本文關(guān)鍵詞： 野心家取向 非績(jī)效取向 職業(yè)生涯發(fā)展 問(wèn)卷編制　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：野心家取向是指員工以非績(jī)效取向的方式追求職業(yè)生涯發(fā)展的傾向。本研究開(kāi)發(fā)野心家取向問(wèn)卷,旨在探討野心家取向的結(jié)構(gòu)并調(diào)查分析中國(guó)文化背景下企業(yè)員工野心家取向的現(xiàn)狀。本研究先后通過(guò)訪談、探索性因素分析和驗(yàn)證性因素分析得到以下研究結(jié)果：(1)野心家取向問(wèn)卷包括5個(gè)維度18個(gè)項(xiàng)目,分別是人際關(guān)系、對(duì)雇主不坦誠(chéng)、生涯目標(biāo)與組織利益不一致、印象管理、欺騙操縱。(2)本問(wèn)卷具有較好的信效度。問(wèn)卷總的信度為0.813,各個(gè)維度系數(shù)都在0.57以上。在結(jié)構(gòu)效度上,經(jīng)過(guò)探索性因素分析,問(wèn)卷抽取的5個(gè)因子對(duì)方差解釋率達(dá)到57.57%,驗(yàn)證性因素分析報(bào)告中的擬合指標(biāo)為：x2/df=1.877, GFI=0.910, TLI=0.865, CFI=0.890, IFI=0.893, RMR=0.056, RMSEA=0.058,模型擬合良好。野心家取向各維度和馬基雅維利主義問(wèn)卷的相關(guān)在0.33到0.49之間,符合效標(biāo)效度的要求。(3)從野心家取向的總體看,人際關(guān)系維度得分最高,其次是印象管理、對(duì)雇主的不坦誠(chéng)、生涯目標(biāo)與組織利益不一致,得分最低的是欺騙操縱。具體到人口學(xué)變量,野心家取向總分在職位類別上差異顯著,高層管理者野心家取向的程度要高于中層和基層管理者。(4)具體到各維度上,野心家取向除在學(xué)歷、婚姻狀況和目前從事的職業(yè)方面不存在顯著差異外,在其他人口學(xué)變量如性別、年齡、工作年限、目前所在單位的性質(zhì)和在本單位所處的職位上均有顯著差異。
[Abstract]:Careerist orientation refers to the tendency of employees to pursue career development in a non-performance-oriented manner. The purpose of this study is to explore the structure of careerist orientation and to investigate and analyze the current situation of enterprise employee careerist orientation in the context of Chinese culture. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis obtained the following research results: 1) the ambitious family orientation questionnaire includes 18 items of 5 dimensions, which are interpersonal relationships and dishonest with employers. Career goals and organizational interests are inconsistent, impression management, deception manipulation. 2) this questionnaire has a good reliability and validity. The total reliability of the questionnaire is 0.813. The coefficients of each dimension are above 0. 57. In terms of structural validity, through exploratory factor analysis, the interpretation rate of the difference between the five factors extracted by the questionnaire is 57.57%. The fitting indexes in the confirmatory factor analysis report were: 1. 877, 1. 877, 0. 910, 0. 865, CFI=0.890. IFI 0.893, RMR 0.056, RMSEA=0.058. The correlation between each dimension of ambition orientation and Machiavellian questionnaire is between 0.33 and 0.49, which meets the requirement of criterion validity. Interpersonal relationship dimension scored the highest, followed by impression management, not honest to the employer, career goals and organizational interests are not consistent, the lowest score is cheating manipulation. Specific demographic variables. The total score of careerist orientation is significantly different in job category, and the degree of top-level managers' orientation is higher than that of middle-level and basic-level managers. There was no significant difference in marital status and occupation, but there were significant differences in other demographic variables such as sex, age, working years, the nature of the current unit and the position in the unit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：B849

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 馬超;凌文輇;方俐洛;;企業(yè)員工組織政治認(rèn)知量表的構(gòu)建[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1468019