本文選題：定向-對(duì)象匹配效應(yīng) + 調(diào)節(jié)性匹配�。� 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著心理學(xué)家在動(dòng)機(jī)領(lǐng)域的研究不斷深入,單純依賴經(jīng)典的享樂(lè)原則(Hedonic Principle)已無(wú)法為不同個(gè)體在不同情境中的動(dòng)機(jī)傾向提供全面、準(zhǔn)確的剖析與闡釋。所謂“趨利避害”的本能亦不足以概括人們多變的決策行為。基于趨避動(dòng)機(jī)下的理性權(quán)衡以及期望-價(jià)值關(guān)系等相關(guān)問(wèn)題的研究,Higgins先后提出的調(diào)節(jié)定向理論(Regulatory Focus Theory)和調(diào)節(jié)匹配理論(Regulatory Fit Theory)為進(jìn)一步揭示個(gè)體動(dòng)機(jī)與決策間的關(guān)系及規(guī)律開辟了新的方向。本研究嘗試從動(dòng)機(jī)定向與調(diào)節(jié)性匹配的視角出發(fā),通過(guò)對(duì)個(gè)體決策行為的分析,進(jìn)一步探究影響決策者解釋水平的兩個(gè)因素:決策對(duì)象和情感狀態(tài)。實(shí)驗(yàn)一中首次提出定向-對(duì)象匹配效應(yīng)(Focus-Target Fit Effect)的構(gòu)想,將動(dòng)機(jī)定向與決策對(duì)象的不同組合形式視為共同決定解釋水平的一對(duì)要素進(jìn)行考察,提出處于定向-對(duì)象匹配狀態(tài)的決策者具有相對(duì)較低的解釋水平,而處于非匹配狀態(tài)的決策者的解釋水平則相對(duì)較高。實(shí)驗(yàn)二納入對(duì)情感因素的考量,檢驗(yàn)定向-對(duì)象匹配效應(yīng)在不同情感狀態(tài)下對(duì)自我決策和他人決策中的解釋水平的影響效力。實(shí)驗(yàn)三聚焦決策者自身的情感狀態(tài),對(duì)定向-對(duì)象匹配效應(yīng)與情感因素對(duì)自我決策的解釋水平的影響作用展開進(jìn)一步比較。本研究通過(guò)三個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn),得出以下結(jié)論及推論:(1)決策者的調(diào)節(jié)定向與其決策對(duì)象之間的確存在某種匹配關(guān)系,即“定向-對(duì)象匹配效應(yīng)”。該效應(yīng)對(duì)決策行為的影響具體反映于決策者的解釋水平——處于定向-對(duì)象匹配狀態(tài)(如防御型定向-自我決策、促進(jìn)型定向-他人決策)的決策者傾向于在信息加工過(guò)程中,采用相對(duì)較低的解釋水平;而處于定向-對(duì)象非匹配狀態(tài)(防御型定向-他人決策、促進(jìn)型定向-自我決策)的決策者所采用的解釋水平則相對(duì)較高。(2)當(dāng)定向-對(duì)象匹配效應(yīng)與情感狀態(tài)因素共同作用于決策主體的解釋水平時(shí),后者效用更強(qiáng),甚至出現(xiàn)了對(duì)前者的掩蓋現(xiàn)象——無(wú)論決策者的定向-對(duì)象狀態(tài)匹配與否,受到豐富的情感狀態(tài)的影響,決策者在信息加工過(guò)程中的解釋水平普遍升高;而在貧乏的情感狀態(tài)下,決策者的解釋水平將相對(duì)有所降低。(3)不同的情感狀態(tài)啟動(dòng)路徑,將導(dǎo)致情感狀態(tài)對(duì)定向-對(duì)象匹配效應(yīng)以及決策者的解釋水平產(chǎn)生截然不同的影響效果(4)在完成決策任務(wù)的過(guò)程中,情感狀態(tài)的啟動(dòng)路徑與決策事件是否直接相關(guān),在一定程度上決定了其對(duì)決策者解釋水平的影響程度。
[Abstract]:With the deepening research of psychologists in the field of motivation, relying solely on the classical hedonic principle (Hedonic principle) has not been able to provide a comprehensive and accurate analysis and explanation for the motivational tendencies of different individuals in different situations.The instinct of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages is not enough to generalize people's changeable decision-making behavior.Research on rational tradeoff and expectation-value relation based on the motivation of avoidance; the regulatory Focus theory and the regulatory matching theory put forward by Higgins in order to further reveal the relationship between individual motivation and decision-makingThe system and rules have opened up a new direction.From the perspective of motivation orientation and accommodative matching, this study attempts to further explore two factors that affect the level of decision makers' interpretation: decision object and emotional state through the analysis of individual decision-making behavior.In the first experiment, the idea of Focus-Target Fit effect is put forward for the first time. The different combination forms of motivation orientation and decision object are considered as a pair of factors which jointly determine the level of interpretation.It is proposed that the decision-makers in the direction-object matching state have a relatively low level of interpretation, while those in the mismatched state have a relatively high level of interpretation.The second experiment takes into account the affective factors to test the effect of direction-object matching effect on the level of interpretation of self-decision and decision-making of others in different emotional states.The third experiment focuses on the emotional state of the decision-maker and further compares the effects of direction-object matching effect and affective factors on the level of self-decision interpretation.Through three experiments, we draw the following conclusion and corollary: 1) there is a certain matching relationship between the decision maker's adjusting orientation and his decision object, that is, "direction-object matching effect".The effect of this effect on decision-making behavior is reflected in the decision makers' level of interpretation-in the state of direction-object matching (such as defensive orientation-self-decision, promotive orientation-others decision-making), which tend to be in the process of information processing.Using a relatively low level of interpretation; in a direction-object mismatch state (defensive orientation-others decision,The decision makers of promotive orientation-self-decision) used a relatively high level of interpretation. (2) when the combination of orientation-object matching effect and emotional state factors acted on the interpretation level of decision-makers, the latter was more effective.Even the masked phenomenon of the former, no matter whether the decision-maker 's direction-object state matches or not, is influenced by the rich emotional state, and the interpretation level of the decision-maker in the process of information processing is generally increased.However, in the poor emotional state, the level of explanation of the decision maker will be relatively lower.The emotional state will have a different effect on the direction-object matching effect and the decisionmaker's interpretation level. 4) in the process of completing the decision task, whether the starting path of the emotional state is directly related to the decision event,To a certain extent, it determines the degree of its impact on the level of interpretation of decision makers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王懷勇;劉永芳;;決策過(guò)程中的調(diào)節(jié)匹配效應(yīng)及其機(jī)制[J];心理科學(xué);2014年01期

2 李艾麗莎;張慶林;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策中的情感因素[J];中國(guó)臨床康復(fù);2006年42期

，

本文編號(hào)：1770658