維—漢雙語(yǔ)者的優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向?qū)魏鲆暤挠绊?/H1>
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-20 23:41
本文選題：偽忽視 + 優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向�。� 參考：《新疆師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】：偽忽視(pseudoneglect)是指健康個(gè)體在空間注意上所存在的輕微左偏現(xiàn)象。常用線段平分任務(wù)和灰度標(biāo)尺任務(wù)來(lái)研究[18],其中閱讀方向?qū)魏鲆暤挠绊懘嬖诘臓?zhēng)論最多。研究者一致認(rèn)為從左往右的閱讀者存在左偏現(xiàn)象,而從右往左的閱讀者出現(xiàn)三種結(jié)果:(1)出現(xiàn)右偏;(2)出現(xiàn)左偏現(xiàn)象;(3)沒(méi)有偏向。本研究在此基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行完善并進(jìn)一步研究偽忽視現(xiàn)象。本研究使用加拿大SR公司生產(chǎn)的Eyelink-2000型眼動(dòng)儀,以母語(yǔ)為維吾爾語(yǔ)的維-漢雙語(yǔ)大學(xué)生為被試,采用線條平分任務(wù)和場(chǎng)景圖片任務(wù),分別設(shè)計(jì)了四個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)來(lái)研究。實(shí)驗(yàn)一:研究維-漢雙語(yǔ)者優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向與語(yǔ)言經(jīng)歷和水平之間的關(guān)系。結(jié)果表明優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從右往左的百分率與中文經(jīng)歷和英語(yǔ)經(jīng)歷有顯著得負(fù)高相關(guān)。且從右往左優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的百分率與中文水平呈負(fù)的中等相關(guān)、與英文水平呈負(fù)的低相關(guān)。從右往左優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的百分率與維吾爾語(yǔ)水平、維吾爾語(yǔ)經(jīng)歷呈負(fù)低相關(guān)。實(shí)驗(yàn)二:研究維-漢雙語(yǔ)者優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向在線條平分任務(wù)上對(duì)偽忽視的影響以及線條平分任務(wù)中線條的長(zhǎng)度、位置對(duì)偽忽視的影響。結(jié)果表明優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從左往右的被試在線條平分任務(wù)上偏向左側(cè),優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從右往左的被試在線條平分任務(wù)上向右偏。優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從右往左的被試出現(xiàn)了線條的位置效應(yīng)。而從左往右優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試在當(dāng)線條在屏幕的左側(cè)時(shí)左偏程度最小。線條在屏幕的中心和右側(cè)時(shí)偏差程度沒(méi)有顯著的變化。兩種優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試均不存在線條的長(zhǎng)度效應(yīng)。實(shí)驗(yàn)三:研究維-漢雙語(yǔ)者的優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向?qū)魏鲆曉趫?chǎng)景知覺(jué)上的影響,結(jié)果表明不同優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試首次掃描均從圖片的右側(cè)開(kāi)始掃描。隨后的掃描會(huì)出現(xiàn)隨窗口的變化而變化。在總的掃描次數(shù)上,不同優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試對(duì)圖片左側(cè)有不同頻率的掃描,但均對(duì)圖片右側(cè)的掃描多于圖片左側(cè)。實(shí)驗(yàn)四:偽忽視是否可以移動(dòng)窗口的設(shè)置來(lái)改變,通過(guò)再次對(duì)線條平分來(lái)檢驗(yàn)改變的效果;偽忽視可以通過(guò)移動(dòng)窗口的不對(duì)稱設(shè)計(jì)進(jìn)行改變,但改變的效果沒(méi)有達(dá)到顯著差異。在本實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)下得出以下結(jié)論:(1)不同閱讀方向的語(yǔ)言文字接觸頻率和語(yǔ)言水平均會(huì)影響優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的形成。(2)優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向會(huì)影響偽忽視現(xiàn)象,即優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從左往右的被試會(huì)出現(xiàn)左偏,而從右往左的被試會(huì)出現(xiàn)右偏。線條位置會(huì)影響偽忽視,主要表現(xiàn)在優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從右往左的被試中,但線條長(zhǎng)度不影響偽忽視。(3)不同優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試均從圖片的右側(cè)開(kāi)始掃描。在總的掃描次數(shù)上,不同優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試對(duì)圖片左側(cè)有不同頻率的掃描,但均對(duì)圖片右側(cè)的掃描多于圖片左側(cè)。(4)設(shè)置不對(duì)稱窗口可以改變偽忽視,左右設(shè)置窗口分別對(duì)被試的左右偏有顯著的加強(qiáng),但左設(shè)置窗口對(duì)被試的右偏及右設(shè)置窗口對(duì)被試左偏的改變沒(méi)有達(dá)到顯著效果。
[Abstract]:Pseudoneglect is a slight left-leaning phenomenon in spatial attention of healthy individuals. Line segment task and gray scale task are commonly used to study [18], in which the effect of reading direction on pseudo-neglect is the most controversial. The researchers agree that the readers from left to right have left deviations, while readers from right to left have three results: 1) and 2) the phenomenon of left deviation. This study is based on the improvement and further study of the phenomenon of pseudo-neglect. In this study, four experiments were designed using Eyelink-2000 