本文關(guān)鍵詞： 成功老齡化 多維度健康評(píng)估 他評(píng)量表　出處：《安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：研究背景：面對(duì)越來(lái)越龐大的老齡化人群，如何實(shí)現(xiàn)成功老齡化（successfulageing,SA）成為老年健康管理的一個(gè)重要議題。文獻(xiàn)回顧發(fā)現(xiàn)，如何更加有效地評(píng)估成功老齡化尚未形成統(tǒng)一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。以往對(duì)成功老齡化的評(píng)估多是針對(duì)不同的維度指標(biāo)選取多個(gè)經(jīng)信效度校驗(yàn)過(guò)的量表或問卷，以自評(píng)的形式進(jìn)行評(píng)估。對(duì)于老年這一特殊類型的群體來(lái)說(shuō)，自評(píng)量表冗長(zhǎng)復(fù)雜，老年人的依從性較差，問卷回收有效率較低，在老年健康管理中很難操作和實(shí)施。目前，國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)于成功老齡化評(píng)估工具的研究較少，因此本研究在文獻(xiàn)回顧、借鑒老年人多維健康評(píng)估的成果和相關(guān)量表編制思路的基礎(chǔ)上，嘗試編制一套易于醫(yī)護(hù)人員操作的成功老齡化他評(píng)工具，以便早期快捷、有效地對(duì)老齡化人群做出評(píng)估，為進(jìn)一步提出針對(duì)性的干預(yù)措施提供參考依據(jù)，有望使更多的老人轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)镾A老人。 目的：本研究源于杭州市科技局項(xiàng)目（20120633B21），嘗試研制一套具有較好信、效度，易于醫(yī)護(hù)人員操作，，在老齡化人群中能粗略劃分出成功老人組與非成功老人組的成功老齡化他評(píng)量表，為開展老年健康管理提供有效的評(píng)估工具。方法：通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)分析，確定SA評(píng)價(jià)維度、結(jié)構(gòu)及評(píng)分方法。經(jīng)專家咨詢、半結(jié)構(gòu)式訪談及2次施測(cè)，形成多維度描述性SA他評(píng)量表。用預(yù)測(cè)樣本（n=50）進(jìn)行項(xiàng)目分析、評(píng)定者間信度和校標(biāo)效度檢驗(yàn)，用正式施測(cè)樣本（n=300）進(jìn)行項(xiàng)目分析、內(nèi)部一致性檢驗(yàn)、評(píng)定者間信度及效標(biāo)效度檢驗(yàn)，并分析影響成功老齡化測(cè)定的相關(guān)因素。采用日常生活能力量表（ADL）、簡(jiǎn)易精神狀態(tài)量表（MMSE）、社會(huì)功能缺陷量表（SSDS）及紐芬蘭紀(jì)念大學(xué)幸福度量表（MUNSH）作校標(biāo)。 結(jié)果：(1)SA他評(píng)量表由五個(gè)維度指標(biāo)組成：目前慢性病情況、軀體功能、認(rèn)知功能、社會(huì)功能、主觀幸福感。(2)SA相關(guān)因素分析顯示,年齡、受教育程度不同的老人在成功老齡化測(cè)定結(jié)果上有差異，差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。年齡的影響更大一些，成功老齡化隨著年齡的增長(zhǎng)而有所降低。 結(jié)論：自行編制的成功老齡化他評(píng)量表具有較好的信效度。初步分析了相關(guān)影響因素。臨床初步應(yīng)用能較好地對(duì)老年人整體健康狀況做出評(píng)估同時(shí)區(qū)分出SA組與非SA組。
[Abstract]:Background: in the face of more and more large aging population, how to achieve successful aging has become an important issue in the health management of the elderly. How to evaluate successful aging more effectively has not yet formed a unified standard. In the past, the evaluation of successful aging was mostly based on the different dimensional indicators selected multiple reliability and validity check scale or questionnaire. For a special group of elderly people, the self-rating scale is long and complicated, the compliance of the elderly is poor, the efficiency of questionnaire recovery is low, and it is difficult to operate and implement in the elderly health management. There are few researches on the assessment tools of successful aging at home and abroad. Therefore, this study is based on the review of literature, the results of multidimensional health assessment of the elderly and the relevant scales. In order to evaluate the aging population quickly and effectively in the early stage and provide reference for further targeted intervention, the author tries to develop a set of evaluation tools for successful ageing, which is easy for medical staff to operate. It is hoped that more old people will be transformed into SA elders. Objective: this study originated from the project of Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (HSCB) (20120633B21) and attempted to develop a set with good reliability, validity and easy operation by medical staff. In order to provide an effective evaluation tool for health management of the elderly, we can roughly distinguish the successful ageing scale from the non-successful group in the aging population. Methods: through literature analysis, the dimensions of SA evaluation were determined. Structure and scoring methods. Through expert consultation, semi-structured interviews and two tests, a multi-dimensional descriptive SA other rating scale was formed. The item analysis, internal consistency test, reliability test and validity test were carried out with a formal test sample. The influencing factors of successful aging were analyzed. ADL scale, MMSE scale, SSDS scale and MUNSHS were used to measure the happiness of Memorial University of Newfoundland. Results the SAS scale consisted of five dimensions: chronic disease, body function, cognitive function, social function, subjective well-being. The results of successful aging were different among the elderly with different education levels, and the difference was statistically significant. The influence of age was greater, and the successful aging decreased with the increase of age. Conclusion: the reliability and validity of the success Aging other rating scale developed by ourselves are good. The related factors are analyzed preliminarily. The clinical preliminary application can better assess the overall health status of the elderly and distinguish the SA group from the non-SA group.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B841

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 仇成軒,Bengt Winblad,Laura Fratiglioni;瑞典斯德哥爾摩市社區(qū)人群老年癡呆和阿爾茨海默病的危險(xiǎn)因素隊(duì)列研究[J];中華流行病學(xué)雜志;2005年11期

2 申遠(yuǎn),李春波,張明園,翁旭初,吳文源;成功老齡與輕度認(rèn)知功能損害老年患者腦功能磁共振成像對(duì)照研究[J];中華精神科雜志;2005年04期

3 吳文源;成功老齡的概念及其研究[J];中華醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2005年42期

4 李春波,張新凱,張明園;成功老齡的初步研究:判別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其相關(guān)因素[J];中國(guó)老年學(xué)雜志;2000年02期

5 吳燕t

本文編號(hào)：1553701