本文選題：音量大小　切入點：學習判斷　出處：《浙江師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在學習或記憶過程中,個體會對當前所學知識的掌握程度或其之后的回憶成績進行預測,即學習判斷(Judgment of learning, JOL)。依據(jù)學習判斷的結果,個體會對所學材料重新分配學習時間、選擇加工策略等,可見,學習判斷對個體的自我調(diào)節(jié)學習有至關重要的作用。有關研究表明,學習判斷受到多種不同因素的影響,如詞對之間的關聯(lián)性、練習次數(shù)或?qū)W習時間、呈現(xiàn)順序、被試情緒狀態(tài)等。最近,研究者發(fā)現(xiàn),諸如顏色、字體類型或大小等有關學習材料的知覺屬性也會影響學習判斷。但研究者在實驗中只是以單個的詞語作為學習材料,考察這些詞語的字體大小或音量大小對即時學習判斷、測驗成績的影響。受其實驗材料和實驗范式的限制,研究者對延遲學習判斷——學習判斷中的另一種重要形式?jīng)]有進行考察,亦忽略了對學習判斷與實際回憶成績的差距,即學習判斷的準確性探討。因此,立足于先前的研究,本研究以聽覺上的知覺信息為切入點,讓被試學習不同音量大小的詞對來考察該聽覺信息對個體學習判斷的影響,并進一步探討其對學習判斷產(chǎn)生影響的原因。 本研究設計兩個實驗。實驗一為兩因素混合設計,立足于前人的研究,探討音量不同對JOL值、回憶成績、JOL準確性分別在即時與延遲兩種學習判斷形式下的影響作用。實驗二在實驗一的基礎上展開,以兩種詞對的學習時間作為編碼流暢性的衡量指標,探討即時學習判斷條件下音量大小對學習判斷產(chǎn)生影響的原因。 得出如下結論： (1)音量大小會影響個體即時學習判斷條件下的JOL值和絕對準確性,大音量詞對的JOL值顯著高于小音量詞對,小音量詞對的絕對準確性要好于大音量詞對；而延遲學習判斷條件下,大音量詞對與小音量詞對在以上兩方面均未出現(xiàn)顯著差異。 (2)音量大小在固定步調(diào)學習方式下不影響回憶成績,即無論是即時JOL還是延遲JOL條件下,大音量詞對和小音量詞對的測驗成績之間差異均不顯著。 (3)音量大小會影響自定步調(diào)下的個體學習時間,大音量詞對的學習時間顯著短于小音量詞對。而學習時間是編碼流暢性的衡量指標,這表明學習判斷受音量大小的影響是因為編碼流暢性的作用。
[Abstract]:In the process of learning or memory, individuals predict the degree of mastery of what they have learned or their subsequent recall scores, that is, learning judgment of learning, JOLU.According to the result of learning judgment, the individual will redistribute the learning time and choose the processing strategy, etc. It can be seen that learning judgment plays an important role in the self-regulation of individual learning.Studies have shown that learning judgment is influenced by a variety of factors, such as the relevance of word pairs, the number of exercises or learning time, the order of presentation, the emotional state of the subjects, and so on.Recently, researchers have found that perceptual attributes of learning materials, such as color, font type or size, can also affect learning judgment.However, in the experiment, the researchers only used a single word as the learning material to investigate the effect of the font size or volume size of these words on the instant learning judgment and test results.Limited by its experimental materials and experimental paradigms, the researchers did not examine another important form of learning judgment in delayed learning judgment, and neglected the gap between learning judgment and actual recall achievement.That is, the accuracy of learning judgment.Therefore, based on the previous studies, the present study uses auditory perceptual information as a starting point to examine the effects of auditory information on individual learning judgment by learning word pairs of different volume sizes.And further explore the reasons for its influence on learning judgment.This study designed two experiments.Experiment one is a mixed design of two factors, based on previous studies, to explore the effect of different volume on the JOL value, recall scores and JOL accuracy in two forms of learning judgment: immediate and delayed.On the basis of experiment 1, the second experiment takes the learning time of two word pairs as a measure of coding fluency, and discusses the reasons why the volume size affects the learning judgment under the condition of instant learning judgment.The following conclusions are drawn:The JOL value of large volume word pair is significantly higher than that of low volume word pair, and the absolute accuracy of low volume word pair is better than that of large volume word pair.However, under the condition of delayed learning judgment, there is no significant difference between large volume word pair and small volume word pair in the above two aspects.(2) the volume level does not affect the recall scores under the fixed pace learning style, that is, under the condition of instant JOL or delayed JOL, there is no significant difference between the test scores of large volume word pairs and small volume word pairs.3) the volume level will affect the individual learning time at a self-paced rate, and the learning time of a large volume word pair is significantly shorter than that of a small volume word pair.Learning time is a measure of coding fluency, which indicates that learning judgment is influenced by volume level because of the function of coding fluency.
【學位授予單位】：浙江師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 董奇;論元認知[J];北京師范大學學報;1989年01期

2 劉耀中;元記憶的內(nèi)涵、結構及其機制[J];華東師范大學學報(教育科學版);1999年04期

3 賈寧;白學軍;沈德立;;學習判斷準確性的研究方法[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2006年03期

4 陳功香;傅小蘭;;學習判斷中的孤立效應[J];心理科學;2008年01期

5 楊蓮清;莫雷;;學習判斷孤立效應的發(fā)生機制及作用途徑[J];心理科學;2008年02期

6 陳海德;趙成斌;李偉健;;即刻學習判斷的系列位置效應:內(nèi)外部線索的影響[J];心理科學;2011年02期

7 賈寧;;延遲學習判斷研究的發(fā)展與展望[J];心理科學;2012年01期

8 張振新;徐憲斌;;情緒狀態(tài)對學習判斷的影響及其機制[J];心理科學;2012年01期

9 陳功香,傅小蘭;內(nèi)外部線索對學習判斷的影響[J];心理學報;2003年02期

10 陳功香;張承芬;蘇雅雯;;延遲學習判斷的效應機制[J];心理學報;2010年07期

，

本文編號：1725897