eye movement instrument produced by SR Company of Canada, Uygur native language Uygur bilingual Uygur students as subjects, line division task and scene picture task. Experiment 1: to study the relationship between the dominant browsing direction and language experience and level of Uighur-Chinese bilinguals. The results showed that the percentage of dominant browsing direction from right to left was significantly negatively correlated with Chinese and English experience. The percentage of dominant browse direction from right to left is negatively correlated with Chinese level and low with English level. The percentage of dominant browsing direction from right to left was negatively correlated with Uygur language level. Experiment 2: the influence of dominant browsing direction of Uighur-Chinese bilinguals on pseudo-neglect in line partition task and the influence of line length and position on pseudo-neglect were studied. The results showed that the dominant browsing direction from left to right tilted to the left on the line equal task, and the dominant browsing direction from right to left shifted to the right on the line equal task. The dominant browse direction from right to left subjects appeared line position effect. The subjects with dominant left-to-right browsing direction had the least left deviation when the lines were on the left side of the screen. There is no significant change in the deviation between the center and right side of the screen. There was no line length effect in the two dominant browsing directions. Experiment 3: the effect of the dominant browsing direction of Uighur-Chinese bilinguals on the perception of pseudo-neglect was studied. The results showed that the subjects with different dominant browsing directions were scanned from the right side of the picture for the first time. Subsequent scans will vary with the window. In the total scanning times, the subjects with different dominant browsing directions scanned the left side of the picture at different frequencies, but they scanned more on the right side of the picture than on the left side of the picture. Experiment 4: whether pseudo-neglect can change the setting of moving window, and test the effect of change by dividing the lines equally again; pseudo-neglect can be changed by the asymmetric design of moving window, but the effect of change has not reached significant difference. In this experimental design, the following conclusions are drawn: 1) the frequency of language contact and language proficiency in different reading directions will affect the formation of dominant browsing direction. That is, the dominant browsing direction from left to right will appear left deviation, and from right to left participants will appear right deviation. Line position affects pseudo-neglect, mainly in the subjects whose dominant browsing direction is from right to left, but line length does not affect pseudo-neglect. 3) all the subjects with different dominant browsing directions scan from the right side of the picture. In the total scanning times, the subjects with different dominant browsing directions had different frequency of scanning on the left side of the picture, but they all had more scanning on the right side of the picture than on the left side of the picture. 4) setting an asymmetrical window could change the pseudo-neglect. The left and right setting windows significantly strengthened the left and right deviations of the subjects, but the changes of the left and right setting windows to the left deviations of the subjects were not significant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 謝枝龍;;雙語(yǔ)水平與認(rèn)知控制心智轉(zhuǎn)換[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2014年05期
