本文選題：社會(huì)排斥 + 死亡凸顯�。� 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：社會(huì)上反社會(huì)行為頻繁發(fā)生,回顧以往研究發(fā)現(xiàn)大多數(shù)反社會(huì)行為是因社會(huì)排斥而產(chǎn)生,而社會(huì)排斥本身無論是來自社會(huì)還是來自他人,都很難做到從源頭上避免,因此,探究如何減少社會(huì)排斥情境下的反社會(huì)行為顯得尤為重要。但縱觀研究,目前很少有研究把死亡凸顯與反社會(huì)行為相聯(lián)系,尚無研究探究在社會(huì)排斥情境下死亡凸顯對反社會(huì)行為的影響。本研究旨在探究在社會(huì)排斥情境下,死亡凸顯對反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好的影響,主要考察死亡凸顯的作用。本文一共包括三個(gè)主要實(shí)驗(yàn),實(shí)驗(yàn)一擬通過操縱被試的社會(huì)排斥,并測量二選一博弈框架來研究被試的反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好。實(shí)驗(yàn)二擬通過操縱被試的死亡凸顯,并測量二選一博弈框架來研究被試的反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好。實(shí)驗(yàn)三擬通過操縱被試的社會(huì)排斥和死亡凸顯并測量二選一博弈框架來研究社會(huì)排斥情境下死亡凸顯對被試反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好的影響。研究得到以下結(jié)論:(1)實(shí)驗(yàn)一驗(yàn)證了社會(huì)排斥對反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好的影響,即社會(huì)排斥對反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好具有顯著正向影響,相比于非社會(huì)排斥組被試,社會(huì)排斥組被試更容易進(jìn)行反社會(huì)行為選擇;(2)實(shí)驗(yàn)二探究了死亡凸顯對反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好的影響,即與非死亡凸顯組被試相比,死亡凸顯組被試更少進(jìn)行反社會(huì)行為博弈選擇;(3)實(shí)驗(yàn)三探究了在社會(huì)排斥情境下,死亡凸顯對反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好的影響,與社會(huì)排斥情境下無死亡凸顯相比,死亡凸顯明顯削弱了社會(huì)排斥對反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好的影響。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn),社會(huì)排斥可以顯著影響反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好,即受到社會(huì)排斥的被試更容易做出反社會(huì)行為選擇,而加入死亡凸顯后,反社會(huì)行為選擇明顯減少。回顧以往研究,多從社會(huì)排斥角度研究反社會(huì)行為,但在社會(huì)排斥情境下,引入死亡凸顯來進(jìn)行反社會(huì)行為研究的相對較少。社會(huì)排斥難以避免,而反社會(huì)行為卻急需解決,若引入死亡凸顯,讓人們在無意識(shí)中對死亡進(jìn)行思考,從而降低反社會(huì)行為的幾率未嘗不是一件好事。本研究基于現(xiàn)實(shí)出發(fā),探究在社會(huì)排斥情境下,死亡凸顯對反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好的影響。不僅論證了社會(huì)排斥、死亡凸顯、反社會(huì)行為博弈三個(gè)變量之間的關(guān)系,還為反社會(huì)行為的研究提供了更多的實(shí)驗(yàn)支持,豐富了以往的研究,并為反社會(huì)行為的解決與補(bǔ)救提供了新思路。
[Abstract]:Antisocial behavior occurs frequently in society. Reviewing previous studies, it is found that most antisocial behaviors occur as a result of social exclusion, and social exclusion itself is difficult to avoid at its source, either from society or from others.It is very important to explore how to reduce the anti-social behavior in the situation of social exclusion.However, there are few studies on the relationship between death salience and antisocial behavior, and there is no research on the influence of death highlight on antisocial behavior in the social exclusion situation.The purpose of this study is to explore the influence of death highlight on antisocial behavior game preference under the social exclusion situation.There are three main experiments in this paper. Experiment one is to study the preference of antisocial behavior game by manipulating the social exclusion of the subjects and measuring a game framework from two out of the two.In the second experiment, the death salience of the subjects was manipulated, and the antisocial behavior game preference of the subjects was studied by choosing a game framework from two out of the two.By manipulating the social exclusion and death salience of the subjects and measuring the influence of death salience on the antisocial behavior game preference of the participants in the social exclusion situation, the third experiment was designed to measure the two game frameworks to study the influence of death salience on the antisocial behavior game preference of the participants.The following conclusions are obtained: 1) experiment 1 verifies the influence of social exclusion on antisocial behavior game preference, that is, social exclusion has a significant positive effect on antisocial behavior game preference, compared with non-social exclusion group.The second experiment explored the influence of death highlight on the preference of antisocial behavior game, that is, compared with the non-death salient group.Death highlight group less antisocial behavior game selection 3) the third study explored the impact of death highlight on antisocial behavior game preference under the social exclusion situation, compared with no death highlight in social exclusion situation. 3. The third experiment explored the influence of death highlight on antisocial behavior game preference in the social exclusion situation, compared with no death highlight in the social exclusion situation.Death highlights significantly weaken the influence of social exclusion on antisocial behavior game preference.This study found that social exclusion can significantly affect the preference of antisocial behavior game, that is, subjects who are subject to social exclusion are more likely to make antisocial behavior choices, but after death highlights, the choice of antisocial behavior significantly decreases.In retrospect, antisocial behaviors are mostly studied from the perspective of social exclusion, but in the context of social exclusion, relatively few studies are carried out by introducing death salience to study antisocial behaviors.Social exclusion is hard to avoid, but antisocial behavior needs to be solved urgently. It is not a bad thing to introduce death highlight to make people think about death in the unconscious, thus reducing the probability of antisocial behavior.Based on reality, this study explores the influence of death on antisocial behavior game preference in the context of social exclusion.It not only demonstrates the relationship among the three variables of social exclusion, death highlight and antisocial behavior game, but also provides more experimental support for the study of antisocial behavior, and enriches the previous research.It also provides a new idea for the solution and remedy of anti-social behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B848

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陳欣;葉浩生;;行為博弈視野下信任研究的回顧[J];心理科學(xué);2009年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 肖芳;周方召;;存在監(jiān)管的司法尋租行為博弈分析[A];2005年中國法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)論壇會(huì)議論文集[C];2005年

2 余競;李竹渝;魯萬波;H.Hennig-Schmidt;;議價(jià)行為博弈中的不確定性因素最后通牒式談判的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[A];加入WTO和中國科技與可持續(xù)發(fā)展——挑戰(zhàn)與機(jī)遇、責(zé)任和對策（上冊）[C];2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 苑馨竹;社會(huì)排斥情境下死亡凸顯對反社會(huì)行為博弈偏好的影響[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年

2 林李亞;投資期權(quán)的行為博弈分析[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

3 丁榮;城市房屋征收補(bǔ)償?shù)男袨椴┺姆治鯷D];中南大學(xué);2012年

4 陸媛媛;高校新校區(qū)建設(shè)貸款行為博弈分析[D];西南交通大學(xué);2005年

5 范雪蓮;從行為博弈視角探討幾個(gè)經(jīng)典博弈模型的改進(jìn)[D];云南大學(xué);2012年

6 陳云燕;轉(zhuǎn)軌時(shí)期我國征納行為博弈分析[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1764772