域,研究者們也開(kāi)始關(guān)注身體感知覺(jué)對(duì)于道德認(rèn)知的影響。已有研究證明了黑白顏色與道德概念之間存在隱喻聯(lián)結(jié),即"白好黑壞"。但是,以往對(duì)于顏色影響道德的研究大多集中在黑白兩個(gè)顏色,缺乏對(duì)彩色的影響作用的探討,且以往實(shí)驗(yàn)中大多以行為實(shí)驗(yàn)為主,沒(méi)有從神經(jīng)認(rèn)知角度考察顏色影響道德的機(jī)制。因此,本研究試圖考察彩色在道德認(rèn)知中的作用,并探索其神經(jīng)機(jī)制。本研究由三個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)組成,實(shí)驗(yàn)一和實(shí)驗(yàn)二在行為層面考察彩色對(duì)道德認(rèn)知加工的影響,其中實(shí)驗(yàn)一采用道德Stroop范式考察彩色對(duì)于道德詞語(yǔ)判斷的影響,實(shí)驗(yàn)二選取了經(jīng)典的道德兩難故事,在較為復(fù)雜的情境中,探討彩色對(duì)于道德判斷的影響。實(shí)驗(yàn)三在神經(jīng)機(jī)制層面,采用Stroop范式,結(jié)合事件相關(guān)電位技術(shù)(eventrelatedpotential,ERP)考察彩色影響道德詞語(yǔ)判斷的時(shí)間進(jìn)程和神經(jīng)機(jī)制。研究結(jié)果表明:(1)在行為層面,彩色會(huì)影響個(gè)體對(duì)道德詞語(yǔ)的判斷,綠色與道德概念具有隱喻聯(lián)結(jié);但在復(fù)雜情境中,彩色對(duì)道德認(rèn)知的影響不顯著。(2)彩色對(duì)于道德詞語(yǔ)加工的影響涉及三個(gè)加工階段:首先,在以P200成分為代表的早期注意加工階段,彩色與道德概念并行加工;其次,在以N300為代表的知覺(jué)語(yǔ)義加工階段,不同顏色在語(yǔ)義整合中會(huì)產(chǎn)生不同的影響作用,人們會(huì)花費(fèi)更多的時(shí)間整合綠色的隱喻信息和不道德詞語(yǔ);在以L(fǎng)PC(Late positive component,LPC)為代表的晚期道德推理評(píng)估加工階段,顏色對(duì)于道德概念加工的影響仍舊存在。本研究考察了顏色對(duì)于道德認(rèn)知的影響作用,彌補(bǔ)了傳統(tǒng)研究中關(guān)于彩色與道德研究的空缺,同時(shí),也從神經(jīng)機(jī)制的層面探討了顏色與道德概念隱喻聯(lián)結(jié)的問(wèn)題,是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)道德研究及顏色影響認(rèn)知加工領(lǐng)域較好的補(bǔ)充,也能為今后在一些場(chǎng)景布置設(shè)計(jì)中(如法庭)提供實(shí)踐指導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:In people's daily life, moral judgment and moral choice are everywhere. With the development of the theory of physical cognition, researchers begin to pay attention to the influence of body perception on moral cognition in the field of morality. Studies have shown that there is a metaphorical link between black and white color and moral concepts, that is, "white is good and black is bad". However, in the past, most of the researches on color influence morality focused on black and white, lacking of discussion on the effect of color, and most of the previous experiments focused on behavior experiments. There is no mechanism by which color affects morality from a neurocognitive perspective. Therefore, this study attempts to explore the role of color in moral cognition and explore its neural mechanism. This study consists of three experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 examine the influence of color on moral cognitive processing at the behavioral level. Experiment 1 uses moral Stroop paradigm to examine the influence of color on moral word judgment. In the second experiment, the classical moral dilemma is selected, and the influence of color on moral judgment is discussed in more complex situations. At the level of neural mechanism, experiment 3 uses Stroop paradigm and event-related potentialpotential potential (ERP) to investigate the time course and neural mechanism of color influencing the judgment of moral words. The results show that at the behavioral level, color affects the individual's judgment of moral words. Green has a metaphorical connection with moral concepts, but in complex situations, The influence of color on moral cognition is not significant. (2) the influence of color on the processing of moral words involves three processing stages: first, in the early attention processing stage represented by P200, color and moral concepts are processed in parallel; secondly, In the stage of perceptual semantic processing represented by N300, different colors will have different effects on semantic integration, and people will spend more time integrating green metaphorical information and immoral words. In the late stage of moral reasoning evaluation, represented by LPC(Late positive component, the influence of color on moral concept processing still exists. This study examines the influence of color on moral cognition, and makes up for the gap in traditional studies on color and morality. At the same time, it also discusses the connection between color and metaphor of moral concept from the level of neural mechanism. It is a good supplement to the traditional moral research and color influence cognitive processing field, and can also provide practical guidance in some scene layout design (such as the court) in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 陳瀟;江琦;侯敏;朱夢(mèng)音;;具身道德:道德心理學(xué)研究的新取向[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2014年06期

2 殷融;葉浩生;;道德概念的黑白隱喻表征及其對(duì)道德認(rèn)知的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2014年09期

3 王锃;魯忠義;;道德概念的垂直空間隱喻及其對(duì)認(rèn)知的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2013年05期

4 張騰霄;韓布新;;紅色的心理效應(yīng):現(xiàn)象與機(jī)制研究述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年03期

5 熊蕾;;英漢顏色詞“黃”“綠”“紅”的概念隱喻認(rèn)知與文化對(duì)比分析[J];河南廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

6 李宏翰;許闖;;道德隱喻:道德研究的隱喻視角[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年05期

7 葉浩生;;鏡像神經(jīng)元:認(rèn)知具身性的神經(jīng)生物學(xué)證據(jù)[J];心理學(xué)探新;2012年01期

8 黃宇霞;羅躍嘉;;負(fù)性情緒刺激是否總是優(yōu)先得到加工:ERP研究[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2009年09期

9 黃麗,楊廷忠,季忠民;正性負(fù)性情緒量表的中國(guó)人群適用性研究[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2003年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 趙伯妮;味覺(jué)與道德判斷：情緒與自我概念的作用[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2012年

2 馬子鳳;基礎(chǔ)顏色隱喻的情緒效價(jià)研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2012年

3 周靜;漢語(yǔ)情緒詞的顏色隱喻表征及其對(duì)顏色知覺(jué)的影響[D];河北師范大學(xué);2012年

4 譚爽;萊考夫概念隱喻專(zhuān)題研究[D];沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué);2012年

5 歐曉莉;距離遠(yuǎn)近和關(guān)系親疏對(duì)道德判斷的影響[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2011年

6 闞忠鈺;心理距離對(duì)道德判斷的影響[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

7 楊蕾;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)顏色詞之認(rèn)知研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2009年

8 阮芝梨;越南語(yǔ)和漢語(yǔ)基本顏色詞的對(duì)比研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1871997