本文選題：轉換能力 + 創(chuàng)造性思維　； 參考：《南京師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：創(chuàng)造力是人類特有的一項高級認知能力,它是一種提出或產出具有新穎性和適切性的工作成果的能力。執(zhí)行功能是一種有目的的控制機制,能夠協調人類復雜的認知活動；它包括抑制、轉換、記憶刷新三個子成分。在傳統(tǒng)的創(chuàng)造力研究中,對發(fā)散思維的過度重視造成了創(chuàng)造性思維是去執(zhí)行控制的、注意力散焦的這一認知。然而創(chuàng)造性思維作為一種復雜的、高級的認知過程,必然會涉及執(zhí)行功能的監(jiān)控和計劃。同時,流體智力作為頗有爭議的創(chuàng)造力影響因子之一,它與創(chuàng)造性思維的關系也一直處于爭議中。雖然大多數有關研究顯示創(chuàng)造力和智力是兩個不同的不相關的能力,但近年來,隨著研究方法的發(fā)展,像潛變量分析的廣泛使用,研究者們開始重新思考流體智力與創(chuàng)造性思維之間的關系。 本研究通過潛變量分析,直接探討執(zhí)行控制中的轉換與創(chuàng)造性思維的關系,同時探討流體智力對執(zhí)行功能和創(chuàng)造性思維之間關系的中介作用與調節(jié)作用。 研究對104名被試的創(chuàng)造性思維、轉換能力和流體智力進行了測量。結果發(fā)現轉換能力與流體智力到創(chuàng)造性思維的路徑系數均顯著；轉換能力到創(chuàng)造性思維的數量方面(流暢變通性)的路徑系數顯著；而流體智力到創(chuàng)造性思維的質量方面(獨創(chuàng)性)的路徑系數顯著。在轉換能力與創(chuàng)造性思維的關系中,流體智力的中介效應顯著,但調節(jié)效應不顯著�；谏鲜鲅芯拷Y果,得出以下研究結論：轉換能力在創(chuàng)造性思維中有著積極的作用,創(chuàng)造性思維并非是去執(zhí)行控制的；在創(chuàng)造性思維過程中,轉換能力有助于被試停止從一個概念類別中產生想法,繼而轉向另一個類別,產生更多更加新穎的想法；流體智力通過影響目標制定、提供思維邏輯和調用已有的知識來影響創(chuàng)造性思維過程。 執(zhí)行功能,特別是轉換能力與創(chuàng)造性思維之間關系的研究時間還很短,今后的研究如果能確定轉換能力對創(chuàng)造力的促進作用,那么就能夠在實踐中指導教育教學。未來研究還可以進一步結合認知神經科學的研究方法,如高時間精度的事件相關電位技術和高空間精度的腦功能成像技術,采用更適合的實驗范式來研究執(zhí)行功能在創(chuàng)造性思維中所起的作用。
[Abstract]:Creativity is a kind of advanced cognitive ability which is unique to human being. It is a kind of ability to produce or produce novel and relevant work results. Executive function is a purposeful control mechanism, which can coordinate complex cognitive activities of human beings. It includes three sub-components: inhibition, transformation and memory refresh. In the traditional study of creativity, the excessive attention to divergent thinking results in the realization that creative thinking is controlled by execution and that attention is defocused. However, as a complex and advanced cognitive process, creative thinking is bound to involve executive function monitoring and planning. At the same time, as one of the controversial factors of creativity, the relationship between fluid intelligence and creative thinking has always been in dispute. Although most studies have shown that creativity and intelligence are two distinct and unrelated abilities, in recent years, with the development of research methods, such as the widespread use of latent variable analysis, Researchers began to rethink the relationship between fluid intelligence and creative thinking. Through the analysis of latent variables, the relationship between transformation and creative thinking in executive control is discussed directly, and the mediating and regulating effects of fluid intelligence on the relationship between executive function and creative thinking are also discussed. The study measured the creative thinking, conversion ability and fluid intelligence of 104 subjects. The results showed that the transition ability and the path coefficient from fluid intelligence to creative thinking were significant, and the path coefficients from the conversion ability to the quantity of creative thinking (fluency and flexibility) were significant. The path coefficient from fluid intelligence to creative thinking quality (originality) is significant. In the relationship between transformation ability and creative thinking, the mediating effect of fluid intelligence is significant, but the regulating effect is not significant. Based on the above research results, the following conclusions are drawn: conversion ability plays a positive role in creative thinking, creative thinking is not to carry out control, and in the process of creative thinking, The ability to convert helps participants stop generating ideas from one category and then move to another, generating more innovative ideas; fluid intelligence influences goal setting. Provide thinking logic and apply existing knowledge to influence the process of creative thinking. The research time of the relationship between executive function, especially conversion ability and creative thinking is very short. If the future research can determine the promoting effect of conversion ability on creativity, then it can guide education and teaching in practice. Future research can be further combined with cognitive neuroscience methods, such as event-related potentials with high time precision and brain function imaging with high spatial accuracy. A more suitable experimental paradigm is used to study the role of executive function in creative thinking.
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B848.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 張景煥;王亞男;初玉霞;徐希錚;;三種壓力與創(chuàng)意自我效能感對創(chuàng)造力的影響[J];心理科學;2011年04期

2 張厚粲,王曉平;瑞文標準推理測驗在我國的修訂[J];心理學報;1989年02期

3 溫忠麟,.張雷,侯杰泰,劉紅云;中介效應檢驗程序及其應用[J];心理學報;2004年05期

4 陳天勇,李德明;執(zhí)行功能可分離性及與年齡關系的潛變量分析[J];心理學報;2005年02期

5 溫忠麟,侯杰泰,張雷;調節(jié)效應與中介效應的比較和應用[J];心理學報;2005年02期

6 孫天義;肖鑫;郭春彥;;轉換加工研究回顧[J];心理科學進展;2007年05期

，

本文編號：1834091