發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-09 19:20

  本文選題：合作行為 + 自我建構(gòu)��； 參考：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)人們遇到集體利益和個(gè)人利益發(fā)生矛盾沖突時(shí),如何協(xié)調(diào)兩者之間的關(guān)系,是在當(dāng)前競(jìng)爭(zhēng)日益激烈的環(huán)境下,人們經(jīng)常需要面對(duì)的兩難問題情境。對(duì)于大學(xué)生來說,不論是在獨(dú)特的宿舍文化還是在科研合作等方面,都需要在集體和個(gè)體利益間做出有效權(quán)衡,同樣需要應(yīng)對(duì)各種各樣的兩難問題。研究大學(xué)生決策的影響因素,有利于指導(dǎo)大學(xué)生做出正確的決策選擇,同時(shí)也有利于引導(dǎo)其形成更為成熟的社會(huì)交往模式。自我建構(gòu)不同的個(gè)體對(duì)于合作行為選擇并不一致,而且有研究發(fā)現(xiàn)自我建構(gòu)與解釋水平對(duì)合作有重要的影響。但一般都是分別對(duì)二者進(jìn)行研究,沒有關(guān)于其交互作用的分析,而且在不同反饋方式下探討這兩個(gè)因素對(duì)合作的影響的研究,目前來說還非常少。本研究試圖從自我建構(gòu)與解釋水平角度探討社會(huì)兩難情境中個(gè)體的合作行為,特別是不同反饋條件下的自我建構(gòu)和解釋水平對(duì)個(gè)體合作行為產(chǎn)生的影響。本研究以社會(huì)兩難問題研究中的公共物品兩難實(shí)驗(yàn)范式作為任務(wù)情境,運(yùn)用問卷和實(shí)驗(yàn)室實(shí)驗(yàn)相結(jié)合的方法,以大學(xué)生為實(shí)驗(yàn)被試,采用2×2的被試間實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),對(duì)自我建構(gòu)類型以及解釋水平兩個(gè)因素來進(jìn)行研究,并探討其在不同反饋方式下的合作傾向。通過對(duì)實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,得出的研究結(jié)論如下:1.自我建構(gòu)類型對(duì)合作行為的主效應(yīng)顯著。社會(huì)兩難情境下,自我建構(gòu)類型對(duì)于個(gè)體的合作行為的影響存在差異。相對(duì)于獨(dú)立型自我建構(gòu)的個(gè)體來說,依存型自我建構(gòu)的個(gè)體有更多的合作行為。2.反饋方式對(duì)合作行為的主效應(yīng)顯著。社會(huì)兩難情境下,不同的信息反饋方式對(duì)于個(gè)體的合作行為的影響不同。在集體反饋方式下個(gè)體的合作行為顯著高于在個(gè)人反饋方式下的個(gè)體。3.自我建構(gòu)與反饋方式存在交互作用:依存型自我建構(gòu)的個(gè)體受反饋方式的影響不大;而獨(dú)立型自我建構(gòu)的個(gè)體易受反饋方式影響,個(gè)人反饋方式下的獨(dú)立型自我建構(gòu)的個(gè)體的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)傾向更明顯。4.解釋水平對(duì)合作行為的主效應(yīng)顯著,在社會(huì)兩難的情境下,解釋水平高的個(gè)體比解釋水平低的個(gè)體有更高的合作傾向。5.解釋水平與反饋方式不存在交互作用。6.自我建構(gòu)與解釋水平存在交互作用:依存型自我建構(gòu)的個(gè)體無論在高解釋水平還是低解釋水平啟動(dòng)下其合作行為都較高,其差異不顯著;獨(dú)立型自我建構(gòu)的個(gè)體在高解釋水平啟動(dòng)下也有較高的合作行為,但在低解釋水平啟動(dòng)下其合作行為傾向則較低。
[Abstract]:When people encounter conflicts between collective and personal interests, how to coordinate their relationship is a dilemma that people often need to face under the increasingly fierce competition environment. For college students, both in the unique dormitory culture and in scientific research cooperation, they all need to be in the collective and the other. An effective trade-off between the interests of the body is also required to deal with a variety of dilemma. The study of the influencing factors of College Students' decision-making is conducive to guiding college students to make a correct decision and to guide them to form a more mature mode of social communication. And some studies have found that the level of self construction and interpretation has an important impact on cooperation. However, it is generally studied separately for the two, and there is no analysis of its interaction, and the study of the impact of the two factors on cooperation under different feedback methods is still very few. This study tries to construct and explain itself from the self construction. A study of the individual cooperative behavior in a social dilemma, especially the impact of the level of self construction and interpretation on the individual cooperative behavior under different feedback conditions. This study uses the paradigm of the public goods dilemma in the study of social dilemma as a task situation, and the method of combining questionnaires and laboratory experiments. Taking the college students as experimental subjects, the 2 x 2 experimental design was used to study the type of self construction and the two factors of the interpretation level, and to explore the cooperation tendency under different feedback methods. Through the statistical analysis of the experimental data, the conclusions are as follows: 1. the main effect of the type of self construction on the cooperative behavior is obvious. Under the situation of social dilemma, there are differences in the effect of self construction type on individual cooperative behavior. Relative to independent self constructed individuals, dependent self constructed individuals have more cooperative behavior and.2. feedback is significant to the main effect of cooperative behavior. In the two difficult situation of society, different ways of information feedback are used. The individual's cooperative behavior has different effects. In the way of collective feedback, the individual's cooperative behavior is significantly higher than that of the individual.3. self construction and feedback in the individual feedback mode: the independent self constructed individual is not influenced by the feedback mode; and the individual self constructed individual is susceptible to the feedback mode. The competitive tendency of individual self constructed individuals under the mode of human feedback is more obvious that the main effect of.4. interpretation level on cooperative behavior is significant. In the situation of social dilemma, the individuals with high level of interpretation have higher cooperative tendency than those with low level of interpretation, and there is no interaction effect of.6. self construction and solution on the.5. interpretation level and the way of feedback. The independent self constructed individuals have higher cooperation behavior regardless of the high interpretation level or low interpretation level, and their differences are not significant. Independent self constructed individuals also have higher cooperative behavior under the high interpretation level, but their cooperative behavior tends to be better under the low interpretation level. Low.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭慶科;許樹芳;;公共物品投資博弈中自我構(gòu)念與反饋方式對(duì)合作的影響[J];山東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

