本文選題：無辜受害者 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況　； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：公正世界信念是指人們需要相信自己生活的世界是公正的,是善惡有報的。當(dāng)這種信念遭受不公正事件的威脅時,人們會通過各種策略去維護(hù)它,因?yàn)樗鼮槿藗兲峁┝艘环N安全感,使人們相信自己會被公正地對待,并對未來充滿信心。仇富現(xiàn)象是一種客觀存在的社會現(xiàn)象。有學(xué)者指出,仇富的本質(zhì)其實(shí)是仇不公,因?yàn)橹T多因素致使得人們將部分富人制造的不公與富人這個概念聯(lián)系在一起,從而產(chǎn)生了對富人概念的污名效應(yīng)。 本研究從公正世界信念的結(jié)構(gòu)、量表、功能及研究趨勢等方面對其進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)歸納,并展開了兩項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)研究,以驗(yàn)證“富”與“不公”的內(nèi)在聯(lián)系。在兩個實(shí)驗(yàn)中,被試都是閱讀文段,然后完成修訂的Stroop任務(wù)。 實(shí)驗(yàn)一的主要目的是考察無辜受害者的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況對被試公正世界信念激活狀態(tài)的影響。結(jié)果表明,當(dāng)被試面對無辜受害者的時候,無論是貧窮還是富有的,他們辨認(rèn)公正詞顏色的時間均顯著長于辨認(rèn)中性詞顏色的時間,即其公正世界信念受到了激活；但是在不同經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況組的被試,辨認(rèn)公正詞顏色的時間沒有顯著差異,即公正世界信念所受威脅程度沒有顯著差異。 實(shí)驗(yàn)二的主要目的是考察在事故責(zé)任未明時,當(dāng)事一方的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況對被試公正世界信念激活狀態(tài)的影響。結(jié)果表明,在事故責(zé)任未明時,當(dāng)材料中的當(dāng)事一方經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況很好時,被試辨認(rèn)公正詞語顏色的反應(yīng)時間顯著長于辨認(rèn)中性詞語的時間,其它情況下則沒有顯著差異,即“當(dāng)事一方的富有”這一信息激活了被試的公正世界信念。 從兩項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)中得出如下結(jié)論：不能確定無辜受害者的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況是否會對被試公正世界信念造成不同程度的威脅；但是已經(jīng)證實(shí),在事故責(zé)任未明時,當(dāng)事一方的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況會對被試公正世界信念的激活狀態(tài)產(chǎn)生不同的影響。也就是說“富”與“不公”的確存在聯(lián)系。
[Abstract]:The belief in the just world means that people need to believe that the world in which they live is just, good and evil rewarded. When this belief is threatened by injustice, it is defended by strategies that provide a sense of security and confidence that they will be treated fairly and with confidence in the future. Hatred for the rich is an objective social phenomenon. Some scholars have pointed out that the essence of hatred against the rich is actually a hatred of injustice, because many factors make people associate the injustice created by some rich people with the concept of the rich, thus having a stigma effect on the concept of the rich. In this study, the structure, scale, function and research trend of belief in the just world are systematically summarized, and two experimental studies are carried out to verify the inherent relationship between "rich" and "unfair". In both experiments, the subjects read the passage and complete the revised Stroop task. The main purpose of experiment one is to investigate the influence of the economic situation of innocent victims on the active state of belief in the fair world. The results showed that when the subjects were faced with innocent victims, whether they were poor or rich, the time of identifying the color of fair words was significantly longer than that of neutral words, that is, their belief in the just world was activated. However, there was no significant difference in the time of recognizing the color of the word of justice in the subjects with different economic conditions, that is, the degree of threat to the belief in the just world was not significantly different. The main purpose of experiment two is to investigate the influence of one party's economic condition on the active state of belief in the fair world of the subjects when the responsibility of the accident is not clear. The results showed that when the responsibility of the accident was not clear, the reaction time of identifying the color of the fair words was significantly longer than that of the neutral words, but there was no significant difference in other cases, when the financial condition of the one party in the material was good, the reaction time of identifying the color of the fair words was significantly longer than that of the neutral words. The information of "one party's wealth" activates the subjects' belief in a just world. The following conclusions were drawn from two experiments: it was not certain whether the economic situation of innocent victims would pose a different threat to the participants' belief in a just world, but it had been confirmed that when the responsibility for the accident was not clear, The economic condition of one party will have a different effect on the activation of the subjects'belief in a fair world. In other words, "rich" and "unfair" do exist.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B848

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫平;;法律過程要排除仇富情緒的干擾[J];法學(xué);2006年11期

2 張慶宇;;轉(zhuǎn)型期中國仇富心理探析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2011年13期

3 崔青青;;“仇富”現(xiàn)象的成因探析[J];全國商情(經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究);2008年21期

4 劉長江;殷曉菲;趙然;;青少年公正世界信念發(fā)展特點(diǎn)研究[J];沈陽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期

5 杜建政;祝振兵;;公正世界信念:概念、測量、及研究熱點(diǎn)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2007年02期

6 胡金生;葉春;李旭;高婷婷;;公正判斷中的“非理性”:加工特征、主要表現(xiàn)和影響因素[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年05期

7 祝振兵;張帆;;公正世界信念與心理健康關(guān)系的綜述[J];醫(yī)學(xué)與哲學(xué)(人文社會醫(yī)學(xué)版);2010年10期

8 張莉;申繼亮;;農(nóng)村留守兒童主觀幸福感與公正世界信念的關(guān)系研究[J];中國特殊教育;2011年06期

9 杜建政;祝振兵;李興琨;;大學(xué)生公正世界信念量表的初步編制[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2007年03期

10 周春燕;郭永玉;;公正世界信念——重建公正的雙刃劍[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年01期

，

本文編號：1784419