本文選題：直接措辭　切入點(diǎn)：反轉(zhuǎn)措辭　出處：《中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志》2017年01期

【摘要】：目的:比較UCLA-3(University of California Loneliness Scale-Version 3)和DLS(Differential Loneliness Scale)兩個(gè)孤獨(dú)量表的信效度,及直接和反轉(zhuǎn)措辭題目的心理測(cè)量學(xué)性能。為比較直接和反轉(zhuǎn)效應(yīng)提供依據(jù)。方法:對(duì)UCLA-3和DLS的題目進(jìn)行措辭方向的反轉(zhuǎn),得到直接和反轉(zhuǎn)措辭兩種版本,分別施測(cè)于高中生樣本。兩次測(cè)試結(jié)果合并后再得到原版量表的測(cè)試數(shù)據(jù)。結(jié)果:UCLA-3和DLS中直接措辭題的信效度略高于反轉(zhuǎn)措辭題,但差異不大;DLS中的直接和反轉(zhuǎn)措辭題目測(cè)量的是同一特質(zhì),題目措辭方向的改變不影響其所測(cè)的內(nèi)容,但UCLA-3中的題目就不具備這些特性;兩種措辭效應(yīng)在DLS和UCLA-3中都存在,但DLS受其影響較小。結(jié)論:DLS有更高的信效度;措辭效應(yīng)盡管影響DLS,但不嚴(yán)重;兩種措辭題目可以相加計(jì)算總分;UCLA-3受措辭效應(yīng)影響大,需要改進(jìn)。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the reliability and validity of UCLA-3(University of California Loneliness Scale-Version 3 and DLS(Differential Loneliness scale. And the psychometric performance of direct and reverse wordings. This provides a basis for comparing direct and reverse effects. Methods: direct and reverse versions of UCLA-3 and DLS topics are obtained. The results showed that the reliability and validity of the direct word-question in the 10% UCLA-3 and DLS were slightly higher than those in the reverse word-question. However, the difference between direct and reverse wordings in DLSs is the same. The change in the direction of topic wording does not affect the content measured, but the topic in UCLA-3 does not have these characteristics; both word-effects exist in DLS and UCLA-3. Conclusion: DLS has a higher reliability and validity; the wordings effect is not serious although it affects DLSs; the two wordings can be added together to calculate that the total score UCLA-3 is greatly affected by the phrasing effect and needs to be improved.
【作者單位】： 山東師范大學(xué)心理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“慈善捐助的心理誘發(fā)機(jī)制研究”(15BSH083) 教育部人文社科規(guī)劃基金項(xiàng)目“利他行為的啟動(dòng)機(jī)制和內(nèi)隱測(cè)量研究”(13YJA190006) 山東省“人類認(rèn)知與行為發(fā)展”重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室建設(shè)項(xiàng)目
【分類號(hào)】：B842.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1664438