2 黃俊;李曄;張宏偉;;解釋水平理論的應(yīng)用及發(fā)展[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年01期

3 王振華;柴俊武;張倩;;群體購買情境下沖動(dòng)性購買影響研究:解釋水平視角[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2014年02期

4 王財(cái)玉;何安明;惠秋平;;時(shí)間距離與大學(xué)生自我-品牌聯(lián)結(jié)的價(jià)值偏好——解釋水平的視角[J];心理科學(xué);2013年04期

5 馬偉軍;馮睿;;中國大學(xué)生的自我建構(gòu)、利己歸因偏好與自我增強(qiáng)[J];心理科學(xué);2012年06期

6 孫曉玲;李曉文;;自我提高還是自我增強(qiáng)? 解釋水平理論的觀點(diǎn)[J];心理科學(xué);2012年02期

7 姚卿;陳榮;趙平;;自我構(gòu)念對(duì)想象廣告策略的影響與分析[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

8 曹華英;張林;;大學(xué)生的自我構(gòu)念與動(dòng)機(jī)定向關(guān)系研究[J];心理學(xué)探新;2010年01期

9 王沛;汲慧麗;;社會(huì)價(jià)值取向與反饋對(duì)動(dòng)態(tài)社會(huì)兩難決策的影響:以水資源兩難決策為例[J];心理與行為研究;2009年02期

10 王裕豪;袁慶華;徐琴美;;自我建構(gòu)量表(SCS)中文版的初步試用[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2008年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1867100