，
本文編號(hào)：1780005
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1780005.html
本文選題：偽忽視 + 優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向�。� 參考：《新疆師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】：偽忽視(pseudoneglect)是指健康個(gè)體在空間注意上所存在的輕微左偏現(xiàn)象。常用線段平分任務(wù)和灰度標(biāo)尺任務(wù)來(lái)研究[18],其中閱讀方向?qū)魏鲆暤挠绊懘嬖诘臓?zhēng)論最多。研究者一致認(rèn)為從左往右的閱讀者存在左偏現(xiàn)象,而從右往左的閱讀者出現(xiàn)三種結(jié)果:(1)出現(xiàn)右偏;(2)出現(xiàn)左偏現(xiàn)象;(3)沒(méi)有偏向。本研究在此基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行完善并進(jìn)一步研究偽忽視現(xiàn)象。本研究使用加拿大SR公司生產(chǎn)的Eyelink-2000型眼動(dòng)儀,以母語(yǔ)為維吾爾語(yǔ)的維-漢雙語(yǔ)大學(xué)生為被試,采用線條平分任務(wù)和場(chǎng)景圖片任務(wù),分別設(shè)計(jì)了四個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)來(lái)研究。實(shí)驗(yàn)一:研究維-漢雙語(yǔ)者優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向與語(yǔ)言經(jīng)歷和水平之間的關(guān)系。結(jié)果表明優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從右往左的百分率與中文經(jīng)歷和英語(yǔ)經(jīng)歷有顯著得負(fù)高相關(guān)。且從右往左優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的百分率與中文水平呈負(fù)的中等相關(guān)、與英文水平呈負(fù)的低相關(guān)。從右往左優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的百分率與維吾爾語(yǔ)水平、維吾爾語(yǔ)經(jīng)歷呈負(fù)低相關(guān)。實(shí)驗(yàn)二:研究維-漢雙語(yǔ)者優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向在線條平分任務(wù)上對(duì)偽忽視的影響以及線條平分任務(wù)中線條的長(zhǎng)度、位置對(duì)偽忽視的影響。結(jié)果表明優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從左往右的被試在線條平分任務(wù)上偏向左側(cè),優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從右往左的被試在線條平分任務(wù)上向右偏。優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從右往左的被試出現(xiàn)了線條的位置效應(yīng)。而從左往右優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試在當(dāng)線條在屏幕的左側(cè)時(shí)左偏程度最小。線條在屏幕的中心和右側(cè)時(shí)偏差程度沒(méi)有顯著的變化。兩種優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試均不存在線條的長(zhǎng)度效應(yīng)。實(shí)驗(yàn)三:研究維-漢雙語(yǔ)者的優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向?qū)魏鲆曉趫?chǎng)景知覺(jué)上的影響,結(jié)果表明不同優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試首次掃描均從圖片的右側(cè)開(kāi)始掃描。隨后的掃描會(huì)出現(xiàn)隨窗口的變化而變化。在總的掃描次數(shù)上,不同優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試對(duì)圖片左側(cè)有不同頻率的掃描,但均對(duì)圖片右側(cè)的掃描多于圖片左側(cè)。實(shí)驗(yàn)四:偽忽視是否可以移動(dòng)窗口的設(shè)置來(lái)改變,通過(guò)再次對(duì)線條平分來(lái)檢驗(yàn)改變的效果;偽忽視可以通過(guò)移動(dòng)窗口的不對(duì)稱設(shè)計(jì)進(jìn)行改變,但改變的效果沒(méi)有達(dá)到顯著差異。在本實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)下得出以下結(jié)論:(1)不同閱讀方向的語(yǔ)言文字接觸頻率和語(yǔ)言水平均會(huì)影響優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的形成。(2)優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向會(huì)影響偽忽視現(xiàn)象,即優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從左往右的被試會(huì)出現(xiàn)左偏,而從右往左的被試會(huì)出現(xiàn)右偏。線條位置會(huì)影響偽忽視,主要表現(xiàn)在優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向從右往左的被試中,但線條長(zhǎng)度不影響偽忽視。(3)不同優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試均從圖片的右側(cè)開(kāi)始掃描。在總的掃描次數(shù)上,不同優(yōu)勢(shì)瀏覽方向的被試對(duì)圖片左側(cè)有不同頻率的掃描,但均對(duì)圖片右側(cè)的掃描多于圖片左側(cè)。(4)設(shè)置不對(duì)稱窗口可以改變偽忽視,左右設(shè)置窗口分別對(duì)被試的左右偏有顯著的加強(qiáng),但左設(shè)置窗口對(duì)被試的右偏及右設(shè)置窗口對(duì)被試左偏的改變沒(méi)有達(dá)到顯著效果。
[Abstract]:Pseudoneglect is a slight left-leaning phenomenon in spatial attention of healthy individuals. Line segment task and gray scale task are commonly used to study [18], in which the effect of reading direction on pseudo-neglect is the most controversial. The researchers agree that the readers from left to right have left deviations, while readers from right to left have three results: 1) and 2) the phenomenon of left deviation. This study is based on the improvement and further study of the phenomenon of pseudo-neglect. In this study, four experiments were designed using Eyelink-2000 eye movement instrument produced by SR Company of Canada, Uygur native language Uygur bilingual