本文選題：始成年　切入點：傾向性寬恕　出處：《河南大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在我國傳統(tǒng)文化中，以和為貴始終是中國人獨有的處事智慧，這種精神增強了人際間的親密關系，也能化解沖突與矛盾。在當前我國構建和諧社會，推動社會風氣改善的進程中，仍然有許多不和諧的現(xiàn)象發(fā)生，比如常見的“路怒族”、逐漸上升的離婚率等。如何化解這些人際矛盾，實現(xiàn)真正的“和諧”，已成為當今社會面臨的一大難題。而寬恕作為一種積極的人格特質，在應對負性情緒及人際間的矛盾時，有良好的緩解作用。寬恕是以和為貴的具體表現(xiàn)，因此對寬恕進行研究具有深刻的社會意義。 本研究采用問卷調查法，以開封、臨汾兩個城市四所學校的802名始成年個體為被試，探討同一性風格對傾向性寬恕的影響。在此基礎上，采用實驗法對不同寬恕水平被試的知覺加工特點進行探索研究。結果表明： （1）修訂的傾向性寬恕問卷包括寬恕自己、寬恕他人、寬恕處境三個維度，正式施測結果表明，問卷的結構模型擬合良好，信效度較好，可以作為測量始成年個體傾向性寬恕的研究工具； （2）傾向性寬恕的人口學特征的差異結果表明，傾向性寬恕的寬恕自己維度在性別上差異顯著；傾向性寬恕的寬恕他人和寬恕處境維度在生源地上差異顯著；傾向性寬恕總分及各維度在年級上差異不顯著；傾向性寬恕的總分和寬恕自己維度在學科上差異顯著； （3）同一性風格對傾向性寬恕的多元回歸分析結果顯示，三種同一性風格都可以顯著預測個體寬恕自己的水平；信息風格可以顯著預測個體寬恕他人的水平，，規(guī)范風格和擴散風格可以顯著預測個體寬恕處境的水平； （4）采用點探測任務和情緒stroop任務對不同寬恕水平個體的注意偏向和知覺加工偏向進行探索性研究，結果顯示：不同寬恕水平的被試對探測刺激出現(xiàn)位置的反應時不存在明顯區(qū)別，即不存在注意偏向；高寬恕水平的被試對探測刺激的反應時間比低寬恕水平被試對探測刺激的反應時間長；高寬恕水平的被試對積極詞匯產生了知覺加工偏向，低寬恕水平的被試對消極詞匯產生了知覺加工偏向。
[Abstract]:In the traditional culture of our country, it is always the unique wisdom of the Chinese to treat things with peace. This spirit strengthens the intimate relationship between people and can also resolve conflicts and contradictions. At present, we are building a harmonious society in our country. In the process of promoting the improvement of social atmosphere, there are still many discordant phenomena, such as the common "Lu Nu people", the rising divorce rate, and so on. How to resolve these interpersonal conflicts? The realization of real "harmony" has become a major problem facing the society today. Forgiveness, as a positive personality trait, plays a good role in alleviating negative emotions and interpersonal conflicts. Forgiveness is a concrete manifestation of harmony. Therefore, the study of forgiveness has profound social significance. In this study, 802 adult individuals from four schools in Kaifeng and Linfen were investigated by questionnaire to explore the influence of identity style on forgiving tendentiousness. The characteristics of perceptual processing in subjects with different forgiveness levels were investigated by experimental method. The results showed that:. 1) the revised questionnaire includes three dimensions: forgiving oneself, forgiving others and forgiving the situation. The formal test results show that the structural model of the questionnaire fits well and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire is good. It can be used as a research tool to measure the tendency of forgiveness in adults. (2) the demographic characteristics of prone forgiveness are different. The results show that the dimension of forgiving oneself is significantly different in sex, the dimension of forgiving others and forgiving situation is significant difference in the origin of the students. There was no significant difference in the total scores and dimensions of prone forgiveness in grade, and there was significant difference between the total score of prone forgiveness and the dimension of forgiveness in discipline. 3) the results of multiple regression analysis of identity style to forgiving tendentiousness showed that all three types of identity styles could significantly predict the level of individual forgiveness, while information style could significantly predict the level of individual forgiveness. Normative and diffusive styles can significantly predict the level of individual forgiveness; (4) Point detection task and emotional stroop task were used to explore the attention bias and perceptual processing bias of individuals with different forgiveness levels. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the response of subjects with different forgiveness levels to detecting the location of stimulus, that is, there was no attention bias. The response time of the subjects with high forgiveness level was longer than that of the subjects with low forgiveness level, and the subjects with high forgiveness level had a perceptual processing bias to positive words. The subjects with low forgiveness level showed perceptual processing bias to negative vocabulary.
【學位授予單位】：河南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐曉娟;;當代大學生寬恕水平狀況實證分析[J];安慶師范學院學報(社會科學版);2009年12期

2 賀小華;張建育;;大學生寬恕心理及其影響因素探析[J];贛南師范學院學報;2013年02期

3 李湘暉;;大學生寬恕與心理健康的相關分析[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2008年07期

4 吳希慶;胡仟;陳翠;;大學生的寬恕水平對憤怒表達及心理健康的影響[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2012年03期

5 傅宏;寬恕:當代心理學研究的新主題[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2002年06期

6 傅宏;寬恕心理學:理論蘊涵與發(fā)展前瞻[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2003年06期

7 熊慧素;梁紅霞;黎玉蘭;;寬恕教育:高校心理健康教育新途徑[J];蘭州教育學院學報;2013年04期

8 劉凌;馬旭穎;沈悅;;西方自我寬恕模型研究進展[J];遼寧師范大學學報(社會科學版);2013年02期

9 張紅靜;;大學生寬恕動機與情緒狀態(tài)的關系研究[J];山東師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2010年03期

10 李湘暉;;大學生寬恕現(xiàn)狀及其與心理健康的關系研究[J];現(xiàn)代預防醫(yī)學;2011年14期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 李兆良;寬恕內涵的本土心理學反思[D];吉林大學;2011年

2 陶琳瑾;高特質憤怒青少年的寬恕干預研究[D];南京師范大學;2011年

本文編號：1596114