【摘要】：英國著名的中國科技史研究學者曾經有一個疑問,中國古代在技術上一直都是領先于歐洲的,但創(chuàng)造了四大發(fā)明的中國卻沒有生長出現(xiàn)代科學,是何原因。前些年,錢學森先生在逝世之前也曾發(fā)出過這樣的追問,我們的科技與教育經過一個世紀的努力,雖然有了很大的發(fā)展,但仍沒有培養(yǎng)出世界級的科學與學術大師,在大師的培養(yǎng)方面,我們甚至還不及民國時期。學界將上述的疑問與追問概括為"李約瑟難題"與"錢學森之問"。對上述難題與疑問學界已有不少思考,本文試圖從馬克思歷史觀提供的思路,進行一種新的詮釋,即文化傳統(tǒng)的詮釋。中國近代之所以沒有生長出現(xiàn)代科學,沒有產生群星燦爛的科學與學術大師,原因盡管是多方面的,其中一個重要的原因是我們的傳統(tǒng)文化與文化傳統(tǒng)具有保守性,而文化傳統(tǒng)的保守性又是由農耕文明的生產方式與交換方式的保守性所決定的。
[Abstract]:A famous British scholar of Chinese history of science and technology once wondered why ancient China was always ahead of Europe in technology, but China, which created the four great inventions, did not grow modern science. In previous years, before his death, Mr. Qian Xuesen had also asked this question: after a century of hard work in science, technology and education, although we have made great progress, we have not yet developed a world-class scientific and academic master. In terms of master cultivation, we are not even as good as the Republic of China. The above questions are summarized as Needham's problem and Qian Xuesen's question. There have been many reflections on the above problems and questions. This paper attempts to carry out a new interpretation of cultural tradition from the ideas provided by Marx's view of history. The reason why modern science did not grow in modern China and the brilliant scientific and academic masters of the stars did not occur, although there are many reasons, one of the important reasons is that our traditional culture and cultural traditions are conservative. The conservatism of cultural tradition is determined by the conservatism of the mode of production and exchange of farming civilization.
【作者單位】： 華中師范大學馬克思主義學院;
【分類號】：B222;G122

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 胡傳勝;李約瑟難題與東方主義[J];學海;1999年05期

2 孔令宏;從傳統(tǒng)文化對王道政治的源屬性談李約瑟難題[J];大自然探索;1999年02期

，

本文編號：2291592