本文選題：中國 + 父母教養(yǎng)方式�。� 參考：《皖南醫(yī)學院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：通過調查研究確定具有中國國情和文化背景下的教養(yǎng)方式的評價維度，編制一套適用于國內(nèi)教養(yǎng)方式的評價量表，并對其進行信效度檢驗。研究父母教養(yǎng)方式特點，探討人口學變量對父母教養(yǎng)方式差異的影響。 方法：研究嚴格按照心理學量表編制的程序。在文獻綜述的基礎上，根據(jù)理論構想結合對150名專家和大學生開放式問卷調查，，編制了父母教養(yǎng)方式的初試量表。然后對390名大學生進行初試量表的調查后，運用探索性因素分析進一步形成了正式量表，并運用驗證性因素分析驗證研究的結構模型。最后收集1458份正式量表，運用多種信效度檢驗方法驗證量表的信效度，并調查研究中國父母教養(yǎng)方式的特點。 結果： 1.探索性因素分析KMO值為0.931，驗證性因素分析，χ2/df、RMSE、NFI、NNFI、IFI、CFI、GFI、AGFI指數(shù)分別是3.605、0.039、0.835、0.882、0.806、0.805、0.892、0.860。 2.信度：量表的Cronbach’sα系數(shù)在0.717-0.893之間；分半信度在0.691-0.875之間；重測信度在0.725-0.871之間。 2.效度：各維度得分與量表總分的相關系數(shù)在0.770—0.894之間；各個維度之間的相關系數(shù)在0.457—0.755之間。與效標量表比較，民主關懷因子與情感溫暖型的相關系數(shù)為0.675，；情感聯(lián)系因子與情感溫暖型的相關系數(shù)為0.722，；專制粗暴因子與專制型的相關系數(shù)為0.806；管教引導因子與信任鼓勵型的相關系數(shù)為0.599；寬容理解與信任鼓勵型的相關系數(shù)為0.649；兩個量表總分的相關系數(shù)為0.830。 結論： 1.父母教養(yǎng)方式是受多種因素影響的動態(tài)和靜態(tài)不斷交替變換的行為方式和風格，本研究編制的評價量表是由民主關懷、情感聯(lián)系、專制粗暴、管教引導、寬容理解構成的多因子結構，該量表具有很好的模型結構。 2.參照父母教養(yǎng)方式結構的理論構想，編制了父母教養(yǎng)方式評價量表對1458名中學生進行調查研究,結果表明該量表的內(nèi)部一致性系數(shù)、分半信度、內(nèi)容效度、效標效度等信效度指標均比較好，所以父母教養(yǎng)方式評價量表適宜作為評價父母教養(yǎng)方式的評價工具。 3.父母教養(yǎng)方式的情感聯(lián)系得分最高，其次為管教引導、寬容理解、民主關懷，專制粗暴得分最低。 4.父母教養(yǎng)方式在不同的子女性別、居住地、家庭類型以及父母的職業(yè)和文化等方面得分差異很大。
[Abstract]:Objective: to determine the evaluation dimension of upbringing style under Chinese national conditions and cultural background, and to develop a set of evaluation scale for domestic upbringing style, and to test its reliability and validity. To study the characteristics of parental rearing style and the influence of demographic variables on parental rearing style. Methods: the program of psychological scale was studied. On the basis of literature review, an open questionnaire survey of 150 experts and college students was carried out according to the theory and conception, and the first test scale of parental rearing style was compiled. After the investigation of 390 college students, the formal scale was further formed by exploratory factor analysis, and the structural model of the study was verified by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, 1458 formal scales were collected to verify the reliability and validity of the scale by various reliability and validity tests, and the characteristics of Chinese parental rearing styles were investigated. Results: 1. Exploratory factor analysis (KMO) was 0.931, and confirmatory factor analysis (蠂 ~ 2 / dfN) showed that the AGFI index of KMO was 3.6050.39 鹵0.8350.882n 0.806U 0.8050.8920.860, respectively. 2. Reliability: the Cronbach's 偽 coefficient of the scale was 0.717-0.893, the split-half reliability was 0.691-0.875, and the test-retest reliability was 0.725-0.871. 2. Validity: the correlation coefficient between the scores of each dimension and the total score of the scale was 0.770-0.894, and the correlation coefficient between each dimension was between 0.457-0.755. Compared with the effect scale, The correlation coefficient between democratic care factor and affective warmth type is 0.675, the correlation coefficient between affective relation factor and affective warm type is 0.722, the correlation coefficient between autocratic and autocratic factor is 0.806, and the relationship between correctional guidance factor and trust and encouragement type is 0.806. The correlation coefficient between tolerance, understanding and trust and encouragement was 0.649, and the correlation coefficient of the total score of the two scales was 0.830. Conclusion: 1. Parental rearing style is a dynamic and static alternating behavior style and style influenced by many factors. The evaluation scale developed in this study is guided by democratic concern, emotional connection, tyranny and discipline. Tolerance and understanding of the multi-factor structure, the scale has a good model structure. 2. According to the theoretical conception of parental rearing style structure, 1458 middle school students were investigated with the parental rearing style evaluation scale. The results showed that the internal consistency coefficient, split-half reliability, content validity of the scale were analyzed. The reliability and validity of standard validity were good, so the parental rearing style evaluation scale was suitable as an evaluation tool for parents' rearing style. 3. Parental rearing style had the highest score of emotional connection, followed by guidance of discipline, tolerance and understanding, democratic care, and tyranny and rudeness. 4. Parental rearing styles differ greatly in terms of gender, residence, family type, occupation and culture of the child.
【學位授予單位】：皖南醫(yī)學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B844

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 王曉陽;國外關于不同階層家庭教養(yǎng)方式的研究[J];北京師范大學學報;1993年05期

2 鄒玉龍;;家庭教養(yǎng)方式研究綜述[J];赤峰學院學報(科學教育版);2011年01期

3 王R

本文編號：1871787