Uygur students as subjects, line division task and scene picture task. Experiment 1: to study the relationship between the dominant browsing direction and language experience and level of Uighur-Chinese bilinguals. The results showed that the percentage of dominant browsing direction from right to left was significantly negatively correlated with Chinese and English experience. The percentage of dominant browse direction from right to left is negatively correlated with Chinese level and low with English level. The percentage of dominant browsing direction from right to left was negatively correlated with Uygur language level. Experiment 2: the influence of dominant browsing direction of Uighur-Chinese bilinguals on pseudo-neglect in line partition task and the influence of line length and position on pseudo-neglect were studied. The results showed that the dominant browsing direction from left to right tilted to the left on the line equal task, and the dominant browsing direction from right to left shifted to the right on the line equal task. The dominant browse direction from right to left subjects appeared line position effect. The subjects with dominant left-to-right browsing direction had the least left deviation when the lines were on the left side of the screen. There is no significant change in the deviation between the center and right side of the screen. There was no line length effect in the two dominant browsing directions. Experiment 3: the effect of the dominant browsing direction of Uighur-Chinese bilinguals on the perception of pseudo-neglect was studied. The results showed that the subjects with different dominant browsing directions were scanned from the right side of the picture for the first time. Subsequent scans will vary with the window. In the total scanning times, the subjects with different dominant browsing directions scanned the left side of the picture at different frequencies, but they scanned more on the right side of the picture than on the left side of the picture. Experiment 4: whether pseudo-neglect can change the setting of moving window, and test the effect of change by dividing the lines equally again; pseudo-neglect can be changed by the asymmetric design of moving window, but the effect of change has not reached significant difference. In this experimental design, the following conclusions are drawn: 1) the frequency of language contact and language proficiency in different reading directions will affect the formation of dominant browsing direction. That is, the dominant browsing direction from left to right will appear left deviation, and from right to left participants will appear right deviation. Line position affects pseudo-neglect, mainly in the subjects whose dominant browsing direction is from right to left, but line length does not affect pseudo-neglect. 3) all the subjects with different dominant browsing directions scan from the right side of the picture. In the total scanning times, the subjects with different dominant browsing directions had different frequency of scanning on the left side of the picture, but they all had more scanning on the right side of the picture than on the left side of the picture. 4) setting an asymmetrical window could change the pseudo-neglect. The left and right setting windows significantly strengthened the left and right deviations of the subjects, but the changes of the left and right setting windows to the left deviations of the subjects were not significant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 謝枝龍;;雙語(yǔ)水平與認(rèn)知控制心智轉(zhuǎn)換[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2014年05期
，本文編號(hào)：1780005
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1780005.html
最近更新
教材專著
