【摘要】：我國(guó)正處在增長(zhǎng)速度換檔期、結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整陣痛期、前期刺激政策消化期“三期疊加”階段。“三期疊加”是我國(guó)走向社會(huì)主義現(xiàn)代化的必經(jīng)過(guò)程,這主要是經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整,經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變和多年積壓的社會(huì)各種矛盾共同作用的結(jié)果。隨著城市化和農(nóng)民工市民化的不斷加快,新科技如大數(shù)據(jù)、“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+”的廣泛應(yīng)用,使農(nóng)業(yè)與二、三產(chǎn)業(yè)融合發(fā)展,產(chǎn)生了新型職業(yè)村民,培育了鄉(xiāng)村新的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)點(diǎn),改變了鄉(xiāng)村生產(chǎn)生活方式。同時(shí)也應(yīng)該看到鄉(xiāng)村的空心化在不斷加深,收入差距不斷加劇,鄉(xiāng)村成員人際維系也多基于經(jīng)濟(jì)考量。外來(lái)以及傳統(tǒng)的負(fù)面文化又卷土重來(lái),正撼動(dòng)著鄉(xiāng)村的傳統(tǒng)優(yōu)秀的價(jià)值觀、社會(huì)信仰,致使鄉(xiāng)村當(dāng)中道德缺失,拜金主義、攀比思想橫行。治理水平低下,使得鄉(xiāng)村治安混亂、環(huán)境惡化。法治不完善,也使得安全事故、群體性暴力事件屢屢頻發(fā)。新常態(tài)要有新?tīng)顟B(tài),新理念呼喚新作為。全能型政府治理體系已經(jīng)不再適應(yīng)鄉(xiāng)村發(fā)展的需要。變?nèi)苄驼疄榉⻊?wù)與治理型政府,變封閉式治理體系為現(xiàn)代開(kāi)放式治理體系,成為我國(guó)全面建成小康社會(huì)的重要舉措。相比治理方式,優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化的鄉(xiāng)村治理功能有其無(wú)可替代的優(yōu)越性,不以強(qiáng)制和暴力為手段,因而具有調(diào)理性;不以控制和監(jiān)督為補(bǔ)充,因而具有高效集約性;不以外在規(guī)制為表現(xiàn),因而具有穩(wěn)定性;因優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化涉及鄉(xiāng)村生產(chǎn)生活的方方面面,所以還具有治理的廣泛性、靈活性等。因此將優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化引入到鄉(xiāng)村的治理當(dāng)中來(lái),探討優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化的鄉(xiāng)村治理功能,總結(jié)歸納出其實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑是本文的重點(diǎn)。本文從政治學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、公共管理學(xué)等學(xué)科出發(fā),以“優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化在鄉(xiāng)村治理現(xiàn)代化過(guò)程中可以發(fā)揮哪些功能并且以何種方式實(shí)現(xiàn)”為核心展開(kāi)研究。本文除緒論外一共有四章。其結(jié)構(gòu)為:緒論,主要介紹本論文的研究背景、意義以及國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀,也闡述了文章研究思路、方法和創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。第一章歸納了優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化的內(nèi)涵與基本特征、鄉(xiāng)村治理現(xiàn)代化的內(nèi)涵與重大意義,在此基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化與鄉(xiāng)村治理現(xiàn)代化的辯證關(guān)系。第二章分析了當(dāng)前鄉(xiāng)村治理現(xiàn)代化的困境及其文化根源。第三章為本論文的核心,詮釋了優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化在鄉(xiāng)村治理現(xiàn)代化過(guò)程中的功能。第四章提出了鄉(xiāng)村治理現(xiàn)代化引入優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化的路徑。本文對(duì)優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化與鄉(xiāng)村治理現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)行了初步理論研究。但是如何將其體系化、規(guī)范化,讓優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化在鄉(xiāng)村治理現(xiàn)代化過(guò)程中充分發(fā)揮作用,促進(jìn)鄉(xiāng)村治理的至善,仍然需要學(xué)界深入的探索和創(chuàng)新精神的注入。
[Abstract]:China is in the period of shift of growth rate, period of structural adjustment and labor pain, and stage of "three phases superposition" in the period of early digestion of stimulus policy. The "three phases superposition" is the necessary process for our country to move towards socialist modernization, which is mainly the result of the economic structure adjustment, the transformation of economic growth mode and various kinds of social contradictions which have accumulated for many years. With the rapid development of urbanization and the urbanization of migrant workers, the extensive application of new technologies such as big data and the Internet has brought about the integration of agriculture with the secondary and tertiary industries, resulting in a new type of professional villagers and a new economic growth point in the countryside. Changed the rural production and life style. At the same time, we should also see that the hollowing out of the countryside is deepening, the income gap is increasing, and the interpersonal support of rural members is based on economic considerations. Foreign and traditional negative culture has made a comeback, which is shaking the traditional excellent values and social beliefs in the countryside, resulting in the