本文選題：程序公正判斷 + 信息不確定性��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來研究發(fā)現(xiàn)個(gè)體不僅基于程序本身的特征進(jìn)行程序公正判斷,個(gè)體還基于提取程序相關(guān)公正或不公正信息時(shí)的困難或容易的感覺,即提取容易性進(jìn)行程序公正判斷。那么,個(gè)體何時(shí)基于何種信息源進(jìn)行程序公正判斷?目前引起研究者廣泛關(guān)注的調(diào)節(jié)變量是不確定性。兩類較受研究者關(guān)注的不確定性是自我不確定性與信息不確定性,現(xiàn)有研究大部分關(guān)注自我不確定性對個(gè)體基于提取容易性進(jìn)行程序公正判斷的影響,而少有研究關(guān)注信息不確定性的這一調(diào)節(jié)作用。本研究通過實(shí)驗(yàn)(實(shí)驗(yàn)1)探討信息不確定性對個(gè)體基于提取容易性形成程序公正判斷的影響。在此基礎(chǔ)上,研究通過實(shí)驗(yàn)(實(shí)驗(yàn)2、3)深入探討當(dāng)自我不確定性與信息不確定性同時(shí)存在時(shí),對個(gè)體形成程序公正判斷的信息源的影響。 實(shí)驗(yàn)1以80名本科生為被試進(jìn)行2(程序：內(nèi)隱無發(fā)言權(quán)程序VS.外顯無發(fā)言權(quán)程序×2(回憶不公正信息量：少VS.多)組間實(shí)驗(yàn)。方差分析結(jié)果表明,程序與回憶不公正信息量交互作用顯著,即信息不確定性是個(gè)體基于提取容易性進(jìn)行程序公正判斷的調(diào)節(jié)變量。具體來講,在外顯無發(fā)言權(quán)(信息確定性)條件下,與回憶更多不公正的被試相比,回憶更少不公正的被試認(rèn)為程序更加公正,這體現(xiàn)基于內(nèi)容信息的程序公正判斷；相反,在內(nèi)隱無發(fā)言權(quán)(信息不確定性)條件下,與回憶更多不公正的被試相比,回憶更少不公正的被試認(rèn)為程序更加不公正,這體現(xiàn)基于提取容易性的程序公正判斷； 實(shí)驗(yàn)2以144名本科生為被試進(jìn)行2(程序：內(nèi)隱無發(fā)言權(quán)VS.外顯無發(fā)言權(quán))×2(狀態(tài)自我不確定性：自我確定性VS.自我不確定性)×2(回憶不公正信息量：少VS.多)組間實(shí)驗(yàn)。方差分析結(jié)果表明,程序、狀態(tài)自我不確定性與回憶不公正信息量三項(xiàng)交互作用顯著。結(jié)果表明,在外顯無發(fā)言權(quán)程序下,具有自我不確定性的被試在提取更少不公正后認(rèn)為程序更加公正,這表明了基于內(nèi)容信息進(jìn)行程序公正判斷；相反,具有自我確定性的被試在提取更少不公正時(shí)認(rèn)為程序更加不公正,這表明了提取容易性效應(yīng)。即自我不確定性與信息不確定性相交互后影響個(gè)體基于提取容易性的判斷。這一結(jié)果表明自我不確定性與信息不確定性相交互的效應(yīng)與信息不確定性或自我不確定性單獨(dú)起作用的效應(yīng)有不同； 實(shí)驗(yàn)3以147名本科生為被試進(jìn)行2(程序：內(nèi)隱無發(fā)言權(quán)VS.外顯無發(fā)言權(quán))×2(回憶不公正信息量：少VS.多)組間實(shí)驗(yàn)。層級回歸結(jié)果表明程序、回憶不公正信息量、特質(zhì)自我不確定性三項(xiàng)交互顯著。在外顯無發(fā)言權(quán)程序下,對于特質(zhì)自我不確定性高的個(gè)體而言,在回憶更多不公正條件下與在回憶更少不公正條件下所做的程序公正判斷差異不顯著,未出現(xiàn)預(yù)期的內(nèi)容信息效應(yīng)；對特質(zhì)自我不確定性低的個(gè)體而言,在回憶更多不公正條件下與在回憶更少不公正條件下所做的程序公正判斷差異不顯著,未出現(xiàn)預(yù)期的提取容易性效應(yīng)。同樣,在內(nèi)隱無發(fā)言權(quán)程序下,回憶更多不公正的個(gè)體與回憶更少不公正的個(gè)體所做的程序公正判斷差異不顯著,未出現(xiàn)預(yù)期的提取容易性效應(yīng)。 以上研究結(jié)果與不確定性條件下的判斷與決策的相關(guān)研究結(jié)論一致,豐富了不確定管理理論、自我不確定性的研究。本文從人-情境交互視角下對實(shí)驗(yàn)2、3不一致的結(jié)果進(jìn)行討論。本文還從研究變量、研究情境和研究范式的擴(kuò)展對未來研究方向進(jìn)行展望。
[Abstract]:In recent years , it has been found that the individual is not only based on the characteristics of the program itself , but also the difficulty or the easy feeling when the individual is concerned with fair or unjust information .

The results of variance analysis show that the interaction between the program and the recall is significant , that is , the information uncertainty is the adjustment variable that the individual can judge independently on the basis of the extraction easiness .
On the contrary , under the condition of implicit no say ( information uncertainty ) , compared with those who recall more injustice , recall that the procedure is more unjust , which reflects the procedural justice judgment based on the extraction easiness ;


The results of variance analysis indicate that the procedure , state self - uncertainty and recall unjust information amount of three interactions are significant . The results show that , under the explicit non - floor procedure , the test with self - uncertainty is considered more just after the extraction of less injustice , which shows that the procedure is fair and judged based on the content information ;
The results show that the effects of self - uncertainty and information uncertainty are different from the effects of information uncertainty or self - uncertainty alone .


The results showed that there was no significant difference in the procedural fairness under the conditions of memory and memory , but the expected content information effect was not appeared .
In the case of individuals with low trait self - uncertainty , there was no significant difference in the fair judgement of the procedure under the condition of memory and less unjust , and the expected extraction ease effect did not appear . Also , in the process of implicit non - voice , there was no significant difference in the procedural justice between the more unjust individual and the individual who recalled less injustice , and the expected extraction ease effect did not occur .

The results of these studies are consistent with the conclusions of the decision - making under uncertainty conditions , which enrich the research of uncertain management theory and self - uncertainty . This paper discusses the results of the experiment 2 , 3 from the perspective of human - context interaction . The paper also looks forward to the future research direction from the research variables , the research situation and the extension of the research paradigm .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 高記;馬紅宇;;程序公正的測量及研究操縱[J];心理與行為研究;2011年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1753199