本文選題：武警基層軍官 + 職業(yè)人格��； 參考：《湖南師范大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:(1)根據(jù)構想的武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格理論模型,編制武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格問卷,并檢驗其信效度。(2)運用編制問卷研究武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格與其工作績效的關系。方法:首先采用文獻法、開放式問卷調(diào)查法、職務分析法、訪談法建構武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格理論模型,根據(jù)模型編制武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格初測問卷,然后通過項目分析和探索性因素分析,形成正式問卷,最后通過驗證性因素分析和相關分析考察問卷的信效度。基層軍官樣本分兩次施測,問卷初測樣本軍官451名,正式施測樣本軍官443名,正式施測時選取200名軍官同時完成MBTI和工作績效量表。結果:(1)武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格問卷由42個項目組成,包含7個一階因子和2個二階因子,一階因子為:F1:進取性,F2:領導力,F3:堅韌性,F4:服從性,F5:公平性,F6:犧牲精神,F7:親和性;二階因子為:F8:任務取向,F9:關系取向。(2)內(nèi)部一致性分析顯示,Cronbachα系數(shù)為0.79-0.96,分半信度為0.75-0.95。(3)內(nèi)部相關分析表明,一階因子、二階因子分之間的相關系數(shù)為0.38-0.84,相關均極其顯著(p0.001);所有一階因子與其相應的二階因子相關均較高,而與另一個二階因子相關均較低。(4)驗證性因子分析顯示,測驗數(shù)據(jù)與理論模型的各擬合指標均達到測量學要求。(5)問卷各因子與MBTI、工作績效量表各維度相關顯著。(6)MBTI人格類型差異研究結果表明,ESTJ型軍官職業(yè)人格因子得分顯著高于非ESTJ型軍官。(7)軍齡差異研究結果表明,一階因子進取性、領導力、堅韌性、犧牲精神、親和性得分差異顯著(p0.05-0.01),兩個二階因子得分差異顯著(p0.05-0.001)。(8)職務差異研究結果表明,一階因子得分差異顯著(p0.05-0.001),兩個二階因子得分差異顯著(p0.05-0.01)。結論:(1)問卷職業(yè)人格理論模型與探索性因子分析結果基本相符合,經(jīng)過驗證性因子分析表明,最終的問卷正式模型與數(shù)據(jù)相擬合。(2)通過考察Cronbachα系數(shù)、分半信度,表明問卷具有良好的信度指標。(3)采用文獻法、職務分析法、調(diào)查訪談法以及專家評估等方法,保證問卷具有良好的內(nèi)容效度。(4)通過考察問卷的內(nèi)部一致性、聚斂效度、區(qū)辨效度以及驗證性因子分析,表明問卷具有良好的結構效度。(5)通過計算職業(yè)人格問卷與MBTI量表、工作績效量表的相關系數(shù),比較軍官職業(yè)人格分數(shù)的MBTI人格類型、軍齡和職務差異,證明問卷具有較高的相容效度和實證效度。(6)武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格問卷能有效預測軍官的任務績效和關系績效,其中,領導力、堅韌性、進取性對任務績效的預測度較高,服從性、進取性對關系績效的預測度較高。(7)該問卷是測量武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格的理想工具,對基層軍官的選拔有一定的借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:Objective: 1) based on the theoretical model of professional personality of the basic officers of the armed police, to compile the questionnaire of the professional personality of the basic officers of the armed police, and to test its reliability and validity. 2) to study the relationship between the professional personality of the officers at the basic level of the armed police and their work performance by using the questionnaire. Methods: first of all, the theoretical model of the professional personality of the basic officers of the armed police was constructed by the methods of literature, open questionnaire, job analysis and interview, and the preliminary questionnaire of the professional personality of the basic officers of the armed police was compiled according to the model. Then the formal questionnaire is formed by item analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Finally, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire are investigated by confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis. The basic officer sample was divided into two groups. 451 officers were first tested and 443 officers were formally tested. 200 officers were selected to complete the MBTI and the work performance scale at the same time. Results: the Professional Personality questionnaire of basic military officers was composed of 42 items, including 7 first-order factors and 2 second-order factors. The first order factor was: F1: aggressive F2: leadership F3: tenacity F4: obedient F5: fairness F6: sacrifice spirit F7: affinity; The internal consistency analysis showed that the Cronbach 偽 coefficient was 0.79-0.96, and the split-half reliability was 0.75-0.95.3) Internal correlation analysis showed that the first order factor was the first order factor. The correlation coefficient between the second order factor score and the second order factor score is 0.38-0.84, the correlation is extremely significant (p 0.001), all the first-order factors have a higher correlation with the corresponding second-order factor, but the correlation with the other second-order factor is lower. All the fitting indexes of the test data and the theoretical model are up to the requirement of measurement. (5) the factors of questionnaire and MBTI, the correlation of each dimension of work performance scale, the difference of personality type of MBTI are significant. The results show that the scores of professional personality factor of ESTJ officers are obvious. The results of the study on the difference of military age between the military officers and non- officers showed that, The scores of first order factor, leadership, tenacity, sacrifice spirit and affinity were significantly different (p 0.05-0.01g), and the difference between two second-order factors was significant (p 0.05-0.001n. The first order factor score was significantly different from that of the second order factor score (p0.05-0.001), and the second order factor score was significantly different from that of the second order factor score (p0.05-0.01). Conclusion: the occupational personality theory model of the questionnaire is basically consistent with the exploratory factor analysis results. The confirmatory factor analysis shows that the final formal model fits with the data. The results show that the questionnaire has good reliability index. 3) by using the methods of literature, job analysis, interview and expert evaluation, the questionnaire has good content validity. The validity of the questionnaire and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the questionnaire had good structural validity. (5) by calculating the correlation coefficient between the occupational personality questionnaire and the MBTI scale and the job performance scale, the MBTI personality types of the officers' professional personality scores were compared. The difference between military age and position proves that the questionnaire has higher compatibility validity and empirical validity. The questionnaire can effectively predict the task performance and relationship performance of the officers, including leadership, tenacity, tenacity, etc. This questionnaire is an ideal tool for measuring the professional personality of the grass-roots officers of the armed police, and has certain reference significance for the selection of the officers at the grass-roots level.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：B848

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 方舟;;冰人的掌故[J];國際展望;1992年23期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 夏江溈;王芙蓉;蘭芬;;初級軍官職業(yè)承諾及影響因素研究[A];增強心理學服務社會的意識和功能——中國心理學會成立90周年紀念大會暨第十四屆全國心理學學術會議論文摘要集[C];2011年

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 蘭州軍區(qū)政治委員 李長才;按能打勝仗要求抓好“兩支人才”培養(yǎng)選拔[N];解放軍報;2013年

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 王芙蓉;軍官職業(yè)人格量表的編制和信效度研究[D];中南大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 譚蔚;武警基層軍官職業(yè)人格問卷的編制與應用研究[D];湖南師范大學;2016年

2 袁泉;二戰(zhàn)時期美國軍官職業(yè)教育研究[D];山東師范大學;2013年

3 閆捷;大學生軍官職業(yè)角色轉換研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學;2011年

4 王陽;某武警總隊女軍官職業(yè)發(fā)展問題及對策研究[D];大連理工大學;2014年

5 余果;美軍軍官職業(yè)品德培育研究[D];國防科學技術大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1823458