lack of morality, money worship and comparison of ideas in the countryside. Low level of governance, making rural security chaos, environmental degradation. Rule of law is not perfect, also make safety accidents, mass violence incidents occur frequently. The new normal must have a new state, new ideas call for new acts. All-powerful government governance system has no longer adapted to the needs of rural development. Changing the omnipotent government into the service and governance government and changing the closed governance system into the modern open governance system has become an important measure to build a well-off society in an all-round way in our country. Compared with the mode of governance, the rural governance function of excellent traditional culture has its irreplaceable superiority, it does not use coercion and violence as a means, so it has rational regulation, and it is not supplemented by control and supervision, so it has high efficiency and intensity. Because the excellent traditional culture is involved in all aspects of rural production and life, it also has the universality and flexibility of governance. So it is the focus of this paper to introduce the excellent traditional culture into the rural governance, to explore the rural governance function of the excellent traditional culture, and to sum up its realization path. Starting from the subjects of political science, sociology and public management, this paper focuses on "what functions and ways can be played by excellent traditional culture in the process of modernization of rural governance". In addition to the introduction, there are four chapters in this paper. Its structure is as follows: introduction, mainly introduces the research background, significance and current research situation of this paper, and also expounds the research ideas, methods and innovation points of this paper. The first chapter summarizes the connotation and basic characteristics of the excellent traditional culture, the connotation and significance of the modernization of rural governance, and summarizes the dialectical relationship between the excellent traditional culture and the modernization of rural governance. The second chapter analyzes the predicament and cultural origin of the modernization of rural governance. The third chapter is the core of this paper, explaining the function of excellent traditional culture in the process of rural governance modernization. The fourth chapter puts forward the way of introducing excellent traditional culture into the modernization of rural governance. This article has carried on the preliminary theory research to the outstanding traditional culture and the countryside governance modernization. However, how to systematize and standardize it, to give full play to the outstanding traditional culture in the process of modernization of rural governance and to promote the best of rural governance still need further exploration and injection of innovative spirit in academic circles.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安慶師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G122;D422.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 史炳軍;展赫男;;文化建設(shè)與社會(huì)治理[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年12期

2 盧鳳菊;;社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系的社會(huì)整合功能[J];求實(shí);2008年04期

3 閆平;;試論公共文化服務(wù)體系建設(shè)[J];理論學(xué)刊;2007年12期

4 郭靈鳳;;歐盟文化政策與文化治理[J];歐洲研究;2007年02期

5 李文群;;發(fā)揮傳統(tǒng)文化作用 構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)[J];中共石家莊市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

6 曾小華;文化定義現(xiàn)象述論[J];中共杭州市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

7 衣俊卿;論文化的內(nèi)涵與社會(huì)歷史方位——為文化哲學(xué)立言[J];天津社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年03期

8 格里·斯托克,華夏風(fēng);作為理論的治理:五個(gè)論點(diǎn)[J];國(guó)際社會(huì)科學(xué)雜志(中文版);1999年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2361451