本文選題：始成年　切入點(diǎn)：傾向性寬恕　出處：《河南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化中，以和為貴始終是中國(guó)人獨(dú)有的處事智慧，這種精神增強(qiáng)了人際間的親密關(guān)系，也能化解沖突與矛盾。在當(dāng)前我國(guó)構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)，推動(dòng)社會(huì)風(fēng)氣改善的進(jìn)程中，仍然有許多不和諧的現(xiàn)象發(fā)生，比如常見的“路怒族”、逐漸上升的離婚率等。如何化解這些人際矛盾，實(shí)現(xiàn)真正的“和諧”，已成為當(dāng)今社會(huì)面臨的一大難題。而寬恕作為一種積極的人格特質(zhì)，在應(yīng)對(duì)負(fù)性情緒及人際間的矛盾時(shí)，有良好的緩解作用。寬恕是以和為貴的具體表現(xiàn)，因此對(duì)寬恕進(jìn)行研究具有深刻的社會(huì)意義。 本研究采用問卷調(diào)查法，以開封、臨汾兩個(gè)城市四所學(xué)校的802名始成年個(gè)體為被試，探討同一性風(fēng)格對(duì)傾向性寬恕的影響。在此基礎(chǔ)上，采用實(shí)驗(yàn)法對(duì)不同寬恕水平被試的知覺加工特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行探索研究。結(jié)果表明： （1）修訂的傾向性寬恕問卷包括寬恕自己、寬恕他人、寬恕處境三個(gè)維度，正式施測(cè)結(jié)果表明，問卷的結(jié)構(gòu)模型擬合良好，信效度較好，可以作為測(cè)量始成年個(gè)體傾向性寬恕的研究工具； （2）傾向性寬恕的人口學(xué)特征的差異結(jié)果表明，傾向性寬恕的寬恕自己維度在性別上差異顯著；傾向性寬恕的寬恕他人和寬恕處境維度在生源地上差異顯著；傾向性寬恕總分及各維度在年級(jí)上差異不顯著；傾向性寬恕的總分和寬恕自己維度在學(xué)科上差異顯著； （3）同一性風(fēng)格對(duì)傾向性寬恕的多元回歸分析結(jié)果顯示，三種同一性風(fēng)格都可以顯著預(yù)測(cè)個(gè)體寬恕自己的水平；信息風(fēng)格可以顯著預(yù)測(cè)個(gè)體寬恕他人的水平，，規(guī)范風(fēng)格和擴(kuò)散風(fēng)格可以顯著預(yù)測(cè)個(gè)體寬恕處境的水平； （4）采用點(diǎn)探測(cè)任務(wù)和情緒stroop任務(wù)對(duì)不同寬恕水平個(gè)體的注意偏向和知覺加工偏向進(jìn)行探索性研究，結(jié)果顯示：不同寬恕水平的被試對(duì)探測(cè)刺激出現(xiàn)位置的反應(yīng)時(shí)不存在明顯區(qū)別，即不存在注意偏向；高寬恕水平的被試對(duì)探測(cè)刺激的反應(yīng)時(shí)間比低寬恕水平被試對(duì)探測(cè)刺激的反應(yīng)時(shí)間長(zhǎng)；高寬恕水平的被試對(duì)積極詞匯產(chǎn)生了知覺加工偏向，低寬恕水平的被試對(duì)消極詞匯產(chǎn)生了知覺加工偏向。
[Abstract]:In the traditional culture of our country, it is always the unique wisdom of the Chinese to treat things with peace. This spirit strengthens the intimate relationship between people and can also resolve conflicts and contradictions. At present, we are building a harmonious society in our country. In the process of promoting the improvement of social atmosphere, there are still many discordant phenomena, such as the common "Lu Nu people", the rising divorce rate, and so on. How to resolve these interpersonal conflicts? The realization of real "harmony" has become a major problem facing the society today. Forgiveness, as a positive personality trait, plays a good role in alleviating negative emotions and interpersonal conflicts. Forgiveness is a concrete manifestation of harmony. Therefore, the study of forgiveness has profound social significance. In this study, 802 adult individuals from four schools in Kaifeng and Linfen were investigated by questionnaire to explore the influence of identity style on forgiving tendentiousness. The characteristics of perceptual processing in subjects with different forgiveness levels were investigated by experimental method. The results showed that:. 1) the revised questionnaire includes three dimensions: forgiving oneself, forgiving others and forgiving the situation. The formal test results show that the structural model of the questionnaire fits well and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire is good. It can be used as a research tool to measure the tendency of forgiveness in adults. (2) the demographic characteristics of prone forgiveness are different. The results show that the dimension of forgiving oneself is significantly different in sex, the dimension of forgiving others and forgiving situation is significant difference in the origin of the students. There was no significant difference in the total scores and dimensions of prone forgiveness in grade, and there was significant difference between the total score of prone forgiveness and the dimension of forgiveness in discipline. 3) the results of multiple regression analysis of identity style to forgiving tendentiousness showed that all three types of identity styles could significantly predict the level of individual forgiveness, while information style could significantly predict the level of individual forgiveness. Normative and diffusive styles can significantly predict the level of individual forgiveness; (4) Point detection task and emotional stroop task were used to explore the attention bias and perceptual processing bias of individuals with different forgiveness levels. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the response of subjects with different forgiveness levels to detecting the location of stimulus, that is, there was no attention bias. The response time of the subjects with high forgiveness level was longer than that of the subjects with low forgiveness level, and the subjects with high forgiveness level had a perceptual processing bias to positive words. The subjects with low forgiveness level showed perceptual processing bias to negative vocabulary.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐曉娟;;當(dāng)代大學(xué)生寬恕水平狀況實(shí)證分析[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年12期

2 賀小華;張建育;;大學(xué)生寬恕心理及其影響因素探析[J];贛南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

3 李湘暉;;大學(xué)生寬恕與心理健康的相關(guān)分析[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2008年07期

4 吳希慶;胡仟;陳翠;;大學(xué)生的寬恕水平對(duì)憤怒表達(dá)及心理健康的影響[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2012年03期

5 傅宏;寬恕:當(dāng)代心理學(xué)研究的新主題[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年06期

6 傅宏;寬恕心理學(xué):理論蘊(yùn)涵與發(fā)展前瞻[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年06期

7 熊慧素;梁紅霞;黎玉蘭;;寬恕教育:高校心理健康教育新途徑[J];蘭州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

8 劉凌;馬旭穎;沈悅;;西方自我寬恕模型研究進(jìn)展[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

9 張紅靜;;大學(xué)生寬恕動(dòng)機(jī)與情緒狀態(tài)的關(guān)系研究[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

10 李湘暉;;大學(xué)生寬恕現(xiàn)狀及其與心理健康的關(guān)系研究[J];現(xiàn)代預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2011年14期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李兆良;寬恕內(nèi)涵的本土心理學(xué)反思[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 陶琳瑾;高特質(zhì)憤怒青少年的寬恕干預(yù)研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：1596114